Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a key is pressed?
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a key is pressed?
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a key is pressed?
On 19 Sep 16 08:09:13, Roger Nelson said the following to All:
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a NA>RN> key is pressed?
Nope.
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a key
is pressed?
19 Sep 16 08:09, you wrote to All:
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a ml>RN> key is pressed?
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Re: BinkD
By: mark lewis to Roger Nelson on Mon Sep 19 2016 11:21:10
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Mine is 1.1a-94 Apr 4 2016. IPv6 capable
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Are you a practising member of the Church of Andre?
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a
key is pressed?
Nope.
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is
that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a
key is pressed?
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
Binkd 1.1a-27 (Jun 26 2013 16:38:28/Win32)
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is RN>RN> that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Are you a practising member of the Church of Andre?
I'm not a joiner, but what exactly is that?
19 Sep 16 12:24, you wrote to me:
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a
key is pressed?
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
Binkd 1.1a-27 (Jun 26 2013 16:38:28/Win32)
is that all you get from
binkd -vv
??
... Voles: the pest exterminators final frontier.
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Not drinking enough coffee can cause me to want to fall asleep. :)
Seriously, I have not seen that happen on either of my instances.
I am running two different versions (the latest DB on my BBS
instance) and the older version (on my DB hub).
This is due to the latest DB BinkD not enjoying the fact that I run
that instance on a different port than 24554.
BTW, my DB hub has been doing fantastic serving up WWIVnet to the
FTN community.
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is RN>RN> that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
Are you a practising member of the Church of Andre?
I'm not a joiner, but what exactly is that?
First you have to believe that Nick Andre has god-like
characteristics and take it from there.
People may find it stupid, but it sure is more fun than the church
of jesus christ and latter day saints.
First you have to believe that Nick Andre has god-like
characteristics and take it from there.
So you do believe in God. (-:0
First you have to believe that Nick Andre has god-like characteristics
and take it from there.
Binkd 1.1a-27 (Jun 26 2013 16:38:28/Win32)
Compilation flags: mingw32, perldl, https, ntlm, amiga_4d_outbound, bwlim, ipv6, fsp1035.
Facilities: fsp1035 ipv6
... Voles: the pest exterminators final frontier.
Voles = Plural of Russian boatmen.
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Mine is 1.1a-94 Apr 4 2016. IPv6 capable
Mine is from BINKDWIN EXE 279040 6-12-16 1:39p A
Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them until a NA>RN> key is pressed?
Nope.
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is that J and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
First you have to believe that Nick Andre has god-like
characteristics and take it from there.
So you do believe in God. (-:0
I do believe in the friendship that emanated from this man and which
lasts, although we only shared half an hour in our lives and a pizza.
20 Sep 16 04:57, you wrote to me:
Binkd 1.1a-27 (Jun 26 2013 16:38:28/Win32)
Compilation flags: mingw32, perldl, https, ntlm, amiga_4d_outbound, ml>RN> bwlim, ipv6, fsp1035.
Facilities: fsp1035 ipv6
ok... i know that at least -92 is out as that's what i'm running... i compiled my copy 31 Jan 2016... it sounds like it is time for an
update...
... Voles: the pest exterminators final frontier.
Voles = Plural of Russian boatmen.
interesting... they're also a digging critter similar to a mole...
https://www.google.com/search?q=vole
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Mon Sep 19 2016 17:10:37
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Mine is 1.1a-94 Apr 4 2016. IPv6 capable
Mine is from BINKDWIN EXE 279040 6-12-16 1:39p A
And you can substitute my version of Binkd, for yours. Rename it
Binkdwin and all is well. I have tested that.
On 19 Sep 16 10:22:35, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick & Ward:
until a key is pressed?Is anyone havine trouble with BinkD going to sleep on them
Nope.
Then the only conclusion I can draw from this vast amount of help is NA>RN> that Joe and I are somehow cursed? Don't you wonder what causes it?
There could be a few things. Is this happening with BinkD running as a service or just as a normal process?
If you have a multi-core CPU, try setting the affinity of BinkD to use
only one CPU core in Windows task manager.
The simular "D'Bridge falls asleep at midnight" problem is resolved this way.
Ensuring that you have a constant supply of beer in the fridge also
works.
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Mine is 1.1a-94 Apr 4 2016. IPv6 capable
Mine is from BINKDWIN EXE 279040 6-12-16 1:39p A
And you can substitute my version of Binkd, for yours. Rename it
Binkdwin and all is well. I have tested that.
But isn't that one still going to sleep on you?
...If you're eatin' Spam, you ain't eatin' ham.
Ensuring that you have a constant supply of beer in the fridge also
works.
Re: Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 21 2016 09:12:27
nope... what version of binkd are you running?
binkd -vv
Mine is 1.1a-94 Apr 4 2016. IPv6 capable
Mine is from BINKDWIN EXE 279040 6-12-16 1:39p A
And you can substitute my version of Binkd, for yours. Rename it
Binkdwin and all is well. I have tested that.
But isn't that one still going to sleep on you?
Yes, but so was the previous 92 version
But isn't that one still going to sleep on you?
Yes, but so was the previous 92 version
Then there is something else involved on both our systems. Try what Nick suggested to me and see if that works.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Thu Sep 22 2016 03:52:03
But isn't that one still going to sleep on you?
Yes, but so was the previous 92 version
Then there is something else involved on both our systems. Try what Nick suggested to me and see if that works.
I have no idea how to do so <G>
Then there is something else involved on both our systems. Try what
Nick suggested to me and see if that works.
I have no idea how to do so <G>
Are your ideas on vacation or are you waiting for me to tell you how to do it, when you have a servant right there in Ontario? (-:0
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Thu Sep 22 2016 11:02:15
Then there is something else involved on both our systems. Try what JD>RN>> Nick suggested to me and see if that works.
I have no idea how to do so <G>
Are your ideas on vacation or are you waiting for me to tell you how JD>RN> to do it, when you have a servant right there in Ontario? (-:0
I have a servant? I cant afford a servant <G>. I may have to google instead <G>
I have no idea how to do so <G>
Are your ideas on vacation or are you waiting for me to tell you
how to do it, when you have a servant right there in Ontario?
(-:0
I have a servant? I cant afford a servant <G>. I may have to
google instead <G>
Nick Andre's expertise is greater than mine, wouldn't you say? (-:
...You don't get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression.
Re: Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Thu Sep 22 2016 16:35:51
I have no idea how to do so <G>
Are your ideas on vacation or are you waiting for me to tell you
how to do it, when you have a servant right there in Ontario?
(-:0
I have a servant? I cant afford a servant <G>. I may have to
google instead <G>
Nick Andre's expertise is greater than mine, wouldn't you say? (-:
Better then mine as well I would think <G>
...You don't get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression.
Sometimes a second impression is better
Nick Andre's expertise is greater than mine, wouldn't you say? (-:
Better then mine as well I would think <G>
Ours combined. Our 1st step would be to run the Task manager. (-:
...You don't get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression.
Sometimes a second impression is better
Than what?
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 23 2016 04:05:24
Nick Andre's expertise is greater than mine, wouldn't you say? (-:
Better then mine as well I would think <G>
Ours combined. Our 1st step would be to run the Task manager. (-:
I see nothing in there that would accomplish said task
...You don't get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression.
Sometimes a second impression is better
Than what?
Than the first.
On 19 Sep 16 10:22:35, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick & Ward:
The simular "D'Bridge falls asleep at midnight" problem is resolved this way.
On Fri Sep-23-2016 13:24, Joe Delahaye (1:249/303) wrote to Roger
Nelson:
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 23 2016 04:05:24
Open the Task manager and find BinkD under the Processes tab and right-click on it. Third from the bottom (W7), you will see Set
Affinity. A list of the multiprocessors will be displayed with
their boxes checked. Uncheck all but the 1st one listed.
The simular "D'Bridge falls asleep at midnight" problem is resolved this way.
Will that be resolved in the next release?
On 23 Sep 16 14:53:11, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick
Andre:
The simular "D'Bridge falls asleep at midnight" problem is resolved this way.
Will that be resolved in the next release?
I seriously doubt it, but the rewrite would have none of these
problems.
Will that be resolved in the next release?I seriously doubt it, but the rewrite would have none of these
problems.
I see nothing in there that would accomplish said task
Open the Task manager and find BinkD under the Processes tab and right-click on
it. Third from the bottom (W7), you will see Set Affinity. A list of the multiprocessors will be displayed with their boxes checked. Uncheck all but the 1st one listed.
In W10, do the same thing, but when you right-click on the BinkD line, Set Affinity won't be there. In that window, however, there will be listed 4th from the top "Go to details". Click on that and you will have to right-click on BinkD again when those settings are presented and at that time, you will see Set Affinity.
"Hope this helps.
Keep us informed..."
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll still have to shut down all but one.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Nick Andre on Sat Sep 24 2016 05:45:06
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 23 2016 15:55:16
In W10, do the same thing, but when you right-click on the BinkD
line, Set Affinity won't be there. In that window, however, there
will be listed 4th from the top "Go to details". Click on that and
you will have to right-click on BinkD again when those settings
are presented and at that time, you will see Set Affinity.
See previous answer.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 23 2016 14:49:21
I see nothing in there that would accomplish said task
Open the Task manager and find BinkD under the Processes tab and right-click on it. Third from the bottom (W7), you will see Set
Affinity. A list of the multiprocessors will be displayed with
their boxes checked. Uncheck all but the 1st one listed.
Not found in Windows 10.
Perhaps elsewhere, but not in Taskbar in the location y9ou mention.
Found it. It's under the Details Tab instead.
Problem is that I have two items in there. All proccessors, and
CPU 0. If I uncheck either of those choices, both get unchecked.
So back to square One.
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have, but I was referring to the later models you use.
See previous answer.
Send me a screen shot.
Not found in Windows 10.
It's in my Windows 10. (-:
Perhaps elsewhere, but not in Taskbar in the location y9ou mention.
Where did I mention Taskbar?
Found it. It's under the Details Tab instead.
I posted them two different times so as not to confuse you. The 1st was for W7 and the 'Follow-up' was for W10.
Problem is that I have two items in there. All proccessors, and
CPU 0. If I uncheck either of those choices, both get unchecked.
So back to square One.
AHA! If you have nothing but that, then it is a single core processor and that
brings to mind another question if that one's BinkD is still going to sleep on you.
Is that your BBS machine? If so, what do your other machines show?
[For dual- and multicore processors]
If you unclick on the checked square that reads All processors, naturally it's going to turn them all off. While they are all unchecked, simply click on the one marked CPU 0 (that's the 1st one listed) at that point and you'll be fine.
If that doesn't work, then send me screen shots as I mentoned in the previous message.--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6262.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3972
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac142
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 06:59:33
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have, but I was referring to the later models you use.
Well, I could in THIS computer. Just not on the BBS machine where
Binkd runs <G>
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
@EEN-BY: 12/0 120/544 123/500 138/146 140/1 153/250 757 802 7715 203/0 @EEN-BY: 221/0 249/0 206 207 208 300 303 307 261/38 266/512 275/100 @EEN-BY: 288/34 322/756 342/77 3828/7
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6264.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3b46
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac148
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:53:37
Not found in Windows 10.
It's in my Windows 10. (-:
Perhaps elsewhere, but not in Taskbar in the location y9ou mention.
Where did I mention Taskbar?
Meant to write Task Manager. Sorry
Found it. It's under the Details Tab instead.
I posted them two different times so as not to confuse you. The 1st was for W7 and the 'Follow-up' was for W10.
Yes, but that came after I followed directions on you first message
Problem is that I have two items in there. All proccessors, and
CPU 0. If I uncheck either of those choices, both get unchecked.
So back to square One.
AHA! If you have nothing but that, then it is a single core
processor and
that
brings to mind another question if that one's BinkD is still going to sleep on you.
Yes
Is that your BBS machine? If so, what do your other machines show?
Yes. As stated in another message, this machine is a quad
processor, and it shows all 4
[For dual- and multicore processors]
If you unclick on the checked square that reads All processors,
naturally
it's going to turn them all off. While they are all unchecked, simply click on the one marked CPU 0 (that's the 1st one listed) at that point and you'll be fine.
Only if you have more then one <G> (as per your bracketed title for
this para. Single processor will turn both off or on, no matter if
you uncheck the All Processors, or CPU 0 checkmars,
If that doesn't work, then send me screen shots as I mentoned in the previous message.
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
@EEN-BY: 12/0 120/544 123/500 138/146 140/1 153/250 757 802 7715 203/0 @EEN-BY: 221/0 249/0 206 207 208 300 303 307 261/38 266/512 275/100 @EEN-BY: 288/34 322/756 342/77 3828/7
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6263.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d39ee
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac143
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:01:45
See previous answer.
Send me a screen shot.
Of what? the Details tab or the Set affinity setting? :)
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
@EEN-BY: 12/0 120/544 123/500 138/146 140/1 153/250 757 802 7715 203/0 @EEN-BY: 221/0 249/0 206 207 208 300 303 307 261/38 266/512 275/100 @EEN-BY: 288/34 322/756 342/77 3828/7
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:53:37
Not found in Windows 10.
It's in my Windows 10. (-:
Perhaps elsewhere, but not in Taskbar in the location y9ou mention.
Where did I mention Taskbar?
Meant to write Task Manager. Sorry
Found it. It's under the Details Tab instead.
I posted them two different times so as not to confuse you. The 1st was for W7 and the 'Follow-up' was for W10.
Yes, but that came after I followed directions on you first message
Problem is that I have two items in there. All proccessors, and
CPU 0. If I uncheck either of those choices, both get unchecked.
So back to square One.
AHA! If you have nothing but that, then it is a single core
processor and that brings to mind another question if that one's
BinkD is still going to sleep on you.
Yes
Is that your BBS machine? If so, what do your other machines show?
Yes. As stated in another message, this machine is a quad
processor, and it shows all 4
[For dual- and multicore processors]
If you unclick on the checked square that reads All processors,
naturally it's going to turn them all off. While they are all
unchecked, simply click on the one marked CPU 0 (that's the 1st
one listed) at that point and you'll be fine.
Only if you have more then one <G> (as per your bracketed title for
this para. Single processor will turn both off or on, no matter if
you uncheck the All Processors, or CPU 0 checkmars,
If that doesn't work, then send me screen shots as I mentoned in the previous message.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:01:45
See previous answer.
Send me a screen shot.
Of what? the Details tab or the Set affinity setting? :)
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 06:59:33
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have, but I was referring to the later models you use.
Well, I could in THIS computer. Just not on the BBS machine where
Binkd runs <G>
This message is a dupe.
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6262.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3972
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac142
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 06:59:33
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have,
but I was referring to the later models you use.
Well, I could in THIS computer. Just not on the BBS machine where
Binkd runs <G>
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
@EEN-BY: 12/0 120/544 123/500 138/146 140/1 153/250 757 802 7715
203/0 @EEN-BY: 221/0 249/0 206 207 208 300 303 307 261/38 266/512
275/100 @EEN-BY: 288/34 322/756 342/77 3828/7
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
This message is a dupe.
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6264.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3b46
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac148
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:53:37
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
AHA! If you have nothing but that, then it is a single core
processor and that brings to mind another question if that one's
BinkD is still going to sleep on you.
Yes
Then something else is at play here and I don't want to venture what it is. I hope Nick reads this.
Is that your BBS machine? If so, what do your other machines show?
Yes. As stated in another message, this machine is a quad
processor, and it shows all 4
I'm lost. I thought you wrote (and meant) that your BBS machine was a single core processor.
Path from here should got directly to Janis. I do send to /307 as he is one of my downlinks, but if it was a dupe from me, it should have Janis in the path
Will that be resolved in the next release?I seriously doubt it, but the rewrite would have none of these problems.
I've sent via courier a skid of the worst beer I could find. You will be able to quit your job and do nothing but drink and code the re-write.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 12:09:36
This message is a dupe.
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6264.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3b46
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac148
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 07:53:37
********************
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
Path from here should got directly to Janis. I do send to /307 as
he is one of my downlinks, but if it was a dupe from me, it should
have Janis in the path
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 12:11:13
AHA! If you have nothing but that, then it is a single core
processor and that brings to mind another question if that one's
BinkD is still going to sleep on you.
I'm lost. I thought you wrote (and meant) that your BBS machine was a single core processor.
You think correctly. BBS machine is single core. The machine I'm writing this one is quad core.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 12:08:26
This message is a dupe.
@TZUTC: -0400
@MSGID: 6262.dbridge@1:249/303 1c4d3972
@REPLY: 1:3828/7.0 7e7ac142
@PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Win32 Aug 4 2016 MSC
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.19 Aug 4 2016 MSC 1800
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 06:59:33
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have,
but I was referring to the later models you use.
Well, I could in THIS computer. Just not on the BBS machine where
Binkd runs <G>
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
@EEN-BY: 12/0 120/544 123/500 138/146 140/1 153/250 757 802 7715
203/0 @EEN-BY: 221/0 249/0 206 207 208 300 303 307 261/38 266/512
275/100 @EEN-BY: 288/34 322/756 342/77 3828/7
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
And what is the Path on the other one?
___ SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
- Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)
On 24 Sep 16 17:09:56, Shawn Highfield said the following to Nick
Andre:
Will that be resolved in the next release?
I seriously doubt it, but the rewrite would have none of these problems.
I've sent via courier a skid of the worst beer I could find. You will be able to quit your job and do nothing but drink and code the re-write.
Some of my best work is done while drunk.
Some of my best work is done while drunk.
Are you alone at that time?
BTW, I've been meaning to thank you for the perfection with which DBUTIL wo
On 26 Sep 16 06:31:15, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick Andre:
Some of my best work is done while drunk.
Are you alone at that time?
Mostly, yes.
BTW, I've been meaning to thank you for the perfection with which
DBUTIL wo
The motivation for perfecting it, comes from no longer hearing about
it...
:)
Some of my best work is done while drunk.
Send me a screen shot.
Of what? the Details tab or the Set affinity setting? :)
Both -- before and after, but do not save their settings and let me know if what you are sending is from your BBS machine, since that's the one in question, unless you're running BinkD on more than one of your machines.
Thanks. Mine is an Intel dual-core processor. Joe's may be
quad-core, but I don't think that would make a difference. He'll
still have to shut down all but one.
Seems that the BBS computer is a single core. AM2+ or AM3. Too
long ago to remember Device Manager tells me it's an AMD K8 Athlon
64 processor 3500+
So, I guess shutting down any processors is out of the question <G>
I don't know about the processors in all of the machines you have,
but I was referring to the later models you use.
Well, I could in THIS computer. Just not on the BBS machine where
Binkd runs <G>
If BinkD runs only on your BBS machine and that machine has a single processor,
meaning not dual- or quad-core, then something else is wrong on both our systems. For the time being, we <cough> could call it The Ghost in the Machine. That said, I made the change and have noticed no sleepiness on the part of D'Bridge or BinkD. Time marches on.
Path from here should got directly to Janis. I do send to /307 as he
is one of my downlinks, but if it was a dupe from me, it should have
Janis in the path
/307 is also connected here and it seems he has connected us together as well. I have netmailed him and asked him not to export messages to my node that he has exported elsewhere.
I think he needs to sit down with his setup and decide how to do whatever it is he needs to do.
@ATH: 249/303 307 153/757 7715 140/1 3828/7
Path from here should got directly to Janis. I do send to /307 as
he is one of my downlinks, but if it was a dupe from me, it should
have Janis in the path
I know that. I was alerting you to the fact that one of your downlinks has something misconfigured.
You think correctly. BBS machine is single core. The machine I'm
writing this one is quad core.
Then the problem with your BBS machine, which is single core, is not at fault as far as setting affinity goes. I wonder if it's W Defender or some other anti virus program causing it?
PATH: 249/303 203/0 221/1 0 140/1 3828/7
There's also another one:
PATH: 249/303 203/0 2320/100 123/500 140/1 3828/7
So, I don't see the direct to Janis path. <ducking>
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 12:16:31
Send me a screen shot.
Of what? the Details tab or the Set affinity setting? :)
Both -- before and after, but do not save their settings and let me know if what you are sending is from your BBS machine, since that's the
one in question, unless you're running BinkD on more than one of
your machines.
Check your inbox. should (hopefully) be there
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 12:20:44
If BinkD runs only on your BBS machine and that machine has a single processor, meaning not dual- or quad-core, then something else is
wrong on both our systems. For the time being, we <cough> could
call it The Ghost in the Machine. That said, I made the change and
have noticed no sleepiness on the part of D'Bridge or BinkD. Time
marches on.
Yep. It does not happen often, but it does happen
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Mon Sep 26 2016 06:04:58
I know that. I was alerting you to the fact that one of your
downlinks has something misconfigured.
That would be /307 I would think. Something is being changed,
since that should have been caught as a dupe first hop after him.
Seems he has been contacted already <G>
Re: BinkD
By: Alan Ianson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Sep 25 2016 13:37:01
Seems he is changing something then, otherwise it would be caught
as a dupe.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Mon Sep 26 2016 06:07:57
I'm using the M$ antivirus and nothing else. Nothing else uses
that port though
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Mon Sep 26 2016 06:24:00
PATH: 249/303 203/0 221/1 0 140/1 3828/7
There's also another one:
PATH: 249/303 203/0 2320/100 123/500 140/1 3828/7
So, I don't see the direct to Janis path. <ducking>
No, not in that case, since I also connect to Bjorn
Check your inbox. should (hopefully) be there
I have them. Your BBS machine is single-core (as if you didn't know).
P.S. 5 more dupes here yesterday from you. I deleted them.
Yep. It does not happen often, but it does happen
Then something else is wrong.
That would be /307 I would think. Something is being changed,
since that should have been caught as a dupe first hop after him.
I haven't seen the change (-:[
Seems he has been contacted already <G>
By whom (if you know)?
Seems he is changing something then, otherwise it would be caught
as a dupe.
Gee, I wonder what that could be?
I'm using the M$ antivirus and nothing else. Nothing else uses
that port though
Meaning Defender. What about port 24555?
PATH: 249/303 203/0 221/1 0 140/1 3828/7
There's also another one:
PATH: 249/303 203/0 2320/100 123/500 140/1 3828/7
No, not in that case, since I also connect to Bjorn
Some of your messages here do go to her and then Bob and then to me.
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:07:25
Yep. It does not happen often, but it does happen
Then something else is wrong.
Windows 10??
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:10:43
That would be /307 I would think. Something is being changed,
since that should have been caught as a dupe first hop after him.
I haven't seen the change (-:[
Seems he has been contacted already <G>
By whom (if you know)?
Cant remember at the moment, but in another echo I believe. Might
have been Wilfred, or mark.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:13:05
Seems he is changing something then, otherwise it would be caught
as a dupe.
Gee, I wonder what that could be?
If I knew, I would tell him
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:14:36
I'm using the M$ antivirus and nothing else. Nothing else uses
that port though
Meaning Defender. What about port 24555?
Only time that is used, is when I call Janis, or when I activate
DB, or Irex
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:16:05
PATH: 249/303 203/0 221/1 0 140/1 3828/7
There's also another one:
PATH: 249/303 203/0 2320/100 123/500 140/1 3828/7
So, I don't see the direct to Janis path. <ducking>
No, not in that case, since I also connect to Bjorn
Some of your messages here do go to her and then Bob and then to me.
Depends on which arrives first I guess <G>
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Wed Sep 28 2016 07:18:52
Check your inbox. should (hopefully) be there
I have them. Your BBS machine is single-core (as if you didn't know).
P.S. 5 more dupes here yesterday from you. I deleted them.
Took a lot of effort for netmails, including yours, to leave here.
For some reason, binkd did not see them, or just ignored them. Had
to load Irex, which sent some stuff immedidately, then did a rescan
with irex, and it sent the rest. I dont know if this is all
invovled with the problem I was having with windows 10, Cortana and Windows start menu, meant no apps would work. A system restore
point from several days ago, fixed it after several other tries
and directions failed to do so.
On 26 Sep 16 21:43:32, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick
Andre:
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Doing very good, in grade five now! Loves school,
Quoting Joe Delahaye to Roger Nelson <=-
the problem I was having with windows 10, Cortana and Windows start
menu, meant no apps would work. A system restore point from several
days ago, fixed it after several other tries and directions failed to
Quoting Nick Andre to Roger Nelson <=-
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Doing very good, in grade five now! Loves school,
Andre:
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Doing very good, in grade five now! Loves school,
10 years old! Time marches on. These are formative years for her and no doubt she is a joy to be around. Daughters usually are.
Quoting Nick Andre to Roger Nelson <=-
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Doing very good, in grade five now! Loves school,
I still remember the ultra sound picture in D'Bridge installer.
All kidding aside (don't abbreviate that), I believe the problem lies either with the system or the BinkD program. Mine seems to have gone away, so I put the affinity back the way it was. This was probably due to some W7 and W10 update that came it.
Seems he has been contacted already <G>
By whom (if you know)?
Cant remember at the moment, but in another echo I believe. Might
have been Wilfred, or mark.
Or John Doe.
Seems he is changing something then, otherwise it would be caught
as a dupe.
Gee, I wonder what that could be?
If I knew, I would tell him
Don't forget to tell me. (-:
Meaning Defender. What about port 24555?
Only time that is used, is when I call Janis, or when I activate
DB, or Irex
Do you allow inbound calls on that port?
PATH: 249/303 203/0 221/1 0 140/1 3828/7
There's also another one:
PATH: 249/303 203/0 2320/100 123/500 140/1 3828/7
No, not in that case, since I also connect to Bjorn
Some of your messages here do go to her and then Bob and then to me.
Depends on which arrives first I guess <G>
Huh?
Took a lot of effort for netmails, including yours, to leave here.
For some reason, binkd did not see them, or just ignored them. Had
to load Irex, which sent some stuff immedidately, then did a rescan
with irex, and it sent the rest. I dont know if this is all
invovled with the problem I was having with windows 10, Cortana and
Windows start menu, meant no apps would work. A system restore
point from several days ago, fixed it after several other tries
and directions failed to do so.
Well. at least they went. Had you tried shutting BinkD down first and restarting it?
the problem I was having with windows 10, Cortana and Windows start
menu, meant no apps would work. A system restore point from several
days ago, fixed it after several other tries and directions failed
to
This is why in a couple of weeks I'm spending the time to take my "Server" machine back to a linux desktop. I enjoy windows 10 on my laptop and have zero problems with it, find it fast stable etc. But on the "server" the updates, the screw ups seem to never stop.
I still remember the ultra sound picture in D'Bridge installer.Yep that was a long time ago but seems like yesterday!
LOL! Except when she hogs the bathroom in the morning!
Hello Nick!
29 Sep 16 09:37, you wrote to me:
I still remember the ultra sound picture in D'Bridge installer.Yep that was a long time ago but seems like yesterday!
Scary. ;) I miss my daughter, we're currently not speaking. Life goes on I suppose.
LOL! Except when she hogs the bathroom in the morning!
So ... how many years ago were you kicked out of the bathroom? 8-]
LOL! Except when she hogs the bathroom in the morning!
So ... how many years ago were you kicked out of the bathroom? 8-]
Around the time she started school and suddenly things like hairstyles, earrings and what matching shirt and pants became of importance to her...
On 29 Sep 16 05:40:06, Roger Nelson said the following to Nick
Andre:
How is that adorable little girl of yours?
Doing very good, in grade five now! Loves school,
10 years old! Time marches on. These are formative years for her and no doubt she is a joy to be around. Daughters usually are.
LOL! Except when she hogs the bathroom in the morning!
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Thu Sep 29 2016 05:07:20
All kidding aside (don't abbreviate that), I believe the problem lies either with the system or the BinkD program. Mine seems to have
gone away, so I put the affinity back the way it was. This was
probably due to some W7 and W10 update that came it.
Possible. Noticed last night when I went to read my mail, that the
BBS was offline for some reason. Told me that a cable was
unplugged, It wasn't, but I replaced it anyway, and ran the troubleshooter again. Same answer. Ended up rebooting, and that
fixed it. Really weird. Just suddenly decided to do that.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Thu Sep 29 2016 05:23:50
Seems he has been contacted already <G>
By whom (if you know)?
Cant remember at the moment, but in another echo I believe. Might
have been Wilfred, or mark.
Or John Doe.
Dont know that guy <G>
Possible. Noticed last night when I went to read my mail, that the
BBS was offline for some reason. Told me that a cable was
unplugged, It wasn't, but I replaced it anyway, and ran the
troubleshooter again. Same answer. Ended up rebooting, and that
fixed it. Really weird. Just suddenly decided to do that.
This may or may not help, but do you have an anti virus boot disk or thumb drive?
Cant remember at the moment, but in another echo I believe. Might
have been Wilfred, or mark.
Or John Doe.
Dont know that guy <G>
He's everywhere, just like Kilroy.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 30 2016 05:33:45
Possible. Noticed last night when I went to read my mail, that the
BBS was offline for some reason. Told me that a cable was
unplugged, It wasn't, but I replaced it anyway, and ran the
troubleshooter again. Same answer. Ended up rebooting, and that
fixed it. Really weird. Just suddenly decided to do that.
This may or may not help, but do you have an anti virus boot disk
or thumb drive?
I do, but time to update it I think <G>
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Fri Sep 30 2016 05:35:26
Cant remember at the moment, but in another echo I believe. Might
have been Wilfred, or mark.
Or John Doe.
Dont know that guy <G>
He's everywhere, just like Kilroy.
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
Or John Doe.
Dont know that guy <G>
He's everywhere, just like Kilroy.
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sat Oct 01 2016 11:30:13
Or John Doe.
Dont know that guy <G>
He's everywhere, just like Kilroy.
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses, after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the populace.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sat Oct 01 2016 23:04:14
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
To Nick: I'm about to make an experiment with the DB editor. I have tried with timEd/386, but I want to make sure of the result before I report it.
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
I suppose what I wrote was a dead giveaway.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Sun Oct 02 2016 12:48:09
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
I suppose what I wrote was a dead giveaway.
Ohhh. Punny <G>
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
I suppose what I wrote was a dead giveaway.
Ohhh. Punny <G>
I guess I should be sent to the pun-itentiary.
Re: BinkD
By: Roger Nelson to Joe Delahaye on Mon Oct 03 2016 09:24:25
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
I suppose what I wrote was a dead giveaway.
Ohhh. Punny <G>
I guess I should be sent to the pun-itentiary.
You would have great Cell service there <G>
Yeah, they even have warrants issued in that name <G>
And his twin sister, Jane.
Does that make them popular, or just plain bad people?
If by bad you mean smell that way, then yes. They are corpses,
after all. That would of necessity make them unpopular with the
populace.
Not always corpses. A "john doe" warrant simply gives the police
the power to search and arrest, since they dont have a name
I suppose what I wrote was a dead giveaway.
Ohhh. Punny <G>
I guess I should be sent to the pun-itentiary.
You would have great Cell service there <G>
Not touching that one.
Hi all,
as a newbie (less than a week using D'bridge) I have an issue with D'bridge and would like some help.*
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,034 |
| Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 144:11:50 |
| Calls: | 671 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 95,163 |
| D/L today: |
840 files (225M bytes) |
| Messages: | 297,672 |