However, if you are not in too much of a hurry at run time, you
could write your application in REXX.
I investigated that .. but actually gave up on it, as one reason, for precisely the exact same reason you noted above. I carefully avoided
all CHAIN operations and chose to carry all the required parameters
for control passage between executables as disk I/O. I thought that
made more sense in planning for portability. Thus executable
shifting and load time is important.
That is also one of the reasons I winced when I tried Visual Age for
Basic in OS/2 which I bought and have! Sure the ball bounces! But
by the time you ever see it bounce, your opponent has already stolen
the interpreter and scored ten goals with the silly compiled ball!
If, a la as PowerBASIC finally did for WIN-ugh, M/S and IBM had ever released a full compiler version of VB, that would have run on both
OS/2 and WIN-ugh, the world would have been VERY different today!
REXX has the same SELECT construct as does
PL/I. (REXX was derived, in part, from PL/I; in the same sense that
the original line-by-line-compiled Dartmouth BASIC was derived from
FORTRAN.) I got my copy of REXX for DOS (Personal REXX v 3.0 by
Quercus Systems) in 1991. It may still be available.
Here comes the education! Yes, if true, a part of portability sure
might be made between OS/2 and back-level DOS!
When Gordon Letwin crafted the foundation for OS/2 he also happened to
be the Chief Architect of the PDS Compiler! Somewhere in my printed
text I happen to have read his remark, I think it's his, that, "The arrival of a new language is marked by the arrival of the first true compiler." That's, in my feeble understanding of things, a very
Because of the way that PDS 7.1 was written to integrate the assembler operations for the HEX21 interrupt work so well into BASIC, we got
two very,very important things cross-referenced to both OS/2 and DOS!
We got a terribly simple-to-implement full network file I/O system
with file lock,record lock; shared multi-user tools. And to a lesser note, we also got the entire ISAM file engine buttoned up so that
even a dunce like Mikey could learn to use and implement full
networked file I/O with deadlock intervention and all that!
You know that insane feeling, the whirl of the dance, it plays with
you, it plays with you. And when the room quits spinning, "Morning
is breaking, comes the first morning ..."
Gee, playing that hymn on
a Baldwin concert grand is just like the computer keyboard when I
first discovered INT21, I swear it!
I still have somewhere, I think, the FidoNet post Bob Juge posted that chided me for even comparing DesqView to OS/2. I think that is one
of the landmark posts I've ever had addressed to me. I listened
CAREFULLY to what Bob said, took his advice. But ... in doing so,
the superb work of Gordon Letwin with PDS 7.1's FAMILY approach to programs and, specifically,the business of full network aware I/O,
has been, to me a mess elsewhere.
Where do I go to get the complete cadre of INT21 network tools, in
such a concise form as I've learned and written stuff for
shared-locked file I/O with other than C?
Remember! It isn't that
it can't be done in other languages that are available in OS/2!
It's that I have to be able to extend the services *BACKWARDS* in DOS, yes,pure DOS for another seven damned years after I make the toolset switch!
That and another of Gordon's diamond sharp gifts, variable length
string arrays with the assembly language automatic trashman! I
listened! I listened! I learned a little, enough to know I ain't
I need two things, big time! I need multi-dimensional variable-length string arrays, that, in fact, can be dimensioned, not as you might
suppose most folks do, but as DIM A$(-150 to +150, 10), or the like,
and full network aware file I/O shared read-write lock and deadlock protectable.
Can REXX, for example, and PL/1, in one easy common source code caper,provide me with full support for OS/2, WIN-ugh, and DOS, for
And don't you, huge grin, tell me like Paul Sittler used to and keeps telling me, "Write your own functions, stupid!" I won't live long
I've spent many hours with Ileff vectors, all that. I still can't
quite get Watcom C++ to let me get through the string game, but I'm
I think that's doable, and I know the file I/O bit is.
PL/1(i), whatever, OS/2, Win-ugh, DOS .. and REXX, are they really suitable tools for poor Mikey?
|Location:||Riverside County, California|
|Nodes:||13 (1 / 12)|