1. When SVDM uses an inherited socket (the -h option) no telnetI'll be committing a change here to address that - basically send the Telnet commands to re-negotiate those operating parameters (the same sequence that happens when answering an incoming Telnet connection).
negotiations are done.
I added 2 new .ini settings for you to play with:
- MainLoopDelay (default: 0, set to 1+ to add CPU yield)
- SocketSelectTimeout (default: 0, set to 1+ to add CPU yield)
Re: SVDM - Which SBBSEXEC.DLL and DOSXTRN.EXE version?
By: Digital Man to Fzf on Mon Mar 25 2024 04:27 pm
1. When SVDM uses an inherited socket (the -h option) no telnetI'll be committing a change here to address that - basically send the Telnet commands to re-negotiate those operating parameters (the same sequence that happens when answering an incoming Telnet connection).
negotiations are done.
It addresses the local configuration but unfortunately it still doesn't set remote options. The remote is usually going to be in binary mode but SVDM has the remote option set to ASCII by default. A CR from the remote then gets held up until a second byte is sent.
Sending a DO TX_BINARY near the WILL TX_BINARY when in ServerBinary mode and sending a DONT TX_BINARY when not in ServerBinary but using an external socket sets the remote options to appropriately match what SVDM is expecting. Clients might not like having their TX binary mode turned off mid session, but if someone is disabling binary mode on the server side they are already doing something weird.
It also sets the remote to binary when SVDM answers in listen mode. At the moment it leaves the remote TX in ASCII at all times.
I added 2 new .ini settings for you to play with:
- MainLoopDelay (default: 0, set to 1+ to add CPU yield)
- SocketSelectTimeout (default: 0, set to 1+ to add CPU yield)
These work perfectly, thanks! Just a simple 1 ms delay in the main loop drops CPU usage to 0% most of the time.
I also looked into the error 122 in the SBBSEXEC input_thread when SVDM gets pushed hard, such as during a file transfer. A little additional information on the next waiting mailslot message makes it pretty clear. Sorry, these are going to wrap oddly:
SBBS: !input_thread: ReadFile Error 122 (space=9411, count=0, nextsize=10000, waiting=46)
SBBS: !input_thread: ReadFile Error 122 (space=1211, count=0, nextsize=5056, waiting=45)
SBBS: !input_thread: ReadFile Error 122 (space=9635, count=0, nextsize=10000, waiting=26)
Etc. There's just not enough space in the ring buffer at the time.
these messages are harmless, the sheer number of them can help thrash a CPU pretty good right at a time when the CPU is busy. I changed the logging to log error 122 at a lower priority so it can be squelched out unless debugging is needed. That further drops the CPU usage when the SVDM is processing a lot of data.
Does your gitlab accept anonymous updates, or can I send you a diff?
Thanks again for all your work on this!
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,036 |
Nodes: | 15 (1 / 14) |
Uptime: | 128:12:33 |
Calls: | 666 |
Calls today: | 14 |
Files: | 95,162 |
D/L today: |
1,758 files (245M bytes) |
Messages: | 299,235 |
Posted today: | 8 |