Anyone out there using Seal386 Version 0.50?
Anyone out there using Seal386 Version 0.50?
Yes, as far as I'm someone... :-)
I'm still using it on my DOS system for areafixing. The file
ticker part had too many bugs, I replaced it with filescan
several years ago. Any further questions, or why do you ask?
Yep...but I started w/.40 and converted. .50 does something
wrong w/syntax in the initial cfg/ini file on a fresh
install that I'll bet is biting you.
Anyone out there using Seal386 Version 0.50?
I'm still using it on my DOS system for areafixing. The file ticker part ha too many bugs, I replaced it with filescan several years ago. Any further
Well, the problem I'm having is it will not auto-add new echo areas I recei that end up in my BADMSG area. Now regular echo areas from my fidonet uplin works fine, but I've setup a Fidonet-Internet gateway, so the new newsgroup areas ending up in my BADMSG area, Seal won't auto-add areas to squish.cfg.
Anyone out there using Seal386 Version 0.50?
Well, the problem I'm having is it will not auto-add new echo areas I receiving that end up in my BADMSG area. Now regular echo areas from
my fidonet uplink works fine, but I've setup a Fidonet-Internet
gateway, so the new newsgroups areas ending up in my BADMSG area, Seal won't auto-add areas to squish.cfg.
Ideas?
I'm still using it on my DOS system for areafixing. The file ticker
part ha too many bugs, I replaced it with filescan several years ago.
Any further
I haven't noticed any problem with mine doing anything wrong. I hub
mail for a
few nets and I use it to send out tic's when new files come in. What
was yours
doing when you ran it?
Ideas?
I use it here, patched for the Runtime error 200.
Make sure that the from: address on the BADMSGS is defined
as an EchoFeed in SEALCFG. Make sure the feed is allowed to
auto-create. Make sure a base path is defined to tell SEAL
=where= to auto-create. Make sure that definition includes
a pointer to a "forwarding list" that contains the tags and
descriptions in an .NA-style format. If you've those
covered, then check the logs after a SEAL BAD run to see if
it is telling you specifically what it doesn't like. Once
in a blue moon, there's more in the logs regarding an error
than what echoes to the screen.
Honestly: I cannot remember at all, it's too long ago. I
just know that I went for FileScan because of that.
I use it here, patched for the Runtime error 200.
How do I get the patch? I see your over seas. :)
Wednesday June 22 2005, Steve Asher writes to Kevin Klement:
I use it here, patched for the Runtime error 200.
How do I get the patch? I see your over seas. :)
http://www.brain.uni-freiburg.de/~klaus/pascal/runerr200/dow
nload.html (
http://www.brain.uni-freiburg.de/~klaus/pascal/runerr200/tpp
atch.zip )
Only needed if you get a "Runtime Error 200" message using a
fast Pentium. Handy for other doors & programs.
Honestly: I cannot remember at all, it's too long ago. I
just know that I went for FileScan because of that.
That it wouldn't auto-create areas with newsgroups?
22 Jun 05 22:22, Marty Blankenship wrote to Gerrit Kuehn:
I'm still using it on my DOS system for areafixing. The file ticker
part ha too many bugs, I replaced it with filescan several years ago.
Any further
I haven't noticed any problem with mine doing anything wrong. I hub
mail for a
few nets and I use it to send out tic's when new files come in. What
was yours
doing when you ran it?
Honestly: I cannot remember at all, it's too long ago. I just know
that I went for FileScan because of that.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,024 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 00:04:14 |
Calls: | 503,341 |
Calls today: | 10 |
Files: | 107,032 |
D/L today: |
28,751 files (1,966M bytes) |
Messages: | 441,538 |
Posted today: | 4 |