The usual echo rules apply. I realize that some users just
have aliases in TgM. Some moderators might want the user to
sign with their real name in that case - unless Stas' gate can
implement an Alias/RealName conversion?
It's implemented long time ago.
=== Import 2020-09-22_08-56-49.png Start ===
begin 644 2020-09-22_08-56-49.png
OH! Yes.. I remember that. There is a "Name: First Name, Last
Name" config in TgM. I guess that's what your gate is picking
up? But if someone were to have that part blank or refuse to
fill that out, how does your system pick up and maintain the
real name to meet some echo requirements?
OH! Yes.. I remember that. There is a "Name: First
Name, Last Name" config in TgM. I guess that's what
your gate is picking up? But if someone were to have
that part blank or refuse to fill that out, how does
your system pick up and maintain the real name to meet
some echo requirements?
Each Telegram user has a unique USER ID.
That is a good feature. But as a couple of my previous posts
showed, I can change FN = AA, LN = blank, and FN = August and LN
= blank in my TgM settings. The TGUID stays the same, but the
gate can't accomodate the FN + LN requirement for some fido
echomail areas. Maybe the gate can refuse to broadcast a message
if the LastName is blank?
Hello, August Abolins.
On 9/23/20 8:35 AM you wrote:
That is a good feature. But as a couple of my previous posts
showed, I can change FN = AA, LN = blank, and FN = August and LN
= blank in my TgM settings. The TGUID stays the same, but the
gate can't accomodate the FN + LN requirement for some fido
echomail areas. Maybe the gate can refuse to broadcast a message
if the LastName is blank?
If I am not mistaken, at least most of the Echoes rules that I recall have a caveat about Real Names being in the Body of the message if an alias or handle is in the FN LN section.
--
Best regards!
Posted using Hotdoged on Android
That is a good feature. But as a couple of my previous posts
showed, I can change FN = AA, LN = blank, and FN = August and
LN = blank in my TgM settings. The TGUID stays the same, but
the gate can't accomodate the FN + LN requirement for some
fido echomail areas.
Maybe the gate can refuse to broadcast a message if the
LastName is blank?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,042 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 01:07:12 |
Calls: | 500,919 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 109,372 |
D/L today: |
15,818 files (2,423M bytes) |
Messages: | 305,068 |
Posted today: | 7 |