• Plagerizer

    From Roy Witt@1:387/22 to Bill McGarrity on Tue Apr 15 11:51:12 2014
    Greetings Bill!

    Roy Witt wrote to Ward Dossche <=-

    @MSGID: <534C89ED.6775.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
    @REPLY: <534C54A8.6771.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>

    Is this shit necessary^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Funny, the American Medical Association and all the doctors on the
    site you plagerized seem to agree with me that fertilization can
    occur while a woman takes the pill.

    The pill isn't fail-safe. The wrapper inside the packaging says so.

    Of course, Bill didn't supply any MDA source to back up his
    information, so his is a doubtful statement at best. Watch, he'll
    come up with something from his wiki homepage and call it legit.

    Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,

    Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link to
    what you were babbling on about.

    WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a
    100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized.

    Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind.

    Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of medicine?

    Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt
    that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so.

    The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and
    the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy.

    Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill
    everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may
    get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe.

    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.

    And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and you never have.

    Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them.

    Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word?

    How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you say
    planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic
    program.

    It is...but you aren't going to say anything against their liberal backing
    or their suggestions on BC because that's, well, you.

    If you follow the manufacturer's instructions, your chances of
    getting pregnant are nill. Those are pretty good odds in my book.
    And as they describe the theory, the pill prevents ovulation, as Tim
    has already said.

    Nill? The physician

    What physician?

    said there was a possible 5% chance a woman could become pregnant
    while using the pill.

    To reiterate, when using the pill as prescribed...If you take it
    willy-nilly, then your chances are more than 5% that you will.

    If you further read the link I posted to Tim,

    You didn't post any link, period.

    I wonder when you were a machinist if you would have told your boss
    the part you just made had a nill chance of not fitting.

    Been there, done that. Got a partnership on a pattent for my effort.

    Were/are you that type of machinist Roy? If so, I'd never use you.

    If you want it to be right, you would want to use me as your machinist,
    I'm a perfectionist in that regard. I wouldn't want you as a customer, but that's beside the point.

    www.plannedparenthood.org

    You've administered pills ...

    Actually, what he did without the proper knowledge or training, is
    to

    You don't know that, since Tim hasn't said so.

    I know where Tim worked (Grossmont Hospital in La Mesa, CA or one of
    their campus') and have had the opportunity to witness such
    procedures by other 'technicians' in that field.

    See, in the USA, we have doctors, RN (nurses), LVNs and 'pink
    ladies' as they were called there because they wore pink outfits and
    were not of the medical field, just technicians that administered
    meds among their other duties as such.

    I'd say that if they can read plain English (if you can call a
    doctor's writing as such), they're following a Doctor's prescribed
    medication order for him. Which they are allowed to do by state law.

    administer a product for which he's not licensed and of which the
    hormone imbalance can have lethal effects.

    What Tim did was follow instructions given to him that were in
    compliance with California state law and his employer. Been there,
    done that, have the T shirt.

    I agreed with what you said regarding Tim's administering the pills according to the physicians orders but the fact remains, the
    possibility of a fertilized egg being expelled due to the
    inhospitality of the uterus,

    Of course, there isn't much possibility of that happening, unless the egg
    was fertilized before she began to take the pill. Once the pill is in her system, the hormones in it will stop ovulation.

    Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
    to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
    freely around.

    Since Tim was there and you weren't, he fully knows how the pill works and
    he also knows that issuing that pill to a patient is what the doctor
    ordered, not Tim.

    It's kinda like when your ancestors were told to pay their debt or go to debtors prison, they didn't get out of prison until the debt was paid. If
    they fled to America, that didn't excuse the debt. If they were found in
    the colonies, they were sent back to debtors prison. The only person who
    didn't go to debtors prison was the person who handed you the goods
    or money.

    That was my point and it is fact as stated by Tim. Spin it all you
    like Roy is not going to change the facts.

    Anything that Tim had to say about it is according to what I know as a California citizen who has worked with doctors in prescribing meds to
    their patients. It is not up to Tim or I to go against doctor's orders.
    And his employer will enforce that, if he doesn't.

    The hormone imbalance you speak of is for a doctor to assess and no
    one else. In any case, the PILL is as safe to use as an aspirin, no
    license required to administer, just a Doctor's prescribed written
    order on a patient's chart. The procedure may differ in Belgum, but
    that's how it works in California.

    I agree.... things maybe different in Belgium.

    You only agree because you know that you've been wrong all along.

    Have a day! Today is #105 of 365...

    R\%/itt - K5RXT






    --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
    --- D'Bridge 3.99
    * Origin: South-Texas Area Hub - Gulf Coast Backbone (1:387/22)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to Roy Witt on Wed Apr 16 00:07:00 2014
    Roy Witt wrote to Bill McGarrity <=-

    @MSGID: <534D673D.196.2debate@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
    Greetings Bill!

    Roy Witt wrote to Ward Dossche <=-

    @MSGID: <534C89ED.6775.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
    @REPLY: <534C54A8.6771.2fidonews@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>

    Is this shit necessary^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    I just wanted to give you something that you could legitimately complain about.


    Funny, the American Medical Association and all the doctors on the
    site you plagerized seem to agree with me that fertilization can
    occur while a woman takes the pill.

    The pill isn't fail-safe. The wrapper inside the packaging says so.

    Of course, Bill didn't supply any MDA source to back up his
    information, so his is a doubtful statement at best. Watch, he'll
    come up with something from his wiki homepage and call it legit.

    Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,

    Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link
    to what you were babbling on about.

    WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a
    100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized.

    Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind.

    Ahhh, you need to review my last message about this. It's obvious you missed the links I posted showing both Tim's plagerism and the one where the doctor states the effectiveness of the pill is not 100% as you state. Now, being I know your silly little games, if I go back and show you you'll just say I added it after the fact so why even give you that opportunity. I know what I wrote and it's not my issue if you either can't read or comprehend my words. Go back to school.

    BTW, simply adding " " to a statement doesn't actually give the author the credit they deserve. Either a footnote or a link would do it. Neither of which Tim used. Now, funny how you believe him when he didn't use a link but raise hell with me when I did and you so convientently missed it. Who's blowing in the wind now Roy...


    Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of medicine?

    Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so.

    Go do your own reasearch then. Fact still remains taking birth control pills doesn't guarantee an egg will not get fertilized. You think differently, show me a link that states with a 100% guarantee it won't. You asked for proof, I gave it. Now you show me some proof from a board certified physician.

    The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and
    the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy.

    Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill
    everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may
    get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe.

    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.

    And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and
    you never have.

    The only reason you put a link there was due to I called you out on it and this is your childish attempt at turning the tables. Not going to work Roy... you've been outed.

    Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them.

    Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word?

    How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you say
    planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic
    program.

    It is...but you aren't going to say anything against their liberal
    backing or their suggestions on BC because that's, well, you.

    I'm sure that's there but I know you just picked and choose what you wanted. You talk about odds, most Powerball/Mega Millions has a 1 in 175 million chance of someone winning yet, people do.

    If you follow the manufacturer's instructions, your chances of
    getting pregnant are nill. Those are pretty good odds in my book.
    And as they describe the theory, the pill prevents ovulation, as Tim
    has already said.

    Nill? The physician

    What physician?

    said there was a possible 5% chance a woman could become pregnant
    while using the pill.

    To reiterate, when using the pill as prescribed...If you take it willy-nilly, then your chances are more than 5% that you will.

    If you further read the link I posted to Tim,

    You didn't post any link, period.

    You really are persistant....

    I wonder when you were a machinist if you would have told your boss
    the part you just made had a nill chance of not fitting.

    Been there, done that. Got a partnership on a pattent for my effort.

    Congrats... was it by chance? Afterall, nill chance is in your vocabulary when it comes to possible fertilization of an egg I figured you rolled that over to your work. Tell me something, have you ever thrown a piece of steel away when you cutting it on a lathe? Careful how you answer this Roy, because if you say no you'd be the only one in history. Your picture should hang in the Smithstonian.

    Were/are you that type of machinist Roy? If so, I'd never use you.

    If you want it to be right, you would want to use me as your machinist, I'm a perfectionist in that regard. I wouldn't want you as a customer,
    but that's beside the point.


    A perfectionist using the word "nill".

    www.plannedparenthood.org

    You've administered pills ...

    Actually, what he did without the proper knowledge or training, is
    to

    You don't know that, since Tim hasn't said so.

    I know where Tim worked (Grossmont Hospital in La Mesa, CA or one of
    their campus') and have had the opportunity to witness such
    procedures by other 'technicians' in that field.

    See, in the USA, we have doctors, RN (nurses), LVNs and 'pink
    ladies' as they were called there because they wore pink outfits and
    were not of the medical field, just technicians that administered
    meds among their other duties as such.

    I'd say that if they can read plain English (if you can call a
    doctor's writing as such), they're following a Doctor's prescribed
    medication order for him. Which they are allowed to do by state law.

    administer a product for which he's not licensed and of which the
    hormone imbalance can have lethal effects.

    What Tim did was follow instructions given to him that were in
    compliance with California state law and his employer. Been there,
    done that, have the T shirt.

    I agreed with what you said regarding Tim's administering the pills according to the physicians orders but the fact remains, the
    possibility of a fertilized egg being expelled due to the
    inhospitality of the uterus,

    Of course, there isn't much possibility of that happening, unless the
    egg was fertilized before she began to take the pill. Once the pill is
    in her system, the hormones in it will stop ovulation.

    Wrong again... but as I've been saying in previous posts, your issue with NPD blinds you from that fact.


    Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
    to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
    freely around.

    Since Tim was there and you weren't, he fully knows how the pill works
    and he also knows that issuing that pill to a patient is what the
    doctor ordered, not Tim.

    It's kinda like when your ancestors were told to pay their debt or go
    to debtors prison, they didn't get out of prison until the debt was
    paid. If they fled to America, that didn't excuse the debt. If they
    were found in the colonies, they were sent back to debtors prison. The only person who didn't go to debtors prison was the person who handed
    you the goods or money.

    What does debtors prison have to do with his morals when it comes to aborting a fertilized egg?

    That was my point and it is fact as stated by Tim. Spin it all you
    like Roy is not going to change the facts.

    Anything that Tim had to say about it is according to what I know as a California citizen who has worked with doctors in prescribing meds to their patients. It is not up to Tim or I to go against doctor's orders. And his employer will enforce that, if he doesn't.

    The hormone imbalance you speak of is for a doctor to assess and no
    one else. In any case, the PILL is as safe to use as an aspirin, no
    license required to administer, just a Doctor's prescribed written
    order on a patient's chart. The procedure may differ in Belgum, but
    that's how it works in California.

    I agree.... things maybe different in Belgium.

    You only agree because you know that you've been wrong all along.

    Roy Roy Roy.... you oblivious fool.... you really don't have a clue other than beating your chest thinking you have all the answers. Tim never quoted his source, quotes around a statement does not mean shit in the text based world. You seem to wish things true when it comes to proving your point that I didn't use a link when not only did I provide a link for Tim's plagerizism, in the past I've posted links for your plagerism. Seek help. Lord knows I tried to help steer you in the right direction.

    Be well...




    Bill

    Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Wittless.... wtf is a "neal"??
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BILL MCGARRITY on Wed Apr 16 12:59:00 2014
    On 04-15-14, ROY WITT said to BILL MCGARRITY:


    Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,


    *Tim* didn't "...plagiarize..." anything! I was ``quoting'' an authority on
    the subject. *You* are no such authority, on ANY subject!


    Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link to RW>what you were babbling on about.


    WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a
    100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized.

    Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind.

    Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of medicine?


    A "WebMd"? You are saying you are quoting a "WebMd"?


    Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt RW>that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so.


    The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and
    the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy.


    Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill
    everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may
    get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe.


    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.


    Planned Parenthood claims to be `an authority'. In fact..Planned Parenthood SUPPORTS your oft-stated position; abortion without restriction.


    And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and you RW>never have.


    Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them.


    You use all sorts of sources you never even name!


    Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word?



    How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you say
    planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic
    program.


    Thats exactly what it is. Its an abortion mill. And one day I fully expect
    that horror stories that rival or surpass what was revealed about Gosnell's death camp, will surface about Planned Parenthood, which the democrat leftists have been financing with taxpayers money!


    Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
    to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
    freely around.


    *You* have not the slightest notion what *Tim's own beliefs* are. I have never discussed any of my `beliefs' with you, or anyone else in Fido.


    This is a silly attempt on your part to play a `gotcha' on me over abortion.

    You've dragged it over about three Fido echoes now, and you have no more validity in the matter here than you had in the other two echoes. You didn't `gotcha' anybody over it. You're just continuing to make yourself look sillier and sillier. You tried to hit me over it using religion, which you thought I would be a strong adherent to. You were proven wrong! Fact is...if it were up to me, no religion would exist! Or are you so blind that you do not see that
    we are being treated to the modern-day version of the `Spanish Inquisition'?


    Only the religion involved now is not radical Catholicism...its radical Islam?


    There's no getting around the fact that there are over 50 million VICTIMS of abortion.


    The best of all birth controls is `abstinance'!


    The SECOND best birth control is the use of the MANY methods, both pill form and contraceptive device, available to prevent a pregnancy!


    You and your fellow cadre who are so supportive of `a woman's right to abortion', have not answered the one question I've asked over and over again for many years on this subject:


    If a woman is so weak-minded...so scatter-brained...so wrapped up in her `emotions' that she can't take a single, in-expensive pill each day, AS directed on the freekin' package, or make sure her sex partner uses a condom.. ...what makes anybody think she's smart enough to make a life-or-death
    decision for a human baby?


    For that matter...what makes anyone think she's smart enough to make the decision to have sex relations in the first place!


    Its been said many times, by many feminists and TV talk-show hosts; making the decision to have sex with a male of her choice is an important decision for a woman!

    The decision to end the life of a baby forming in the womb is even MORE important!


    And neither you, nor any other strong supporter of a woman's *right* to abortion...can get around that!


    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to TIM RICHARDSON on Wed Apr 16 17:50:00 2014
    TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-

    @MSGID: <534EECB9.198.2debate@tequilamockingbirdonline.net>
    @TZ: 40f0
    On 04-15-14, ROY WITT said to BILL MCGARRITY:


    Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,


    *Tim* didn't "...plagiarize..." anything! I was ``quoting'' an
    authority on the subject. *You* are no such authority, on ANY subject!

    Then post a link you used.

    Plagerize: (verb) take (the work or an idea of someone else) and pass it off as one's own. Did you mention the author at all? If not, you stole it.



    Tim didn't plagerize that site, he used " ", nor did you supply a link to
    what you were babbling on about.


    WebMd and the doctor reiterated my position that the pill is not a
    100% guarantee the egg won't get fertilized.

    Without a link, this is just blowing in the wind.

    Do you now doubt the words of a learned professional in the field of medicine?


    A "WebMd"? You are saying you are quoting a "WebMd"?

    You did.... I posted the link you stole it from wordfor word.


    Without a link to the actual statement, coming from you, I would doubt
    that the moon isn't made of cheese if you said so.


    The manufacturers describe what is in their pill, what it does and
    the theory of how it works to use it to prevent a pregnancy.


    Planned Parenthood warns that if you don't take your BC pill
    everyday at the same time of day, 1-in-100 of those who don't may
    get pregnant each year. Not will, but maybe.


    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.


    Planned Parenthood claims to be `an authority'. In fact..Planned Parenthood SUPPORTS your oft-stated position; abortion without restriction.

    Tim, you really need a course in irony. Think before you put your fingers in motion.


    And offering a link to what they have to say about it. You haven't and you
    never have.


    Guess when they suit your needs you'll use them.


    You use all sorts of sources you never even name!

    Oh? At what are all those http:// references? Or do you need a refresher course in reading comprehension as well?


    Since they're of your own ilk, how can you doubt their word?



    How convinent. I'll need to remember that the next time you said
    planned parenthood are just another liberal backed socialistic
    program.


    Thats exactly what it is. Its an abortion mill. And one day I fully
    expect that horror stories that rival or surpass what was revealed
    about Gosnell's death camp, will surface about Planned Parenthood,
    which the democrat leftists have been financing with taxpayers money!

    Gosnell again... is that all you got? I told you 4 days ago no one doubts Gosnell was an animal. And trust me, if the GOP gets it's way and repeals Roe v Wade, you think Gosnell was an animal? Wait till you see al those botched back alley ones. You should know better than anyone what went on before Roe v Wade.

    Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
    to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
    freely around.


    *You* have not the slightest notion what *Tim's own beliefs* are. I
    have never discussed any of my `beliefs' with you, or anyone else in
    Fido.

    LOL... you've only been preaching them over and over... good Lord man. Are you senile now?


    This is a silly attempt on your part to play a `gotcha' on me over abortion.

    You've dragged it over about three Fido echoes now, and you have no
    more validity in the matter here than you had in the other two echoes.
    You didn't `gotcha' anybody over it. You're just continuing to make yourself look sillier and sillier. You tried to hit me over it using religion, which you thought I would be a strong adherent to. You were proven wrong! Fact is...if it were up to me, no religion would exist!
    Or are you so blind that you do not see that we are being treated to
    the modern-day version of the `Spanish Inquisition'?

    The post I made in Fido Sysops was a mistake, I apologized and being you don't have access to there told Roy to forward it to you. Roy then posted it in DEBATE.... not me.

    Only the religion involved now is not radical Catholicism...its radical Islam?

    Radical being the key word.

    There's no getting around the fact that there are over 50 million
    VICTIMS of abortion.


    The best of all birth controls is `abstinance'!

    Agreed. Now understand, by that simple statement you agree that while a woman is on birth control there is a possibility an egg can get fertilized.


    The SECOND best birth control is the use of the MANY methods, both pill form and contraceptive device, available to prevent a pregnancy!

    Correct, and one of the ways is to make the lining of the uterus inhospitable for a fertilized egg.

    You and your fellow cadre who are so supportive of `a woman's right to abortion', have not answered the one question I've asked over and over again for many years on this subject:


    If a woman is so weak-minded...so scatter-brained...so wrapped up in
    her `emotions' that she can't take a single, in-expensive pill each
    day, AS directed on the freekin' package, or make sure her sex partner uses a condom.. ...what makes anybody think she's smart enough to make
    a life-or-death decision for a human baby?

    That's not what we were discussing. The discussion was YOU administered birth control pills thus going against your morals when it comes to terminating a life, that being the life as I've explained over and over again on one of the was the pill works.


    For that matter...what makes anyone think she's smart enough to make
    the decision to have sex relations in the first place!

    What makes you smart enough to make that decision for her? Are you not a believer in the 1st Amendment. You certainly toss it around enough when it suits your needs regarding religion.

    Its been said many times, by many feminists and TV talk-show hosts;
    making the decision to have sex with a male of her choice is an
    important decision for a woman!

    True, and it's just as an important decision for the man to have sex with the woman as well... unless you're one of those "guys" who take NO to really mean yes.


    The decision to end the life of a baby forming in the womb is even MORE important!

    Agreed, yet you gave pills to mentally handicapped women where the possibility of a fertilized egg would be expelled due to that very pill you administered.

    And neither you, nor any other strong supporter of a woman's *right* to abortion...can get around that!

    Sure we can and will. SCOTUS gave women the right to. Are you saying the SCOTUS is wrong?


    Tim, you've tried over and over again to make your boat float with absolutely no success. There are only three reasons why you can't understand one of the effects of birth control pills can be the expelling of a fertilized eggblinding you, one... you have been so indoctrinated and your tunnel vision is blinding you, two, you have a reading comprehension issue or your optometrist gave, you the wrong persciption for your reading glass. Either way I don't give a shit and I'm done here.

    (N)ext...


    Bill

    Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Motorcycles are everywhere... Look twice, save a life!!
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BILL MCGARRITY on Wed Apr 16 16:23:00 2014
    On 04-16-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to ROY WITT:



    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.



    Incidently....speaking of Planned Parenthood...


    Planned Parenthood *claims* that abortion is only `3%' of its operations.


    They lie.


    They also claim that they're there to `aid and assist in the healthcare of women'. Which is also a lie.


    The abortion industry in this country (what other country in the world
    operated by leftist democrats, could make an *industry* out of the deaths of babies, but America?), generates about a billion dollars a year. And a large amount of that *taxpayer* money goes to Planned Parenthood for their abortion mills around the country.


    As a *taxpayer* I strongly object to my money being used to pay for some female's abortion at Planned Parenthood, when *I*'m not even the one who made her pregnant to begin with!


    And a lot of other *taxpayers* feel the same way!


    If a bunch of leftist democrats think a female has a right to have sex
    anytime, and with anyone, she so chooses...let THEM pay for the abortion the stupid woman `chooses' to have because she `chose' to not keep her legs
    closed!


    How does it work out that what *she* has a right to choose...gets paid for out of *my* pocket?


    If they want sex any old time they *choose*...fine! Let THEM pay for their own birth control!


    If they get themselves pregnant and *choose* to have an abortion...fine! Let THEM pay for it out of their OWN pocket and not out of mine!


    BTW....Planned Parenthood itself admits that in 2012, "....abortion made up over 93% of its 'pregnancy services'....while prenatal care and adoption referals made up only 5.6% and .6% respectively."


    That from "...their most recent annual report (broken down by Susan B. Anthony list)".


    So yeah...abortion is an `industry'...it generates big money...and *taxpayers* pay the large share of it!


    By the way...one of those clowns in FidoNews (Ward Dossche?) left me a post this morning whining about how high the first day death rate is for babies in this country.


    Well....maybe if women and girls exercised a little more control over their emotions, not to mention females who aren't willing to `pay their own way'
    when it comes to pre-natal care, pregnancy under the supervision of a bonafide physician, take proper care of themselves during their pregnancy, and accept the responsibility of child care after delivery....that rate would be far
    less.


    Much of that high number reflects the pregnancies of under-age females,
    females who are irresponsible and shouldn't be pregnant in the first place,
    and the over-all laxity in our teaching of `morality' in this day and age.


    Not to mention females who live below the poverty line and shouldn't be
    getting pregnant to begin with!


    Maybe a lot less from the Dan Savage's of the country...and a lot more from people like Bishop Fulton J. Sheen's successors, might be in order; or Roert Schuller. Or Fredirick K.C.Price.


    Less `loose and free', and more `high moral standards and principles'!


    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to TIM RICHARDSON on Thu Apr 17 03:08:56 2014

    On 04-16-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to ROY WITT:

    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.

    Incidently....speaking of Planned Parenthood...


    I am going to assume posting in this echo was an error. Please
    desist.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Bob Klahn - Moderator - Debate Echo...
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BOB KLAHN on Thu Apr 17 07:01:00 2014
    On 04-17-14, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


    On 04-16-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to ROY WITT:


    Oh, now you're quoting planned parenthood.


    Incidently....speaking of Planned Parenthood...



    I am going to assume posting in this echo was an error. Please
    desist.



    There was no `error'. I laid down *MY* rules to you quite some time ago. If
    you don't want me to post in here...neither you nor anyone else will bring my name into this echo for any reason.


    Don't take umbrage with me...talk to your buddy `McGarrity'.



    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BILL MCGARRITY on Thu Apr 17 07:31:00 2014
    On 04-16-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:


    Roy, you need to go back and take a refresher course on reading comprehension. IF you got your head out of your ass you'd have seen I referenced a doctor on the very site that Tim plagerized,


    *Tim* didn't "...plagiarize..." anything! I was ``quoting'' an
    authority on the subject. *You* are no such authority, on ANY subject!


    Then post a link you used.


    I am not your research assistant! Go get it yourself! Its out there. *You*
    just don't want to see it. You aren't the first one who's pretended the truth isn't there to see.


    Thats exactly what it is. Its an abortion mill. And one day I fully
    expect that horror stories that rival or surpass what was revealed
    about Gosnell's death camp, will surface about Planned Parenthood,
    which the democrat leftists have been financing with taxpayers money!


    Gosnell again... is that all you got?


    *Gosnell* is the result of your oft-stated favorite subject: abortion on demand! Much like all liberal leftist democrats, you will try to make
    `Gosnell' disappear! The leftist media have already pretty much done so. All the horror photos, and even the aftermath of the case has disappeared from headline news! As soon as his sentence was handed down, all photos of his
    deeds quickly hit the `buried' pile! The left and their cadre in the
    mainstream media cannot have the Gosnell case reminding the nation what `abortion on demand' turned into!


    I will never let you or any other supporter of abortion, forget the Gosnell case. I wish there was a way for me to get hold of the photos of Gosnell's handiwork and post them in Fido for all to see! I'd rub the photos of murdered babies in your faces every time you brought the abortion subject up!


    I told you 4 days ago no one doubts
    Gosnell was an animal.


    And trust me, if the GOP gets it's way and repeals
    Roe v Wade, you think Gosnell was an animal? Wait till you see al those BM>botched back alley ones. You should know better than anyone what went on BM>before Roe v Wade.


    Tim should have, according to Tim's own beliefs, recused himself due
    to morality grounds according to the 1st Amendment he tosses so
    freely around.


    *You* have not the slightest notion what *Tim's own beliefs* are. I
    have never discussed any of my `beliefs' with you, or anyone else in
    Fido.

    LOL... you've only been preaching them over and over... good Lord man. BM>Are you senile now?


    You have tried again and again to assign a `religious' position to me I do not hold! *I* do not `preach' anything. You might look to your OWN problem with being "...senile..."!


    This is a silly attempt on your part to play a `gotcha' on me over abortion.


    You've dragged it over about three Fido echoes now, and you have no
    more validity in the matter here than you had in the other two echoes.
    You didn't `gotcha' anybody over it. You're just continuing to make yourself look sillier and sillier. You tried to hit me over it using religion, which you thought I would be a strong adherent to. You were proven wrong! Fact is...if it were up to me, no religion would exist!
    Or are you so blind that you do not see that we are being treated to
    the modern-day version of the `Spanish Inquisition'?


    The post I made in Fido Sysops was a mistake, I apologized and being you BM>don't have access to there told Roy to forward it to you. Roy then posted BM>it in DEBATE.... not me.


    See...you got a couple of problems with dragging this into this echo.


    Firstly...you know for a fact that Klahn has me on permanent ban from this echo. So you brought my name up in here *thinking* you'd blab your little tale and I wouldn't be able to respond. You're wrong! I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    Right now I imagine Klahn's rethinking the wisdom of allowing you to be a poster in here, `cause you're dragging your `flame war' from other echoes into this one. And Klahn isn't gonna like that (forget that this is probably the most message traffic this echo's had in over a year!).


    By the way...you brought this into the wrong echo if you think Klahn's gonna
    be on *your* side in these two controversies.


    See....he CAN'T take your side on either issue! The reasons being...Klahn, not all that long in the past, has made the claim that he's a *practicing* Catholic! Which means he CAN'T be one of your supporters on EITHER issue; abortion OR homosexual marriage!


    The Church teachings are strictly against abortion...and in the view of the Catholic Church, marriage between two people of the same sexual gender is an abomination! A mortal sin! And `sodomites' aren't looked upon with any more favor in the Catholic Church, than it is by me.


    So....you brought this into the wrong echo seeking an ally! Sorry!


    Only the religion involved now is not radical Catholicism...its radical Islam?


    Radical being the key word.

    There's no getting around the fact that there are over 50 million
    VICTIMS of abortion.


    The best of all birth controls is `abstinance'!


    Agreed. Now understand, by that simple statement you agree that while a BM>woman is on birth control there is a possibility an egg can get BM>fertilized.


    Are you and Klahn brothers or something? You both seem to make the same
    errors: twisting meanings and nuances into YOUR position, when no such thing has occured!


    I `agree' to no such thing!


    The SECOND best birth control is the use of the MANY
    methods, both pill form and contraceptive device, available to prevent
    a pregnancy!


    Correct, and one of the ways is to make the lining of the
    uterus inhospitable for a fertilized egg.


    You and your fellow cadre who are so supportive of `a woman's right to abortion', have not answered the one question I've asked over and over again for many years on this subject:


    If a woman is so weak-minded...so scatter-brained...so wrapped up in
    her `emotions' that she can't take a single, in-expensive pill each
    day, AS directed on the freekin' package, or make sure her sex partner
    uses a condom.. ...what makes anybody think she's smart enough to make
    a life-or-death decision for a human baby?


    That's not what we were discussing.


    That is `certainly' part of the discussion!



    The discussion was YOU administered birth control pills thus going against BM>your morals when it comes to terminating a life,


    NO! It wasn't! *You* tried to MAKE it that. But THAT wasn't the discussion at all.


    And here you come again with your weak attempt to equate following a doctors' prescribed medication orders, with what you *think* are my `morals'.


    Once again, you've lost this discussion in your fantasy-attempt to pull a `gotcha' by trying to make me out an `abortionist'!


    You lose!


    Your continued pursuit of a `gotcha' where none is to be had, only
    demonstrates once again your complete lack of any facts or evidence to back up your stated position.


    You've failed to hold any lucid, defensible position in either subject (abortion OR sodomite marriage between two same-sex couples), have resorted to nothing but false accusations, twisted words and meanings; and when all else failed, to curses and insults.


    You've had your chin wiped in both areas of discussion, and you are now
    reduced to making wild, unfounded assertions, that are made sillier and
    sillier everytime to try to toss them at me.


    A good piece of advice to you would be...you've come close to burying yourself in your own hole! You better stop digging!


    As for me....I've enjoyed leading you around by the nose in several echoes, watching you fall back on curses and insults in lieu of any facts or `content' to bring to the discussion of two topics; one of which you know very little or nothing...and the other in which I suspect you have first-hand experience ...albeit badly skewed! In any case...for my part...


    This discussion is now over! Any further material you post on either the subject of `abortion', or sodomite same-sex activity (marriage or otherwise), will go un-noticed by me from this point onward.






    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From Bill McGarrity@1:266/404 to TIM RICHARDSON on Thu Apr 17 14:29:00 2014
    TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-

    Two things and I'll not be bothering you again.

    Firstly, it was not I who posted or as your say "dragged" you into this echo, it was Roy. Talk to him.

    Secondly, I don't care what you believe in or what you do or how you do it. To me you're a non-entity just as I maybe to you, so let's cut the bullshit and just say fuck you to each other and leave it at that.

    Have a good live


    Bill

    Telnet: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
    IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
    Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live


    ... Motorcycles are everywhere... Look twice, save a life!!
    --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
    --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32
    * Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BILL MCGARRITY on Fri Apr 18 10:48:00 2014
    On 04-17-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-


    Two things and I'll not be bothering you again.


    Firstly, it was not I who posted or as your say "dragged" you into this BM>echo, it was Roy. Talk to him.


    I talked to Klahn. And I talked to you as well.


    Secondly, I don't care what you believe in or what you do or how you do BM>it.


    You must care; you keep harping on various subjects I've posted up facts on, and out and out accused *me* of participating in abortions, in a far stretch
    of the truth and facts that only made you look silly.


    You dragged three topics through three different echoes, tried to `get over'
    on me in all three topics, made false accusations aimed at me in two (you accused *me* of participating in abortions when you couldn't get around the fact that I was issuing medications as per a doctors' instructions and prescription. You out and out accused me of homosexuality when you couldn't come up with any facts that showed homosexual activity to be anything other than the sick, disgusting activity that it is, not to mention medically dangerous as well. And you also made yourself out a fool in the `climate change-nee-global warming discussion, being reduced to insults, curses, and foolishness in that topic as well).


    To me you're a non-entity just as I maybe to you, so let's cut the BM>bullshit and just say fuck you to each other and leave it at that.


    *You're* saying "fuck you"...


    But the topics haven't gone away. They're still there.


    By the way...on the subject of `abortion'?


    You and some of your adherents have gotten real pissed when I've brought
    Kermit Gosnell up and posted some facts on that case.


    I'm not surprised. Because the Kermit Gosnell case brought into the spotlight what free usage of abortion on demand with few if any restrictions, can ultimately lead to.


    Its almost loudly-embarassing how quickly the Gosnell case has been made to `disappear' from the news cycles. A glance at the photos (and not all of the photos were on public display) of his atrocities is strong testiment of the horrific side of the abortion issue. Of COURSE no politician or `activist mouth' like Pelosi or Fluke would want to `down-side' of the subject to make the light of day.


    Not even Hollywood is touching this. Amazing how quickly `movies' are cranked out when its some issue the leftist movie makers can do a multi-million dollar extravaganza on, make lots of money, and spread false facts and impressions about.


    But an issue that would REALLY grab the public eye, really graphic....cue the crickets!


    Not to worry....some private group are even now gathering the money and evidence to make a movie on the Gosnell case.


    There are actually very few restrictions in most places around the country as to how far into a pregnancy an abortion is proper....the sanitary onditions under which abortions are performed...inspections of facilities...etc etc.


    The abortion issue has been the left's pet project for several decades, now. And of course, a case like the Kermit Gosnell horrors cannot be allowed to be kept in the public eye for too long a period. It would tend to graphicly illustrate the realities of abortion: infanticide.


    If I were a Tea Party candidate for office in a district where a democrat who strongly supported abortion, every time the democrat's buses with their `bussed-in' supporters arrived at a campaign stop to hold a rally, they'd be greeted with billboards plastered with billboard-sized photos of Gosnell's handiwork!


    No....you don't have to talk to me anymore. And you don't get me to leave off, just because you can't discuss any issue without resorting to sandbox
    language, either.


    I'm glad I became a `non-entity' to you. Thats actually an admission of defeat on your part.


    Have a good live


    Ditto.



    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to BILL MCGARRITY on Wed Apr 30 03:13:10 2014

    On 04-17-14, BILL MCGARRITY said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    TIM RICHARDSON wrote to BILL MCGARRITY <=-


    Two things and I'll not be bothering you again.


    Firstly, it was not I who posted or as your say "dragged" you into this BM>>echo, it was Roy. Talk to him.


    Do not discuss it at all in this echo. You can cross reply to
    All-politics to continue it.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Bob Klahn - Moderator - Debate Echo...
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to TIM RICHARDSON on Wed Apr 30 03:11:36 2014

    ...

    See...you got a couple of problems with dragging this into
    this echo.

    Firstly...you know for a fact that Klahn has me on
    permanent ban from this echo. So you brought my name up in
    here *thinking* you'd blab your little tale and I wouldn't
    be able to respond. You're wrong! I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.

    And you just lied. There was no such agreement. I told you to
    stay out, and I tell anyone who tries to bring your name in not
    to do so. You are the one who post here when you are banned.

    And he just said he did not post here, Roy forwarded it to here.
    If he's wrong about that, send something in email. Otherwise,
    it's not his fault.

    Right now I imagine Klahn's rethinking the wisdom of
    allowing you to be a poster in here, `cause you're dragging
    your `flame war' from other echoes into this one. And Klahn

    No, I'm not. I expect him to end any such communication in this
    echo.

    ...

    The post I made in Fido Sysops was a mistake, I apologized and being you BM>>don't have access to there told Roy to forward it to you. Roy then posted BM>>it in DEBATE.... not me.

    Now, he's been notified, so leave the echo.


    By the way...you brought this into the wrong echo if you
    think Klahn's gonna be on *your* side in these two
    controversies.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Bob Klahn - Moderator - Debate Echo...
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BOB KLAHN on Wed Apr 30 10:33:00 2014
    On 04-30-14, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    ...

    See...you got a couple of problems with dragging this into
    this echo.

    Firstly...you know for a fact that Klahn has me on
    permanent ban from this echo. So you brought my name up in
    here *thinking* you'd blab your little tale and I wouldn't
    be able to respond. You're wrong!


    I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    And you just lied.


    No I didn't. Those are MY rules and conditions for staying out of your echo.


    Comply with them or expect me to be a regular poster in here!





    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to TIM RICHARDSON on Fri Jun 6 01:33:16 2014


    ...

    I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    And you just lied.


    No I didn't. Those are MY rules and conditions for staying
    out of your echo.

    You said we had an agreement. That was a lie.

    Comply with them or expect me to be a regular poster in
    here!

    You appear to have suffered brain damage, you are getting nasty
    and hostile, which often goes with a stroke. Get yourself
    checked out.

    Until then, you know damn well I do not allow discussion of
    peopel banned from the echo. You know damned well I enforce
    those rules.

    Stop trying to turn all of Fidonet into a sewer.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Bob Klahn - Moderator - Debate Echo...
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BOB KLAHN on Sat Jun 7 09:25:00 2014
    On 06-06-14, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


    ...

    I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    And you just lied.


    No I didn't. Those are MY rules and conditions for staying
    out of your echo.


    You said we had an agreement. That was a lie.


    I said no such thing. Thats the trouble with you leftist democrats. You
    take a simple sentence and `spin' it up into something it isn't.


    Look up there at that short paragraph of mine.


    It says (and I'm `quoting'):


    "I made an agreement with Klahn...."


    Notice the word *I* in that entire sentence? ...in fact in that
    entire paragraph...I neither openly express NOR imply that you
    were any part of that agreement which *I* made. I don't really
    care what *you* thought of it, I was stating what *I* was
    agreeing to. Your participation was neither solicited or needed.


    Comply with them or expect me to be a regular poster in
    here!


    You appear to have suffered brain damage, you are getting nasty
    and hostile, which often goes with a stroke. Get yourself
    checked out.


    You make a pathetic attempt to provoke an angry response to prove
    what? And here you are always claiming you `never' flame or insult
    people!


    So...did you lie all THOSE times? Or are you lying now!


    Until then, you know damn well I do not allow discussion of
    peopel banned from the echo. You know damned well I enforce
    those rules.


    You and your `rules' can go chase yourselves, I wasn't enumerating
    *your* rules...I was enumerating *MINE*! If you so much as
    post a reply to this message in this echo, I will start posting
    in here on a regular basis. I will post up long articles on a
    variety of subjects the lefties desperately wish would just go
    away before the mid-terms, and certainly before the 2016 election.


    Hey by the way....your `boy' in the White House, Hussein Obama just
    made the trade of the century! Five of the worst murderous ragheads
    for a deserter who should have been pushed out of the helicopter by
    one of the Special Forces who picked him up, at...oh...say around 2
    thousand feet or so. And the vehicle the 5 murderers and their
    friends were in immediately hit with a drone packed with enough
    explosives to make a crater 20 feet deep with the vehicle as
    `ground zero'.


    If you want to see some long articles on Benghazi and Hillary's lies
    and distortions...Hussein's selling out of America to its enemies,
    the decline of your unions, most of the controversies over the sodomites
    and their push to censor any and all spoken or written opposition to
    their efforts to pervert America....etc etc, just post up one single
    reply to this in this echo.


    By the way....I'm looking for a source of fido packets where you nor
    anyone else can cut me off from ANY echo I choose to post in.


    Stop trying to turn all of Fidonet into a sewer.


    Even if such were my intent, any effort I made toward that end
    would only be duplication, since you and your ilk have done such
    a fine job of that already!


    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to TIM RICHARDSON on Thu Jul 3 03:44:00 2014
    .PID: SX 4.5/P/6.0W5 RB10275
    .MSGID: 1:135/382 6bdcb4d5


    ...

    I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    And you just lied.


    No I didn't. Those are MY rules and conditions for staying
    out of your echo.

    You said we had an agreement. That was a lie.

    Comply with them or expect me to be a regular poster in
    here!

    You appear to have suffered brain damage, you are getting nasty
    and hostile, which often goes with a stroke. Get yourself
    checked out.

    Until then, you know damn well I do not allow discussion of
    peopel banned from the echo. You know damned well I enforce
    those rules.

    Stop trying to turn all of Fidonet into a sewer.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... Bob Klahn - Moderator - Debate Echo...
    --- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to BOB KLAHN on Thu Jul 3 12:33:00 2014
    On 07-03-14, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


    ...

    I made an agreement with
    Klahn that, for me to stay out of this echo...neither my
    name NOR any sly little references to anything I'm involved
    in elsewhere, gets brought up in here.


    And you just lied.


    No I didn't. Those are MY rules and conditions for staying
    out of your echo.


    You said we had an agreement. That was a lie.


    No it wasn't. Whether or not *you* were part and parcel
    of that agreement is completely unimportant to me.


    *I* told Ed Koon I `agreed' to stay out of here as long as *you*
    neither posted `to' or `about' me.


    And here you are posting *to* me. Which frees me to post in
    here as and when I choose.


    Comply with them or expect me to be a regular poster in
    here!


    You appear to have suffered brain damage, you are getting nasty
    and hostile, which often goes with a stroke.


    *You* seem to not be capable of being non-insulting. You also
    appear to be making the claim of being a `medical doctor' who
    makes long-distance diagnoses without any grounds for your
    `medical' conclusions.


    Get yourself checked out.


    You might take your own advice. `Physician, heal thyself'!


    Until then, you know damn well I do not allow discussion of
    peopel banned from the echo. You know damned well I enforce
    those rules.


    Then stop discussing me in here, refering to me in here, posting
    to me in here, or I will be residing in here permanently.


    In other words....leave me alone, period.


    Stop trying to turn all of Fidonet into a sewer.


    You have already succeeded in doing that all by yourself. Nobody
    could never lower Fidonet any deeper than what you've taken it
    to.


    I will only post in here whenever you post *to* or *about*
    me....or you deliberately provoke me by making some snide
    little insult or put-down I know is aimed at me.


    If you want me to stop posting in here, leave me alone.

    Completely.





    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)
  • From Roy Witt@1:387/22 to BOB KLAHN on Fri Aug 15 13:36:12 2014
    Greetings BOOB!

    As the moderator I am allowed to post to anyone posing in the
    echo.

    And yet, when Klahn is on the other end of that, he whines
    something fierce.

    Earl lied.

    Denial is not the name of a river in Egypt.

    I am not the one pretending to be above the rules.

    Finally a true statement! He doesn't "pretend" to be above
    the rules in his echo. He officially PLACES himself above
    the rules! He posts to and about banned people, he posts

    Earl lies.

    Denial is not the name of a river in Egypt.

    insults, and he tosses around the word "lie." He also

    Not in Debate.

    Denial is not the name of a river in Egypt.

    probably violates his "echo sabotage" rule, but it is so
    incoherent that it cannot really be called a "rule." It is
    just an excuse.

    Earl want's to destroy

    Denial is not the name of a river in Egypt.

    Have a day! They're numbered.

    R\%/itt - K5RXT

    --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
    --- D'Bridge 3.99
    * Origin: The Master Baiter Playground for Morons (1:387/22)
  • From Roy Witt@1:387/22 to BOB KLAHN on Fri Aug 15 13:56:26 2014
    Greetings BOB!

    * Original to: Roy Witt

    cc:Earl Croasmun

    Yes, he is moderating your echo.

    You forgot to sign it,

    Here, let me help you; BooB 'Dumbfuck' Klahn, all-knowing unless it's
    the truth...

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Greetings Dumbfuck ROY!

    Why is he now moderating your echo?

    Where do you see 'moderator' in anything I've said here?

    Your actions.

    You actions don't speak to the facts.

    Complaining about people telling you to fuck off seems to
    be your only calling in life. Get out of here while you
    still can. 2nd warning.

    And that is moderating his echo.

    If I were, your ass would have been booted long ago. You do as you've
    always done, lie, lie and lie.

    CC: Ed Koon

    BTW, I liked Fido in 1995, but now the flamers are getting more
    and more in control.

    You're the only flamer I see here...get out while you can.

    1st warning.

    Have a day!


    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fidonet In Your Language > DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)

    Have a day!

    R\%/itt - K5RXT

    --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012
    --- D'Bridge 3.99
    * Origin: The Master Baiter Playground for Morons (1:387/22)