• Recently found this.

    From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to ALL on Sun Aug 24 01:49:00 2014

    With all the BS talk about democrats wanting immigration reform
    to get new voters who will vote democratic, one thing seem to
    be left out.

    I had forgotten, it is the states that decide who gets to vote.
    When it comes to race, age and sex, it's in the constitution. Other
    than that, I do believe it is the states who decide who gets to
    vote.

    So, the republican states could let favorable groups vote, even
    though they aren't citizens. And block those who are. Since all
    federal offices are decided by state population, not by actually
    by popular vote, that would be interesting.



    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... A boat is defined as, "A hole in the water you throw money into."
    * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to BOB KLAHN on Thu Aug 28 22:15:07 2014
    Hello Bob,

    With all the BS talk about democrats wanting immigration reform
    to get new voters who will vote democratic, one thing seem to
    be left out.

    Wazzat?

    I had forgotten, it is the states that decide who gets to vote.

    You forget about the Voting Rights Act, which mandates that
    Southern states need to get approval from the DOJ in matters
    concerning federal elections.

    When it comes to race, age and sex, it's in the constitution.

    Southern states still need to get approval from the DOJ, irregardless
    of what the US Constitution says or does not say.

    Other than that, I do believe it is the states who decide who gets to
    vote.

    The DOJ decides what Southern states can get away with, allowing all
    other states to do whatever the hell they want.

    So, the republican states could let favorable groups vote, even
    though they aren't citizens.

    Republicans want to end the Voting Rights Act, thus returning fairness
    to every state in the USA. Democrats have to come to the realization
    that George Wallace is dead, as well as Bull Connor and Lester Maddox.

    And block those who are.

    Governor Rick Perry says he wants to become President of Texas.
    Many Republicans want to grant him that wish. But Democrats are
    adamantly opposed. And nobody can imagine why, as no Republican
    could ever hope to win the White House without Texas.

    I guess it must be Democrats' sense of fair play. Especially
    given the fact that Democrat Barack Obama won the state of Florida
    twice in a row, thanks to all them Cubans in Miami.

    Since all federal offices are decided by state population, not by actually by popular vote, that would be interesting.

    You have it all wrong -

    Gerald R. Ford was appointed, not elected.

    George W. Bush was appointed, not elected.

    Need more be said?

    --Lee

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)
  • From BOB KLAHN@1:123/140 to LEE LOFASO on Thu Oct 9 00:53:00 2014
    Hello Bob,

    With all the BS talk about democrats wanting immigration reform
    to get new voters who will vote democratic, one thing seem to
    be left out.

    Wazzat?

    I had forgotten, it is the states that decide who gets to vote.

    You forget about the Voting Rights Act, which mandates that
    Southern states need to get approval from the DOJ in matters
    concerning federal elections.

    No, I didn't forget, but that's a limited rule, and it prevents
    them from keeping people from voting, not from allowing them to
    vote.

    When it comes to race, age and sex, it's in the constitution.

    Southern states still need to get approval from the DOJ,
    irregardless of what the US Constitution says or does not
    say.

    Again, when it comes to restricting voting on the basis of race
    etc.

    Other than that, I do believe it is the states who decide who gets to
    vote.

    The DOJ decides what Southern states can get away with,
    allowing all other states to do whatever the hell they want.

    So, the republican states could let favorable groups vote, even
    though they aren't citizens.

    Republicans want to end the Voting Rights Act, thus
    returning fairness to every state in the USA. Democrats
    have to come to the realization that George Wallace is
    dead, as well as Bull Connor and Lester Maddox.

    Their spirit lives on.

    And block those who are.

    Governor Rick Perry says he wants to become President of
    Texas. Many Republicans want to grant him that wish. But
    Democrats are adamantly opposed. And nobody can imagine
    why, as no Republican could ever hope to win the White
    House without Texas.

    Maybe because Rick Perry is one of the worst possible choices.
    Other than he let an innocent man be executed.

    I guess it must be Democrats' sense of fair play.
    Especially given the fact that Democrat Barack Obama won
    the state of Florida twice in a row, thanks to all them
    Cubans in Miami.

    The Republicans think they own the Cuban Vote. It's the only
    Hispanic vote they get the majority of.

    Since all federal offices are decided by state population,
    not by actually by popular vote, that would be interesting.

    You have it all wrong -

    Gerald R. Ford was appointed, not elected.

    Gerald R. Ford was nominated and confirmed, but that was a
    crisis situation.

    George W. Bush was appointed, not elected.

    True.

    Need more be said?

    No, I said it all above.

    BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

    ... But my assault rifle IS for sport! I use it for hunting fundies.
    * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)