RE: Speed of light???
This would really mess up Einstein et al.
Better keep it a secret, ok?
-Yup...but then again, Einstien did say TIME IS RELATIVE so to say LIGHT GOING
James King, Coldwater, Mi And that's JIM to you guys!
AT A DISTANCE PER TIME UNIT would also have to be relative to the time.
186,000 miles per second (second being a measure of relative time) A good SS>particle physics lawyer will know how to bend the laws of physics. Hehe...I SS>liked that pun. :)
Pick this up in PARANORMAL NETs Super Science and Events
RE: Speed of light???
This would really mess up Einstein et al.
Better keep it a secret, ok?
-Yup...but then again, Einstien did say TIME IS RELATIVE so to say LIGHT G SS>AT A DISTANCE PER TIME UNIT would also have to be relative to the time.
James King, Coldwater, Mi And that's JIM to you guys!
Traveling at the speed of light, Time is relative. Or maybe under the influence of a large gravitational body... It would be hard to consider taking measurements under such conditions... or that they would have any meaning.
If the clock and a beam of light were in the same set of
circumstances... I think Einstein would be found correct.
186,000 miles per second (second being a measure of relative time) A good SS>particle physics lawyer will know how to bend the laws of physics. Hehe.. SS>liked that pun. :)
Pick this up in PARANORMAL NETs Super Science and Events
But I don't get the PARANORMAL Net.
-Maybe you could ask your Sysop. :)
James King, Coldwater, Mi And that's JIM to you guys!
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,056 |
| Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
| Uptime: | 07:10:31 |
| Calls: | 501,454 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 109,439 |
| D/L today: |
2,918 files (302M bytes) |
| Messages: | 298,002 |