On 11-08-14 23:03, Lee Lofaso wrote to All <=-
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare? If so, who would pay for such a procedure?
Not even insurance companies provide such coverage for working
folks. Conservatives seem to like the idea, even going so far
as to make it a new publicly-funded government program ...
Hello Everybody,
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare?
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare? If so, who would pay for such a
procedure? Not even insurance companies provide such
coverage for working folks. Conservatives seem to like the
idea, even going so far as to make it a new publicly-funded
government program ...
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare?
No;
But They should not be given one more penny IF they have a child AFTERthey
are already on welfare.
If you can't support a kid on your own (or with a partner), don't haveone
and expect society to pay for it.
Hello John,
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare?
No;
David Duke thought it was good idea. Many other Americans agreed
with him, electing him (as a Republican) to Congress. He then went
on to make the runoff for governor of Louisiana, but was easily
defeated by (Democrat) Edwin Edwards, who made race and welfare a
major part of his campaign. :)
But They should not be given one more penny IF they have a childAFTER they
are already on welfare.
I don't see why not.
David Duke thought it was good idea. Many other Americans agreed
with him, electing him (as a Republican) to Congress. He then went
on to make the runoff for governor of Louisiana, but was easily
defeated by (Democrat) Edwin Edwards, who made race and welfare a
major part of his campaign. :)
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare? If so, who would pay for such a
procedure? Not even insurance companies provide such
coverage for working folks. Conservatives seem to like the
idea, even going so far as to make it a new publicly-funded
government program ...
Since those on welfare have tended to be on it for a reasonably
short time over the last couple decades, and that long predates
the 1995 welfare deform act,
it would be absurd to make such a permanent change for a temporary situation.
OTOH, if you count everyone who get some benefit from the govt,
then you have a setup for revolution.
Sterilization has, in the past, been a prescription for those
not liked by those in power. Let that become law and you can see
the revolution bloom.
Should welfare recipients be sterilized as a condition to
remain on welfare?
No;
David Duke thought it was good idea. Many other Americans agreed
with him, electing him (as a Republican) to Congress. He then went
on to make the runoff for governor of Louisiana, but was easily
defeated by (Democrat) Edwin Edwards, who made race and welfare a
major part of his campaign. :)
That is true. But has nothing to do with me. Why bring it up?
But They should not be given one more penny IF they have JM>a child AFTERthey are already on welfare.
I don't see why not.
I know you don't.
I also know it is pointless to try and discuss it with you.
Everybody wants to get a free lunch. Not just you and me.
But how much in life is truly free? And how much, if
anything, is anybody entitled to?
The way I look at things, the world owes me a living. I
tell that to people, and they look at me cock-eyed. But
it's true. The economy is for the person, not the other way
around.
Strange how history works. We gave Germans an idea. Then
Germans used that idea to create a monster. Then we bury
our idea and hope nobody notices. And then somebody in
America digs it up and presents it as a new idea.
Everybody wants to get a free lunch. Not just you and me.
But how much in life is truly free? And how much, if
anything, is anybody entitled to?
Surely he who is worthy to receive his days and his nights is
worthy of all else from you.
The way I look at things, the world owes me a living. I
tell that to people, and they look at me cock-eyed. But
it's true. The economy is for the person, not the other way
around.
Hmmm...you are sounding like the pope. Actually, the last couple
popes. Don't let it go to your head.
Strange how history works. We gave Germans an idea. Then
Germans used that idea to create a monster. Then we bury
our idea and hope nobody notices. And then somebody in
America digs it up and presents it as a new idea.
What goes around sometimes has to be dug up to come around.
But how much in life is truly free? And how much, if
anything, is anybody entitled to?
Surely he who is worthy to receive his days and his nights is
worthy of all else from you.
"Each according to his needs." - The Rule of Democrats
"Each according to his wants." - The Rule of Republicans
"The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want." - Bernie
Sanders
it's true. The economy is for the person, not the other way
around.
Hmmm...you are sounding like the pope. Actually, the last couple
popes. Don't let it go to your head.
The pope is sounding more and more like an American.
somebody in America digs it up and presents it as a new
idea.
What goes around sometimes has to be dug up to come around.
Give a dog a bone and hope it stays buried?
Not gonna happen. No matter how
many times you try to bury something,
it will come rolling home.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,055 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 17:58:30 |
Calls: | 501,024 |
Calls today: | 11 |
Files: | 109,384 |
D/L today: |
2,218 files (187M bytes) |
Messages: | 304,880 |
Posted today: | 1 |