If I was running something like ProBoard is there any alternatives to get something working?
QWK networking depends on having a QWK system either built into the BBS or >added on via a door perhaps, it doesn't really matter what type of message >base you use.
In my experience Mystic and MagickaBBS both support QWK natively and use JAM >bases.
Synchronet also supports QWK using the Synchronet message base format.
You went from QWK networking to regular QWK in this reply :)
If he wants to be a node, he might be interested in FidoQWK, which converts QWK packet to PKT files and vice versa. He would still need
and FTN echomail processor.
Why not give SearchLight a try with the Valence QWK mail door, which allows for both QWK hubbing as well as for tossing and scanning
net-status QWK hubs :)
Is searchLight still supported/updated/registerable?
Why not give SearchLight a try with the Valence QWK mail door, which allows for both QWK hubbing as well as for tossing and scanning net-status QWK hubs :)
Is Valence the door that William McBrine wrote? Looks interesting but I know >nothing about SearchLight so my best bet is that is not going to happen.
Is searchLight still supported/updated/registerable?
It's not updated or supported anymore, but if you know where to look,
you can get the key for version 5.1 that allows it to have an
unlimited numbers of users/
It's not updated or supported anymore, but if you know where to look,
you can get the key for version 5.1 that allows it to have an
unlimited numbers of users/
Just ask you. XD
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,049 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 97:01:49 |
Calls: | 235,753 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 60,336 |
D/L today: |
203 files (562M bytes) |
Messages: | 20,616,130,550 |
Posted today: | 3 |