So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today?--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
With win98, xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so
out of date. Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe
just release a publis source for writing a custom navigator, and let
people create 16- or 32- bit as they desire.
We have heard several times now that updating has/is being considered.
There are other fish frying right now in Hector's kitchen that need to
be watched more closely.
Although a bit archaic, wcnav and the nav clients are not totally
'useless', especially in a world where many people with less than 'state
of the art' machines and software are concerned.
For the present, I'm happy it is still supported without abused or
broken 'standards' and functionality which would possibly be instituted
by publicly releasing the source.
I do not say that improvement are not needed or that we shouldn't be
allowed to 'experiment', but the whole WINS package as a whole is fairly unified and I for one prefer it that way.
--
D
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today?
With win98, xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so
out of date. Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe
just release a publis source for writing a custom navigator, and let people create 16- or 32- bit as they desire.
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today? With win98, >xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so out of date. >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just release a publis >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people create 16- or 32- bit as >they desire.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:win98,
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today? With
publisxp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so out of date. >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just release a
assource for writing a custom navigator, and let people create 16- or 32- bit
they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still use WCNav.
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used by anyone.
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://www.netcava.net
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting winserver client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and energetic,
maybe more people would use it.
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today?
xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so out of d >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just relea >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people create 16-
they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still use WCNav.
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used by anyone.
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://www.ne
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting winserver client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and energetic,
maybe more people would use it.
Navigator is a potent marketing tool, IMHO. Clean interface, differentiation, perceived value.
32-bit would be very welcome. And one or two extra optional buttons in
the Connection Manager window pointing to http:// adresses of sysop
choice would help make it work even better as a site specific navigation
bar (e.g. one extra button for your real estate database, chat, etc).
Henrik
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of today? >xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so out of d >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just relea >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people create 16- >they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still use WCNav.
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used by anyone.
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://www.ne
That's the nice thing. It allows you to add buttons, and features. But currently only in 16-bit. As you said, it could be a great tool.
Like AOLs front end, or the front end to a number of online games. I
think Santronics has pretty much moved away from the Nav so far.
Maybe we'll see them drop something new about it in the future.
On 6/16/03 10:20 AM, HENRIK GRAVERSEN wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting winse client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and energetic, maybe more people would use it.
Navigator is a potent marketing tool, IMHO. Clean interface, differentiation, perceived value.
32-bit would be very welcome. And one or two extra optional butto
the Connection Manager window pointing to http:// adresses of sysop choice would help make it work even better as a site specific navi
bar (e.g. one extra button for your real estate database, chat, etc).
Henrik
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of
xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so ou >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people creat
they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still use W
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used by an
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://
That's the nice thing. It allows you to add buttons, and features. But currently only in 16-bit. As you said, it could be a great tool.
Like AOLs front end, or the front end to a number of online games. I think Santronics has pretty much moved away from the Nav so far.
Maybe we'll see them drop something new about it in the future.
On 6/16/03 10:20 AM, HENRIK GRAVERSEN wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting winse client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and energetic, maybe more people would use it.
Navigator is a potent marketing tool, IMHO. Clean interface, differentiation, perceived value.
32-bit would be very welcome. And one or two extra optional butto
the Connection Manager window pointing to http:// adresses of sysop choice would help make it work even better as a site specific navi
bar (e.g. one extra button for your real estate database, chat, etc).
Henrik
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit world of >xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is so ou >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Maybe just >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people creat >they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still use W
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used by an
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS http://
Maybe if we showed interest we could pick it up? or what about
designing our own?
Dean Brooks
Hidden Paradise BBS
hpbbs.dns2go.com
I've considered this, but wasn't sure we could without some sort of resource to give us client server acces similar to the navigator. Currently the sdk only works through the current navigator, Correct?
On 6/22/03 1:17 AM, DEAN BROOKS wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
That's the nice thing. It allows you to add buttons, and featu currently only in 16-bit. As you said, it could be a great tool.
Like AOLs front end, or the front end to a number of online gam
think Santronics has pretty much moved away from the Nav so far.
Maybe we'll see them drop something new about it in the future.
On 6/16/03 10:20 AM, HENRIK GRAVERSEN wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and en
maybe more people would use it.
Navigator is a potent marketing tool, IMHO. Clean interface, differentiation, perceived value.
32-bit would be very welcome. And one or two extra optional
the Connection Manager window pointing to http:// adresses o
choice would help make it work even better as a site specifi
bar (e.g. one extra button for your real estate database, ch
Henrik
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit wor
xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Mayb >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people
they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS h
Maybe if we showed interest we could pick it up? or what about
designing our own?
Dean Brooks
Hidden Paradise BBS
hpbbs.dns2go.com
I've considered this, but wasn't sure we could without some sort of resource to give us client server acces similar to the navigator. Currently the sdk only works through the current navigator, Correct?
On 6/22/03 1:17 AM, DEAN BROOKS wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
That's the nice thing. It allows you to add buttons, and featu currently only in 16-bit. As you said, it could be a great tool. Like AOLs front end, or the front end to a number of online gam think Santronics has pretty much moved away from the Nav so far. Maybe we'll see them drop something new about it in the future.
On 6/16/03 10:20 AM, HENRIK GRAVERSEN wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
Yeah, but it would be a nice way to make some interesting client/server software, if it was 32-bit.
Plus, if it was 32-bi9t, and therefore more viable and en maybe more people would use it.
Navigator is a potent marketing tool, IMHO. Clean interface, differentiation, perceived value.
32-bit would be very welcome. And one or two extra optional
the Connection Manager window pointing to http:// adresses o choice would help make it work even better as a site specifi
bar (e.g. one extra button for your real estate database, ch
Henrik
On 6/16/03 1:33 AM, ARNAUD DE BONALD wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:28:11 -0400, PAUL KLINGLER wrote:
So, will the navigator ever advance to the 32-bit wor >xp, me, 2000, all being very commonly used, 16-bit is >Otherwise, it just makes the navigator useless. Mayb >source for writing a custom navigator, and let people >they desire.
well, personally, I don't see any good reason to still
I keep it for download on my system, but it's not used
--------------------
Arnaud de Bonald - Paris, France - Sysop Netcava BBS h
Maybe if we showed interest we could pick it up? or what about designing our own?
Dean Brooks
Hidden Paradise BBS
hpbbs.dns2go.com
Good question.. Hector? does the SDK only work through the current Navigator?
Dean Brooks
So can the navigator sdk work without the navigator?
On 6/30/03 9:05 PM, DEAN BROOKS wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
I've considered this, but wasn't sure we could without some sort of resource to give us client server acces similar to the navigator. Currently the sdk only works through the current navigator, Correct?
On 6/22/03 1:17 AM, DEAN BROOKS wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
That's the nice thing. It allows you to add buttons, and featu currently only in 16-bit. As you said, it could be a great tool. Like AOLs front end, or the front end to a number of online gam think Santronics has pretty much moved away from the Nav so far. Maybe we'll see them drop something new about it in the future.
On 6/16/03 10:20 AM, HENRIK GRAVERSEN wrote to PAUL KLINGLER:
But as far as I remember if you log in with the navigator things such a DB>IRC, ICQ etc. can not be used. I remember reading that somewhere just DB>can not remember where....
I guess now is this in fact true? If so then I think that would be a DB>problem. I know right now the ones using my system are telneting into DB>it. Back in the early days when MSI still had this software the DB>Navigator was used exclusively....
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,048 |
| Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 42:21:08 |
| Calls: | 236,049 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 60,363 |
| D/L today: |
12,128 files (2,212M bytes) |
| Messages: | 289,496 |
| Posted today: | 6 |