It is sad that the UK is not producing humorous material like that of
the Monty Python in the 1970s
Perhaps the BBC might consider having a Next Generation of Pythons if
Dr Who can regenerate itself and Star Trek can re invent itself
Why not the Python Genre? Or are we not making funny people anymore...?
I was amused to have seen *Motorau* write this:same
It is sad that the UK is not producing humorous material like that of
the Monty Python in the 1970s
Perhaps the BBC might consider having a Next Generation of Pythons if
Dr Who can regenerate itself and Star Trek can re invent itself
Why not the Python Genre? Or are we not making funny people anymore...?
Not to be querulous, but were the follow-ups to said programs /really/ the
or even on a par with the original? Well, in their own way, no, but even a re-invention would take a lot of wiggle room for viewers to develop a tastefor
it. For example, when "Twilight Zone" was brought back (and for a mercifully short time) it just did not have the same tone, feel, tension or expectationas
what bore the imprimatur of its originator, Rod Serling. As for aPython-type
show, only "Kids in the Hall" (from Canada) have come even close, and theyhad
the support of the producer of "Saturday Night Live", Lorne Michaels, a show which itself was essentially a Python clone, following closely on the heelsof
the disbanding of that group in the early 70's.with
Sure, a "new" Python may create a following, and there will certainly be detractors, but in today's creative uber-micro-management style, you end up
a camel; a horse as designed by a committee. Not to mention thepatronizing,
ever-spiraling-downward dumbing down of what they think is "funny" nowadays. Python was inspired lunacy, derived from its diverse influences stemming from its authors coming from a school of comedy as developed in their respective adolescent, collegiate and post-graduate endeavors. Today's audiences arefed
by people who believe they know /so/ much more than you or me as to whatthey
think we as the audience will find funny; the "will-it-play-in-Peoria?" mentality, i.e., will the average viewer who lives outside of their entertainment-world-cocoon be amused? Control is in the hands of those whose main concern is the bottom line, not the belly laugh, people who have nevereven
heard of the comic influences of those whose artistic lives they hold intheir
overeducated fist.zeitgeist,
Monty Python was a product of its time, its creators and the overall
all of which were brought together in some manner of supreme comic cosmic convergence, never duplicated, always imitated, so to answer my own question-
and in my opinion - any "Next Generation" Python would be merely a pale,flimsy
and clumsy carbon copy at best.all
Also, considering the relative autonomy the Pythons had over their show, I seriously doubt that the practices of BBC management ('eck, the U.S. is even worse. Committees, focus groups, demographic studies, "Notes, notes, notes"
serving to stifle the artist's inspiration) in today's market would allowsuch
creative freedom and thus suffocate the baby in the crib.be
So, it may (or more than likely, not) be funny as hell, but it just wouldn't
the same.
I was amused to have seen *Motorau* write this:same
It is sad that the UK is not producing humorous material like that of
the Monty Python in the 1970s
Perhaps the BBC might consider having a Next Generation of Pythons if
Dr Who can regenerate itself and Star Trek can re invent itself
Why not the Python Genre? Or are we not making funny people anymore...?
Not to be querulous, but were the follow-ups to said programs /really/ the
or even on a par with the original? Well, in their own way, no, but even a re-invention would take a lot of wiggle room for viewers to develop a tastefor
it. For example, when "Twilight Zone" was brought back (and for a mercifully short time) it just did not have the same tone, feel, tension or expectationas
what bore the imprimatur of its originator, Rod Serling. As for aPython-type
show, only "Kids in the Hall" (from Canada) have come even close, and theyhad
the support of the producer of "Saturday Night Live", Lorne Michaels, a show which itself was essentially a Python clone, following closely on the heelsof
the disbanding of that group in the early 70's.with
Sure, a "new" Python may create a following, and there will certainly be detractors, but in today's creative uber-micro-management style, you end up
a camel; a horse as designed by a committee. Not to mention thepatronizing,
ever-spiraling-downward dumbing down of what they think is "funny" nowadays. Python was inspired lunacy, derived from its diverse influences stemming from its authors coming from a school of comedy as developed in their respective adolescent, collegiate and post-graduate endeavors. Today's audiences arefed
by people who believe they know /so/ much more than you or me as to whatthey
think we as the audience will find funny; the "will-it-play-in-Peoria?" mentality, i.e., will the average viewer who lives outside of their entertainment-world-cocoon be amused? Control is in the hands of those whose main concern is the bottom line, not the belly laugh, people who have nevereven
heard of the comic influences of those whose artistic lives they hold intheir
overeducated fist.zeitgeist,
Monty Python was a product of its time, its creators and the overall
all of which were brought together in some manner of supreme comic cosmic convergence, never duplicated, always imitated, so to answer my own question-
and in my opinion - any "Next Generation" Python would be merely a pale,flimsy
and clumsy carbon copy at best.all
Also, considering the relative autonomy the Pythons had over their show, I seriously doubt that the practices of BBC management ('eck, the U.S. is even worse. Committees, focus groups, demographic studies, "Notes, notes, notes"
serving to stifle the artist's inspiration) in today's market would allowsuch
creative freedom and thus suffocate the baby in the crib.be
So, it may (or more than likely, not) be funny as hell, but it just wouldn't
the same.
--
The *Original* Captain Ozone
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,037 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 12:07:39 |
Calls: | 832 |
Files: | 95,177 |
D/L today: |
18 files (15,433K bytes) |
Messages: | 464,628 |