REally, it declined that early? I wasn't around during that time, but I've heard a remaster here and there, compared to the 90s version, and
it was different.
StormTrooper wrote to boraxman <=-
REally, it declined that early? I wasn't around during that time, but I've heard a remaster here and there, compared to the 90s version, and
it was different.
There's always exceptions... The further into the 80s and early 90s I'd say they became less cohesive in general, and loaded with more duds.
I've not had much to do with anything remastered... only one I ever got
my hands on was Led Zeppelin Remasters, can't say I noticed any
difference between it and any other versions I'd heard.
Devin Townsend once talked about complaints that his albums were "quiet" (despite having heavy moments) and he explained it as a necessity of
Alonzo wrote to boraxman <=-
Devin Townsend once talked about complaints that his albums were "quiet" (despite having heavy moments) and he explained it as a necessity of
For vinyl records, the louder a track is, the bigger the groove.
So if an artist wanted to get the most music on the album,
they would sometimes lower the volume of the track. I remember
having an album that had one track that was recorded
at a different volume, just to squeeze it in.
One thing I never experienced, but always wanted to try, was loading computer data from vinyl. It should theoretically be possible to encode digital data somehow, and have a turntable read it. Either the computer records the analog signal and converts, or the turntable has a DAC built in.
I suspect someone did do this.
Interesting, I hadn't thought of that, but it makes sense.
One thing I never experienced, but always wanted to try, was loading computer data from vinyl. It should theoretically be possible to encode digital data somehow, and have a turntable read it. Either the computer records the analog
signal and converts, or the turntable has a DAC built in.
I suspect someone did do this.
Alonzo wrote to boraxman <=-
Devin Townsend once talked about complaints that his albums were
"quiet" (despite having heavy moments) and he explained it as a
necessity of
For vinyl records, the louder a track is, the bigger the groove.
So if an artist wanted to get the most music on the album,
they would sometimes lower the volume of the track. I remember
having an album that had one track that was recorded
at a different volume, just to squeeze it in.
Interesting, I hadn't thought of that, but it makes sense.
One thing I never experienced, but always wanted to try, was loading computer data from vinyl. It should theoretically be possible to
encode digital data somehow, and have a turntable read it. Either the computer records the analog signal and converts, or the turntable has
a DAC built in.
I suspect someone did do this.
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,020 |
| Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
| Uptime: | 222:05:24 |
| Calls: | 504,111 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 154,827 |
| D/L today: |
2,645 files (311M bytes) |
| Messages: | 444,642 |
| Posted today: | 2 |