aren't there header files on the warp4 cd for those of us who want
to code/break programs for our systems?
aren't there header files on the warp4 cd for those of us who want to code/break programs for our systems? for some reason i'm thinking
that there are... these should also be accurate for use on a warp3
system, right?
aren't there header files on the warp4 cd for those of us who want to code/break programs for our systems? for some reason i'm thinking
that there are...
these should also be accurate for use on a warp3 system, right?
No, there aren't...You'll get them with your
(C) compiler...
they didn't come with gcc/emx... there ARE some on one of the
release cds but i don't remember where or which one... i now own
most all of them...
aren't there header files on the warp4 cd for
those of us who want to code/break programs
for our systems?
No, there aren't...You'll get them with your
(C) compiler...
No, there aren't...You'll get them with your
(C) compiler...
they didn't come with gcc/emx...
there ARE some on one of the release
cds but i don't remember where or which one... i now own most all of them...
they didn't come with gcc/emx...
They should be in your x:\emx\include directory, with names
like os2.h, os2tk.h, pm.h, etc.
hummm... i have those... in the past, i have tried compiling programs
that are supposed to compile under emx... but i've always had
problems... it's been a year or so and i've completely forgotten all
the specifics... but i do remember that i had problems that seemingly could be attributed to not having the headers, libraries, etc... necessary...
Also, ensure you have set
C_INCLUDE_PATH [that name is case sensitive and must be all
capital letters] correctly in your environment variables,
typically in CONFIG.SYS, using *forward slashes* to delineate
subdirectories within a path. On my system it reads:
yup, got all that...
welp, here, lets try this...
i've a copy of dmake here that comes precompiled with emx 0.9a... i
simply want to (re)compile it with my emx 0.9d (if i remember it
right)... in the dmake stuff, there's a couple of make.cmd files... i choose to compile under emx... looking at the proper make.cmd for the
emx compilation, i see the following...
gcc -c -I. -Iemx -DOS2 -U__GNUC__ -Zmtd -O infer.c
but that line produces the following error...
H:\dmake >gcc -c -I. -Iemx -DOS2 -U__GNUC__ -Zmtd -O infer.c
In file included from extern.h:66,
from infer.c:40:
emx\public.h:161: conflicting types for `_chdir' H:\EMX\INCLUDE\stdlib.h:194: previous declaration of `_chdir'
ok... ??? i know what it says... i remember digging around and
locating the differences... i remember posting almost this exact
question but i never got any type of answers in assistance... this
isn't my code... i simply want to compile it...
one of my reasons for wanting to use dmake is that i've been unable to
get any other makes running and i don't have any kind of "unix
toolboxes or utilities" installed... yet... another project that i
want to do is to (re)compile my Apache web server... that'll be a fun
one, to say the least <<GG>>
so, back up there... that's only one and i can only work thru one at a time ;-)
They should be in your x:\emx\include directory, with names
like os2.h, os2tk.h, pm.h, etc.
hummm... i have those... in the past, i have tried compiling programs
that are supposed to compile under emx... but i've always had
problems... it's been a year or so and i've completely forgotten all
the specifics... but i do remember that i had problems that seemingly
could be attributed to not having the headers, libraries, etc...
necessary...
Make sure you have EMX 0.9d with fix pack #3 applied.
gcc -c -I. -Iemx -DOS2 -U__GNUC__ -Zmtd -O infer.c
but that line produces the following error...
H:\dmake >gcc -c -I. -Iemx -DOS2 -U__GNUC__ -Zmtd -O infer.c
In file included from extern.h:66,
from infer.c:40:
emx\public.h:161: conflicting types for `_chdir'
H:\EMX\INCLUDE\stdlib.h:194: previous declaration of `_chdir'
This is a bug in EMX, but it seems to be fixed in fix pack #3.
In fact, public.h appears to have disappeared.
ok... ??? i know what it says... i remember digging around and
locating the differences... i remember posting almost this exact
question but i never got any type of answers in assistance... this
isn't my code... i simply want to compile it...
Apply fix pack #3 to EMX.
one of my reasons for wanting to use dmake is that i've been unable to
get any other makes running and i don't have any kind of "unix
toolboxes or utilities" installed... yet... another project that i
want to do is to (re)compile my Apache web server... that'll be a fun
one, to say the least <<GG>>
Yuk.
so, back up there... that's only one and i can only work thru one at a
time ;-)
I have the source to DMAKE here. I'll have a go at compiling
it and see what happens.
Hi mark,
Replying to a message of mark lewis to Andre Grueneberg:
No, there aren't...You'll get them with your
(C) compiler...
they didn't come with gcc/emx...
They should be in your x:\emx\include directory, with names
like os2.h, os2tk.h, pm.h, etc.
Also, ensure you have set
C_INCLUDE_PATH [that name is case sensitive and must be all
capital letters] correctly in your environment variables,
typically in CONFIG.SYS, using *forward slashes* to delineate subdirectories within a path. On my system it reads:
Make sure you have EMX 0.9d with fix pack #3 applied.
hummm... i've not seen the FP3 for the full development package...
i'll have to see if i can hunt it down... i've seen the one for the runtime, though <G>
H:\EMX\INCLUDE\stdlib.h:194: previous declaration of `_chdir'
This is a bug in EMX, but it seems to be fixed in fix pack #3.
In fact, public.h appears to have disappeared.
ummm, public.h is a dmake file...
want to do is to (re)compile my Apache web server... that'll be a
fun one, to say the least <<GG>>
Yuk.
yuk? is that all? <<GG>>
OH! i forgot earlier and just located this...
========== /dmake/emx/setup.cmd ==========
set C_INCLUDE_PATH=h:/emx/include;h:/toolkt21/c/os2h
set LIBRARY_PATH=h:/emx/lib
set OS=emx
========== end quote ==========
looks like i need to find out what 'toolkt21' is also???
toolboxes or utilities" installed... yet... another project that i
want to do is to (re)compile my Apache web server... that'll be a fun
one, to say the least <<GG>>
Make sure you have EMX 0.9d with fix pack #3 applied.
Make sure you have EMX 0.9d with fix pack #3 applied.
how can i check what version/fixpak i have installed??
Make sure you have EMX 0.9d with fix pack #3 applied.
how can i check what version/fixpak i have installed??
Check your x:\emx\doc directory and look for emxfix03.doc --
if it's there you have applied fixpack #3.
Check your x:\emx\doc directory and look for emxfix03.doc --
if it's there you have applied fixpack #3.
that's what i've run into before... i could locate the runtime fixes
but not the full package fixes...
how can i check what version/fixpak i have installed??
how can i check what version/fixpak i have installed??
use emxrev.cmd (interesting to look into the source) and you
get the version numbers of all emx dlls as output.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,028 |
Nodes: | 17 (1 / 16) |
Uptime: | 183:12:47 |
Calls: | 503,706 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 158,907 |
D/L today: |
16,813 files (4,893M bytes) |
Messages: | 444,393 |
Posted today: | 3 |