NOTE: IceEdit 2.35 M16251
Hello all,
Another file area question for you.
I have one area for BBS doors, and whenever I use a
utility to import the file_id.diz descriptions fbp.exe
fails when it gets to the door area.
Is there anyway to make FBP log what's going on so I
can delete the offending file? Right now I just have
to have all descriptions blank to make it continue
through the rest of the areas.
I had a similar problem fbn.exe. Couldn't work it out. I switched
to fb.exe (16 bit version) and it processed all areas ok.
I had a similar problem fbn.exe. Couldn't work it out. I switched
to fb.exe (16 bit version) and it processed all areas ok.
NOTE: IceEdit 2.35 M16251
I had a similar problem fbn.exe. Couldn't work it out. I switched
to fb.exe (16 bit version) and it processed all areas ok.
It processed all areas but only did a set number, but
I was able to figure out the offending files this way!
All working correctly again, thanks for the idea!
Hmm. Would probably be a good idea to add some debugging
functionality into the fb utility. I'll add that to the wishlist.
What was the problem with the file / description that caused fb to fail ?
What was the problem with the file / description
that caused fb to fail ?
Honestly I'm not sure. I'm thinking it was either
too long or had too much high ascii in it. There were
6 all told in there, and I just kept manually editing
them down to the bare basics until it finished.
If it would help I can certainly post or email you a
couple of the offending file_id.diz's?
Can I download those files (containing the file_id.diz's) somewhere ?
Can I download those files (containing the file_id.diz's) somewhere ?
Yep. From http://t1ny.kicks-ass.org:9080/files in
the doors section grab "abyss010.zip" and "apok.zip".
Those are the first two that fb got stuck on, there are
others I can hunt down again if you want them.
(You can also telnet to t1ny.kicks-ass.org for the
BBS interface if you would rather download that way).
I reached the website, but couldn't download the file. Internet
Explorer timedout for some reason.
Maybe I should try reproducing your error by importing via MFM but
I'm too lazy.
Btw do you have Arrowbridge I working ?
Hello Mvan,
On 02/Jun/07 at 00:13 you wrote:
I reached the website, but couldn't download the file. Internet
Explorer timedout for some reason.
Hrmmm.
Maybe I should try reproducing your error by importing via MFM but
I'm too lazy.
Laugh know that feeling well. Are you able to import
file_id.diz from MFM? I can't find the button to do
that one. :)
Btw do you have Arrowbridge I working ?
No, I have Arrowbridge II working though... Might be
the same trick, I had to use a dorinfox.def instead of
door.sys or else nothing is displayed to the remote user.
Just need to change your dorinfo.mec file to create
the dorinfox.def's as well since AB2 refuses to accept
dorinfo1.def from node2.
I reached the website, but couldn't download the file. Internet
Explorer timedout for some reason.
Hrmmm.
file_id.diz from MFM? I can't find the button to do
that one. :)
Did MFM ever import file_id.diz's ? ... I forgot ...
compliant door.sys or the AB source code for retrieving node number
from a standard door.sys dropfile is wrong.
Probably because it's looking for dorinfo2.def for node 2 etc.
Atleast that's how AB-I works ie. dorinfo<node>.def. I'm assuming
AB-II works similarly.
copy %max%\dorinfo1.def .\dorinfo%1.def
Apparently people adopted the numeral in dorinfo#.def to be a node designator when it was never meant to be. It's probably a "dorinfo" dropfile specification version number.
file_id.diz from MFM? I can't find the button to do
that one. :)
Did MFM ever import file_id.diz's ? ... I forgot ...
Okay then I'm not out to lunch. :) I just mis-read
what you said. I've almost got an updated MFM with
file_id.diz importing working, just being held up by
time removing the fossil / door code to MFM which is
causing a giant headache in the OS/2, Win32 port.
Besides does anyone run it as a door anymore?
compliant door.sys or the AB source code for retrieving node number
from a standard door.sys dropfile is wrong.
I'm going to blame the Ab source code because I have
around 30 other doors using door.sys without a problem.
:)
Probably because it's looking for dorinfo2.def for node 2 etc.
Atleast that's how AB-I works ie. dorinfo<node>.def. I'm assuming
AB-II works similarly.
Exactly.
copy %max%\dorinfo1.def .\dorinfo%1.def
I never thought of doing it that way, I changed the
dorinfo.mec file with a bunch of [if task] lines. :)
Apparently people adopted the numeral in dorinfo#.def to be a node designator when it was never meant to be. It's probably a "dorinfo" dropfile specification version number.
I wonder if that's what happened? Makes sense.
Okay then I'm not out to lunch. :) I just mis-read
what you said. I've almost got an updated MFM with
file_id.diz importing working, just being held up by
time removing the fossil / door code to MFM which is
causing a giant headache in the OS/2, Win32 port.
Exactly.
Man I just use the Hurl menu option.
Besides does anyone run it as a door anymore?
Not me. I'll set it up one day for kicks, just to remember what it
does. I never really used it.
dorinfo.mec file with a bunch of [if task] lines. :)
Me too, but for a different reason:
[lightred]Arrowbridge will only run on nodes 1 - 9 ! [dim](You are
on node [node_num]) [exit]
I dunno. I just adapt to whatever works. I stopped questioning it a
long time ago :)
MvanL> Man I just use the Hurl menu option.
what has that to do with removing fossil and door
library code from the package in question? hurl is used
to move a file from one location to another along with
its description... that has nothing to do with the
original question and discussion about MFM importing file_id.diz files...
MLvan>> copy %max%\dorinfo1.def .\dorinfo%1.def
that is exactly how one does it with a system that
doesn't create dorinfo2-9 files... now, what does one
do when they are running 10 or more nodes? the
dorinfox.def standard wasn't thought thru very well...
i've seen implementation that use hex and as such can
support up to 16 nodes... i've also seen
implementations that support base36 which is also
limiting on a large multinode system... then, there're
those that start dropping letters to make room for numbers...
ie: dorinfo1.def
dorinf22.def
dorin134.def
like i say, not very well thought out... but it is way
way way too late to do anything about it now, too... i
tried some 15 years back but all anyone wanted to do
then was spout the existing standard and do nothing
about fixing or enhancing it...
[trim]
MvanL>> Apparently people adopted the numeral in dorinfo#.def to
MvanL>> be a node designator when it was never meant to be. It's
MLvan>> probably a "dorinfo" dropfile specification version number.
hunh? you can provide documentation to this? i'd like
to read it because nothing like it was ever presented
or found in all my research years ago... everything i
found showed that the number _was_ the node number...
some bbs systems got around the 9 node limitation by
creating dorinfo1.def for all nodes, though... and
that's no real problem if the door can look in a
directory other than its own for the drop file...
ie: somedoor c:\bbs\n1
where c:\bbs\n1 is where the dropfile, whatever is
being used, is located... c:\bbs\n42 for node 42... no
copying or overwritting and no possibility of things
going wonky if two users enter the door at the same time...
Man I just use the Hurl menu option.
Laugh, which is what I'm using it for too! ;) I just
figured if the source is there and I have time, I might
as well try to update it enough to maybe offer people
something that does everything.
MvanL> Man I just use the Hurl menu option.
what has that to do with removing fossil and door
library code from the package in question? hurl is used
to move a file from one location to another along with
its description... that has nothing to do with the
original question and discussion about MFM importing
file_id.diz files...
dorinfox.def standard wasn't thought thru very well...
i've seen implementation that use hex and as such can
support up to 16 nodes... i've also seen
implementations that support base36 which is also
limiting on a large multinode system... then, there're
those that start dropping letters to make room for numbers...
ie: dorinfo1.def
dorinf22.def
dorin134.def
like i say, not very well thought out... but it is way
way way too late to do anything about it now, too... i
tried some 15 years back but all anyone wanted to do
then was spout the existing standard and do nothing
about fixing or enhancing it...
some bbs systems got around the 9 node limitation by
creating dorinfo1.def for all nodes, though... and
that's no real problem if the door can look in a
directory other than its own for the drop file...
ie: somedoor c:\bbs\n1
where c:\bbs\n1 is where the dropfile, whatever is
being used, is located... c:\bbs\n42 for node 42... no
copying or overwritting and no possibility of things
going wonky if two users enter the door at the same time...
figured if the source is there and I have time, I might
something that does everything.
Is it C/C++ ?
style interfaces... i don't see any of the goo old BBS doors available
in any new formats, though...
figured if the source is there and I have time, I might
something that does everything.
Is it C/C++ ?
No pascal. If it was C/C++ I wouldn't have a clue, looks
like an alien language to me.
If your a C programmer any chance I could get you to
download the Jamnntpd with SMAPI support and compile me an
os/2 version of that bad boy?
MvanL> Hurl has everything to do with not removing fossil, library code and MvanL> importing file_id.diz's with the package in the original question MvanL> and discussion.
i fail to see how... one is programming... the other is naught but file area
maint... hurl is for moving (hurling) files from one file area to
another... > unless the term "hurl" has been bastardized like so many others :(
MvanL> People assuming that "x" is a node designator would be uncomfortable
MvanL> with their understanding of dorinfo1.def.
why? dorinfox.def doesn't carry the node number internally...
ie: dorinfo1.def dorinf22.def dorin134.def
MvanL> Which is all pointless unless the door is programmed to read the mos
MvanL> recent created *.def file or accept a node number as a command
MvanL> line option.
haha... good thing you're not a real programmer, then O:)
what's wrong with passing the dropfile name on the command line and letting door parse that filename to determine the node number? believe it or not, it works for many doors out there ;)
MvanL> A "/node=65535" sounds pretty limitless to me.
furrfu, damn good thing you're not a real programmer ;) it is arbitrary
limi > like that that have caused all kinds of problems over the years...
for instance... 1. some popular offline mail readers have a 200
=line= limit...
2. some FTN mail tossers can't process FTN messages larger than
16K... fewer can handle 32K... what's the problem? the specs state
that the message body of a packed message is unbounded...
that means that you read until you hit the next null character
not just read 16K... that's laziness, amoung other things ;)
MvanL> ... assuming it needed fixing or enhancing. That's what alternate
MvanL> dropfiles were for eg. door.sys.
sorry... not... alternate dropfiles were created because info not available dorinfox.def was needed... besides, door.sys evidently has problems, too...
it didn't door32.sys wouldn't have been created, eh? :)
MvanL> My argument would be people started writing and using TCP/IP and
MvanL> multithreaded daemons and computer clusters and invented the
MvanL> I-n-t-e-r-n-e-t.
haha... that's not an argument... that's a diversion so that one can exit th building and not have to face the discussion at hand ;)
MvanL> And that's why those large multinode BBS's are extinct and any
MvanL> node/dropfile conflict issues are nowadays virtually impossible.
i disagree... most of them have simply changed faces... many BBS systems are now ISPs... a lot of BBS systems have also moved to forum style interfaces.. don't see any of the goo old BBS doors available in any new formats, though.
figured if the source is there and I have time, I might something
that does everything. Is it C/C++ ?
No pascal. If it was C/C++ I wouldn't have a clue, looks like an alien language to me.
If your a C programmer any chance I could get you to download
the Jamnntpd with SMAPI support and compile me an os/2 version
of that bad boy?
if it is nothing more than a compile, i might be able to do that... well, if you're on OS/2 and have the EMX runtime, that is ;)
if it is nothing more than a compile, i might be able to do that...
well, if you're on OS/2 and have the EMX runtime, that is ;)
No pascal. If it was C/C++ I wouldn't have a clue, looks like an alien language to me.
Bleh. Not for me then :)
You could also try the Open Watcom compiler, which cross compiles OS/2 binaries.
MvanL> Hurl has everything to do with not removing fossil,
MvanL> library code and importing file_id.diz's with the
MvanL> package in the original question and discussion.
i fail to see how... one is programming... the other is
naught but file area [...]
That's due to your myopic interpretation of the discussion you
replied to.
maint... hurl is for moving (hurling) files from one file area to
And is a file / filearea maintenance tool.
another... > unless the term "hurl" has been bastardized like
so many others :(
Who cares.
English words are subject to democratic acceptance and
semantic evolution.
MvanL> People assuming that "x" is a node designator
MvanL> would be uncomfortable with their understanding
MvanL> of dorinfo1.def.
why? dorinfox.def doesn't carry the node number internally...
And that's why you're confused and unhappy.
ie: dorinfo1.def dorinf22.def dorin134.def
MvanL> Which is all pointless unless the door is
MvanL> programmed to read the most recent created *.def
MvanL> file or accept a node number as a command line
MvanL> option.
haha... good thing you're not a real programmer, then O:)
RA should drop support for exitinfo and strictly adhere to
door.sys standards then, because their programmers couldn't
fathom the limiting issues with their chosen implementation.
what's wrong with passing the dropfile name on the command
line and letting door parse that filename to determine the
node number? believe it or not, it works for many doors out
there ;)
What's wrong with passing the node number as an option to
the door ? hence rendering node number dropfile naming
conventions irrelevant. Believe it or not it works for
many doors out there.
MvanL> A "/node=65535" sounds pretty limitless to me.
furrfu, damn good thing you're not a real programmer ;) it
is arbitrary limit like that that have caused all kinds of
problems over the years...
It's not an arbitrary limit. It's an example command line
option.
for instance... 1. some popular offline mail readers have a 200
=line= limit...
2. some FTN mail tossers can't process FTN messages larger than
16K... fewer can handle 32K... what's the problem? the specs state
that the message body of a packed message is unbounded...
that means that you read until you hit the next null character
not just read 16K... that's laziness, amoung other things ;)
Which are all issues for the relevant applications and users
of those applications, and are non existent problems for me.
Firstly, I definitely would seriously reconsider using any
mail readers limited to a crappy 200 line message.
Secondly because Squish can be configured to split large
packet sizes I have no problem sending or receiving messages
for any practical purpose.
You could also try the Open Watcom compiler, which
cross compiles OS/2
binaries.
I actually installed Open Watcom to try this, but I
think the makefile / code is desgined for GCC, it just
failed horibily, but again I don't know what I'm doing.
:)
My apologies if I'm taking comments out of context. I am trying to
catch up on a backlog of echomail messages.
Hello Hostile,
On 10/Jun/07 at 03:33 you wrote:
No pascal. If it was C/C++ I wouldn't have a clue, looks like an alien language to me.
Bleh. Not for me then :)
Laugh your one of those alien's eh? ;) My neighbour
is a teacher at a local community college and has all
these textbooks on learning to program C++. He keeps
offering them to me, but it just doesn't look anything
like that I expect it to. (Can you tell I'm just stubern?)
i fail to see how... one is programming... the other is
naught but file area [...]
That's due to your myopic interpretation of the discussion you
replied to.
wrong... that is due to the fact that i can seperate
intertwined subjects from each other and take each at
its face value ;)
so, why'd you change your name to "hostile"? is it more fitting??
maint... hurl is for moving (hurling) files from one file area to
And is a file / filearea maintenance tool.
is that not what i said? a tool to hurl files from here to there??
another... > unless the term "hurl" has been bastardized like
so many others :(
Who cares.
a lot of folk, obviously... but we already knwo that
doesn't include you per your own writtings of
selfishness based on your childhood :(
English words are subject to democratic acceptance and
semantic evolution.
that's copout attitude...
MvanL> People assuming that "x" is a node designator
MvanL> would be uncomfortable with their understanding
MvanL> of dorinfo1.def.
why? dorinfox.def doesn't carry the node number internally...
And that's why you're confused and unhappy.
yeah? what gives you that majorly erroneous idea?
there's no imperical evidence pointing to it, is there??
you obviously don't have a clue what information is
contained within the exitinfo.bbs file, then... for one
thing, tell me if door.sys can carry the info on what
message areas a user has selected to join... never
mind, as you can't tell me that... truth be known,
exitinfo.bbs carries all bbs config information as it
relates to the currently logged on user...
What's wrong with passing the node number as an option to
the door ? hence rendering node number dropfile naming
conventions irrelevant. Believe it or not it works for
many doors out there.
duh? i think i've been doing this a few more years than
you have, Mvan... at least as long as you are years
old, thankyouverymuch...
MvanL> A "/node=65535" sounds pretty limitless to me.
furrfu, damn good thing you're not a real programmer ;) it
is arbitrary limit like that that have caused all kinds of
problems over the years...
It's not an arbitrary limit. It's an example command line
option.
it doesn't read that way... apologies if i misread your
mind as you didn't say that in that manner...
for instance... 1. some popular offline mail readers have a 200
=line= limit...
2. some FTN mail tossers can't process FTN messages larger than
16K... fewer can handle 32K... what's the problem? the specs state
that the message body of a packed message is unbounded...
that means that you read until you hit the next null character
not just read 16K... that's laziness, amoung other things ;)
Which are all issues for the relevant applications and users
of those applications, and are non existent problems for me.
we're not talking about just you... there are others in
the world doing this stuff ;)
Firstly, I definitely would seriously reconsider using any
mail readers limited to a crappy 200 line message.
then i guess you don't use bluewave or any other
similar offline mail readers...
Secondly because Squish can be configured to split large
packet sizes I have no problem sending or receiving messages
for any practical purpose.
that's all well and good... too bad the split proposal
that squish and others follow is directed at the wrong
side of the "too large a message" problem :
MvanL> the aliens :)No pascal. If it was C/C++ I wouldn't have a clue, looks
like an alien language to me.
Bleh. Not for me then :)
Laugh your one of those alien's eh? ;) My neighbour
If your home planet is Earth then Pascal programmers are
i fail to see how... one is programming... the other is
naught but file area [...]
That's due to your myopic interpretation of the discussion you
replied to.
wrong... that is due to the fact that i can seperate
intertwined subjects from each other and take each at
its face value ;)
so, why'd you change your name to "hostile"? is it more fitting??
another... unless the term "hurl" has been bastardized like
so many others :(
Who cares.
a lot of folk, obviously... but we already knwo that
doesn't include you per your own writtings of
selfishness based on your childhood :(
MvanL> People assuming that "x" is a node designator
MvanL> would be uncomfortable with their understanding
MvanL> of dorinfo1.def.
why? dorinfox.def doesn't carry the node number internally...
And that's why you're confused and unhappy.
yeah? what gives you that majorly erroneous idea?
there's no imperical evidence pointing to it, is there??
you obviously don't have a clue what information is
contained within the exitinfo.bbs file, then... for one
thing, tell me if door.sys can carry the info on what
message areas a user has selected to join... never
mind, as you can't tell me that... truth be known,
exitinfo.bbs carries all bbs config information as it
relates to the currently logged on user...
What's wrong with passing the node number as an option to
the door ? hence rendering node number dropfile naming
conventions irrelevant. Believe it or not it works for
many doors out there.
duh? i think i've been doing this a few more years than
you have, Mvan... at least as long as you are years
old, thankyouverymuch...
MvanL> A "/node=65535" sounds pretty limitless to me.
furrfu, damn good thing you're not a real programmer ;) it
is arbitrary limit like that that have caused all kinds of
problems over the years...
It's not an arbitrary limit. It's an example command line
option.
it doesn't read that way... apologies if i misread your
mind as you didn't say that in that manner...
so, why'd you change your name to "hostile"? is it more fitting??
MvanL> That's the nick on Vertrauen.
great... i'll get a netmail off to that sysop and ask him to correct his configuration... i'm not aware of any echos in today's fidonet that allow handled or nicknames...
so, why'd you change your name to "hostile"? is
it more fitting??
MvanL> That's the nick on Vertrauen.
great... i'll get a netmail off to that sysop and ask him
to correct his configuration... i'm not aware of any echos
in today's fidonet that allow handled or nicknames...
No need, it's already fixed.
ROTFLMAO!! i guess C coders would think that even if
the fact that PASCAL was invented first, by a year,
eludes them ;)
MvanL> People don't use Pascal for any serious programming, and
MvanL> before a debate about that happens I will ask how many
MvanL> kernels, Operating Systems, low level device drivers and
MvanL> embedded devices are written in Pascal compared to C/C++ :)
i guess you don't feel that systems with BASIC as their
OS are real systems, either? ;) i'm aware of more than
one mini, still in use today, that has BASIC as its
core operating system and everything that runs on it is
written in BASIC, as well ;)
MvanL> Selfishness is good.
ya reap what ya sow... there's more than one selfish person that i've left standing by themselves because of their
selfishness... what goes around comes around and strikes three times as hard... i've helped selfish folk and then had them
refuse to help me later... that put them in a
predicament when they desperately needed some help and
asked me for mine... one individual spent several
months in jail waiting on his court date because i
didn't loan him the $500US bond that would have allowed
him to be free until that court date... that jail time
lead to the loss of his job which also lead to the loss
of his home and vehicle... go ahead... be selfish ;)
MvanL> satisfied the requirement of whomever invented it.
i never said that dorinfox.def should carry more
details... i said that it doesn't carry the node number
internally... you extrapolated that on to something else...
MvanL> If people deviate from the specification and adopt different
MvanL> methods for using dorinfo1.def that's their perogative, which
MvanL> doesn't change the fact that the number in the dorinfo1.def
MvanL> dropfile was never meant to designate a node number.
you've still not provided the proof of this... i'm more
than willing to look at it once it is made available...
i would hope that it is written by the original author
of the dorinfox.def specification ;)
ROTFLMAO!! i guess C coders would think that even if
the fact that PASCAL was invented first, by a year,
eludes them ;)
MvanL> Selfishness is good.
ya reap what ya sow... there's more than one selfish person
that i've left standing by themselves because of their
selfishness... what goes around comes around and strikes
three times as hard... i've helped selfish folk and then
had them refuse to help me later... that put them in a
predicament when they desperately needed some help and
asked me for mine... one individual spent several
months in jail waiting on his court date because i
didn't loan him the $500US bond that would have allowed
him to be free until that court date... that jail time
lead to the loss of his job which also lead to the loss
of his home and vehicle... go ahead... be selfish ;)
MvanL> satisfied the requirement of whomever invented it.
i never said that dorinfox.def should carry more
details... i said that it doesn't carry the node number
internally... you extrapolated that on to something else...
MvanL> If people deviate from the specification and adopt different
MvanL> methods for using dorinfo1.def that's their perogative, which
MvanL> doesn't change the fact that the number in the dorinfo1.def
MvanL> dropfile was never meant to designate a node number.
you've still not provided the proof of this... i'm more
than willing to look at it once it is made available...
i would hope that it is written by the original author
of the dorinfox.def specification ;)
in this instance, your mistake is in believing unproven and
undocumented writtings that you read on wikipedia ;)
If your home planet is Earth then Pascal programmers are the aliens :)
Yep. Stubborn are people who vehemently (and annoyingly) advocate DOS and/or OS2 and Pascal. I can tell they're trapped in a time warp and
are invariably in their mid 40s. Time is running out for them. MUAhaha <evil laugh>.
MvanL> What goes around comes around.
yup... your's is coming, too ;)
ROTFLMAO!! i guess C coders would think that even if
the fact that PASCAL was invented first, by a year,
eludes them ;)
MvanL> That makes Pascal even MORE outdated.
as is C ;)
MvanL> dropfile and "those" dorinfo(x|#).def dropfiles ?
do you understand the meaning of "POST THE SPECS OR A LINK TO THEM"?
you've still not provided the proof of this... i'm more
than willing to look at it once it is made available...
i would hope that it is written by the original author
of the dorinfox.def specification ;)
MvanL> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropfile:
oh, cool... i'll go fix that right now...
hint: don't take wikipedia as gospel...
MvanL> Which is totally conclusive evidence that the RA mob initiated a
MvanL> dorinfo(x|#).def propaganda against dorinfo1.def which the BBS
MvanL> community later acquiesced towards.
no, it is not conclusive of that... QBBS was also using
dorinfox.def at that time as were wildcat, pcboard, and
many other mainstream bbs packages... besides, there's
no cite for that information or a link to the specs
those statements are drawn from...
MvanL> You therefore are a victim of misinformation.
in this instance, your mistake is in believing unproven
and undocumented writtings that you read on wikipedia
If you take what you read on Wikipedia as gospel,
you're an idiot, IMNSHO. That place is the world's
biggest hangout for s*ithouse lawyers, if you know what
I mean.
Yep. Stubborn are people who vehemently (and
annoyingly) advocate DOS
and/or OS2 and Pascal. I can tell they're trapped in a time warp and
are invariably in their mid 40s. Time is running
out for them. MUAhaha
<evil laugh>.
I wouldn't say I vehemently advocate dos and/or os/2.
I wouldn't say I vehemently advocate dos and/or os/2.
I never said nor implied that you did :)
in this instance, your mistake is in believing unproven and
undocumented writtings that you read on wikipedia ;)
If you take what you read on Wikipedia as gospel, you're an idiot,
IMNSHO. That place is the world's biggest hangout for s*ithouse
lawyers, if you know what I mean.
MvanL> What goes around comes around.
yup... your's is coming, too ;)
ROTFLMAO!! i guess C coders would think that even if
the fact that PASCAL was invented first, by a year,
eludes them ;)
MvanL> That makes Pascal even MORE outdated.
as is C ;)
MvanL> dropfile and "those" dorinfo(x|#).def dropfiles ?
do you understand the meaning of "POST THE SPECS OR A LINK
TO THEM"?
you've still not provided the proof of this... i'm more
than willing to look at it once it is made available...
i would hope that it is written by the original author
of the dorinfox.def specification ;)
MvanL> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropfile:
oh, cool... i'll go fix that right now...
hint: don't take wikipedia as gospel...
I have obliged your request for documentation.
MvanL> You therefore are a victim of misinformation.
in this instance, your mistake is in believing unproven
and undocumented writtings that you read on wikipedia
yup... your's is coming, too ;)
MvanL> That's what you think.
that's what i know... without a doubt... life works
that way and you are not immune to it no matter how
much miney you have, how greedy you are, or even how
angry you get... it _will_ happen...
MvanL> That makes Pascal even MORE outdated.
as is C ;)
MvanL> Err no, C is continually in use for serious
MvanL> programming and will outlast Pascal.
err, yes... C is as outdated as Pascal... by your
definition, anyway... so make up your mind, eh?
MvanL> Maximus creates "dorinfo1".def for ALL NODES, and always has.
ok [shrug]
i can, at least, program in whatever language i choose
to for the job at hand... even if it is Pascal, which
you just toss off as being out of date due to its age
with total disregard for the fact that your chosen
language is just as old and out of tune with today's
reality...
My stance on the dorinfo1.def subject is that I've
always just gone with whatever the door required. Most
My stance on the dorinfo1.def subject is that I've
always just gone with whatever the door required.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,038 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 45:14:28 |
Calls: | 500,199 |
Files: | 95,197 |
D/L today: |
264 files (31,156K bytes) |
Messages: | 465,916 |