My posts to you in the Debate echo were in response to posts
from you in the debate echo, defending the debate echo.
I have not posted in that echo in a long time.
Docsplace msg 1620 in the debate echo, Sept 3 2013.
FORUM: DEBATE HOST: DOCS
DATE: Sep-3-13 11:24am MSG: 1620
FROM: Earl Croasmun
TO: All
SUBJECT: Milton Friedman
The same post shows up on Prism as:
"From: Earl Croasmun
To: All
Date: 1st January, 2098 at 00:00
Subject: Milton Friedman"
And it appeared several posts AFTER your post to me in
Debate, headed:
"From: BOB KLAHN
To: EARL CROASMUN
Date: 1st January, 2098 at 00:00
Subject: Milton Friedman"
So you are sort of answering my question about how dumb you
are. And your answer does not make you look very good....
You say you don't want me in your echo, and I have stayed
out. But you repeatedly post to me IN that echo, in direct
happening in echoes where you are banned. Everyone who
knows you knows that you are a hypocrite, but you could at
least try to be subtle about it.
One recent example was via Doc's:...
From: BOB KLAHN
To: EARL CROASMUN
Date: 2013-09-28 01:13:28
Subject: Ed Snowden's email provid
From: BOB KLAHN
To: EARL CROASMUN
Date: 1985-07-12 15:25:56
Subject: Stay home!
But in 1985 I was not banned from the echo.
When you took your DeLorean back to 1985, did you place any
bets on the '85 World Series?
He tried to represent that echo as `his' to a friend of
mine and told him in what tone he could post in there. I
set the guy straight on that.
Richardson lies.
Klahn lies.
Since I never tried to represent the echo as anything other than
Ed Koon's, which Tom well knew, Richardson lies.
You're the type of son-of-a-bitch who, by the way you speak
to someone, slyly gives an impression that you are `in
charge'. Thats what you did.
And you're also the type of son-of-a-bitch who plays on
that impression for all its worth. Thats what you did. You
did it with Earl's echo and got away with it for some time,
until you tried to list the echo in your name. Then you got
insult you. You're no doubt as big a piece of shit to those
who have to put up with you in your everyday life, as you
are in this media. I imagine you have few friends. You
certainly have none in Fido.
full well that he'll respond. But I regress, isn't it
against the rules of your so called DEBATE echo to debase
anyone who disagrees with the moderator, outside of the
echo, and also against the moderators rules to
All he has to do is deselect the debate echo and no one can bait
him there.
Why should he have to? If the rules of that echo state that
there shouldn't be anything negatively mentioned about
those outside of the echo, or those who've been banned by
you from participating there?
...
full well that he'll respond. But I regress, isn't it
against the rules of your so called DEBATE echo to debase
anyone who disagrees with the moderator, outside of the
echo, and also against the moderators rules to
Richardson posted in the echo.
...
All he has to do is deselect the debate echo and no one can bait
him there.
Why should he have to? If the rules of that echo state that
He doesn't have to, it was a suggestion. Maybe help his blood
pressure.
there shouldn't be anything negatively mentioned about
those outside of the echo, or those who've been banned by
you from participating there?
Richardson posted in the echo. There is no mention of him there
other than his doing that.
...
BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
* Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
Brer BOB KLAHN wrote to Brer ROY WITT about Ed Snowden's
email provid:
...
full well that he'll respond. But I regress, isn't it
against the rules of your so called DEBATE echo to debase
anyone who disagrees with the moderator, outside of the
echo, and also against the moderators rules to
Richardson posted in the echo.
Stupid is as stupid says, I always say.
full well that he'll respond. But I regress, isn't it
against the rules of your so called DEBATE echo to debase
anyone who disagrees with the moderator, outside of the
echo, and also against the moderators rules to
Richardson posted in the echo.
Stupid is as stupid says, I always say.
Richardson posted in the echo. There is no mention of him there
other than his doing that.
Really!? That's hiliarious...
Your messages showed up in the Debate echo. That is when I post
to you there. Check with your fido provider.
It is working just fine. And Doc's is working fine, in
spite of the fact that posts from you through Doc's are
showing up on other boards as having been sent by you in
1904, in 2098, and various other dates. You and Lee are
just hilarious to watch in action.
full well that he'll respond. But I regress, isn't it
against the rules of your so called DEBATE echo to debase
anyone who disagrees with the moderator, outside of the
echo, and also against the moderators rules to
Richardson posted in the echo.
Stupid is as stupid says, I always say.
Yes, that was stupid of him. Glad you can see that.
...
Richardson posted in the echo. There is no mention of him there
other than his doing that.
Really!? That's hiliarious...
The truth is hiliarious to you?
...
BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
* Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 Join Us: www.DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
I said Doc's is working fine. You respond by telling me to
COMPLAIN to him.
I said complain to Ed so he can tell you where to shove it.
Which, as I already explained, was a really stupid thing
for you to say. When I repeatedly explain to you that
Doc's is working fine, what would I complain to him ABOUT?
*I TOLD YOU DOCS IS WORKING FINE*.
The only basis I might have is to complain that he has one
user who is a klawn and who is trying to instigate an
argument between a moderator and a sysop where there is no
I told you to check with *YOUR* sysop, and you tried to claim it
is coming from this end. Now check with your sysop cause you
claimed docsplace as the origin of the problem.
I said Doc's is working fine. You respond by telling me to
COMPLAIN to him.
I said complain to Ed so he can tell you where to shove it.
Which, as I already explained, was a really stupid thing
for you to say. When I repeatedly explain to you that
Doc's is working fine, what would I complain to him ABOUT?
*I TOLD YOU DOCS IS WORKING FINE*.
Yes, I told you that several times now. And yet you want
to goad me into complaining to Ed, which was awfully
childish and transparent of you.
The only basis I might have is to complain that he has one
user who is a klawn and who is trying to instigate an
argument between a moderator and a sysop where there is no
I told you to check with *YOUR* sysop, and you tried to claim it
is coming from this end. Now check with your sysop cause you
claimed docsplace as the origin of the problem.
That is an outright lie. I told you my provider is working
fine, and I told you that your provider is working fine.
Do you see where your reputation for dishonesty comes from?
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
Yes, I told you that several times now. And yet you want
to goad me into complaining to Ed, which was awfully
childish and transparent of you.
Then what the hell are you bitching about?
Now, you must admit, since everything at Docs Place is hunky
dory, then those screwed up msgs are not coming from my end.
you claimed docsplace as the origin of the problem.
That is an outright lie. I told you my provider is working
fine, and I told you that your provider is working fine.
Then why the hell are you bothering me about this?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,049 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 88:43:31 |
Calls: | 235,751 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 60,336 |
D/L today: |
115 files (53,537K bytes) |
Messages: | 20,616,130,436 |