[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:53:11 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
$The Doctor wrote:
Are you familiar with argument by contradiction?$
$Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
$
$So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting it? And
$what does that have to do with nullspacing?
While it's maybe not the sketch you were thinking of, "The Life of
Brian" comes to mind. :)
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
The Doctor wrote:be
In article <v61pc8h7ke7ifd75lgeubfshao8bnm4kaj@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:46:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote:
$"Stephen Wilson" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Brian" <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote in message$
news:2119041223377190717.496560bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com...
How would you describe a Dinosaur to other people. Names such as T-Rex etc
were not known in that time period.
It's interesting that there is no other record of Dinosaurs existing yet
there bones have been found.
Why's that interesting? What kind of records do you expect to be of them
apart from their bones?
$I have not done much research on dinosaurs so I am assuming that they were
$around when men were on the earth. If that is the case then their should
$some drawing in a cave to have some sort of record that they existed.
You might want to do some reading up on dinosaurs then.
--
REcall Behemoth in Job 40
--
The Behemoth was a made-up, fictional monster, just like the rest of
Job was a made-up, fictional story.
Now, the Behemoth might have been inspired by a dinosaur skeleton
fossil. Lots of fictional monsters were. For example, the Cyclops
was inspired by a Triceratops fossil. (They mistook the empty horn
socket for an eye socket.) And Griffins were based on Protoceratops >skeletons.
Do you have _any_ actual evidence that the Behemoth was based on eye-
witness accounts of a real, live dinosaur? If so, post it. If not,
stop going on about it.
In article <bee0991f-27a8-4017-9701-0c44cad3e47a@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Then expalin Leviathan in Job 41
The Doctor wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<bee0991f-27a8-4017-9701-0c44cad3e47a@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Then expalin Leviathan in Job 41
The Doctor wrote:
Sure with this poster would be contacted by his ISP for his flagrant >violations of the TOS, specifically regarding excessive cross-posting.
In a just world his account would be cancelled.
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
$Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting it?
And what does that have to do with nullspacing?
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use any.
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or intelligble
$answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to a deskDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
it? $>>> And what does that have to do with nullspacing?Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting
$
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use any.
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or
intelligble $answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the
argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to a deskDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
it? $>>> And what does that have to do with nullspacing?Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting
$
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use any.
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or
intelligble $answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the
argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
--
PV
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to aDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
it? $>>> And what does that have to do with nullspacing?Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting
any. $
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or
intelligble $answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the
argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to aDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
any. $Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting >>>>>> it? $>>> And what does that have to do with nullspacing?
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or
intelligble $answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the
argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell is >"sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless the "case" >you are resting is your case of mental instability
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:49:45 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,$
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to aDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:$
In article
it? $>>> And what does that have to do with nullspacing?Yes. Monty Python made a famous sketch about it.
So what are you contradicting? And how are you contradicting
any. $
What about mathematics?
--
What about it?
You keep mentioning mathematics, but you never actually use
$You are aware that the Doc will never ever give straight or
intelligble $answer when he knows damn well he cannot win the
argument?
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
$Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell is
$"sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
$
$Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless the "case"
$you are resting is your case of mental instability
For a guy with a university education, the doctor really is badly
educated.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
In article <KU8zs.7009$qb3.1083@newsfe25.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to aDepends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell
is "sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless
the "case" you are resting is your case of mental instability
PV you are inane and insane.
In article <bee0991f-27a8-4017-9701-0c44cad3e47a@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
T-Rex etcThe Doctor wrote:
In article <v61pc8h7ke7ifd75lgeubfshao8bnm4kaj@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:46:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote:
$"Stephen Wilson" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Brian" <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote in message
news:2119041223377190717.496560bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com... >> >> $>>
How would you describe a Dinosaur to other people. Names such as
existing yetwere not known in that time period.
It's interesting that there is no other record of Dinosaurs
themthere bones have been found.
Why's that interesting? What kind of records do you expect to be of
wereapart from their bones?$
$I have not done much research on dinosaurs so I am assuming that they
should be$around when men were on the earth. If that is the case then their
$some drawing in a cave to have some sort of record that they existed. >> >You might want to do some reading up on dinosaurs then.
--
REcall Behemoth in Job 40
--
The Behemoth was a made-up, fictional monster, just like the rest of
Job was a made-up, fictional story.
Now, the Behemoth might have been inspired by a dinosaur skeleton
fossil. Lots of fictional monsters were. For example, the Cyclops
was inspired by a Triceratops fossil. (They mistook the empty horn
socket for an eye socket.) And Griffins were based on Protoceratops >skeletons.
Do you have _any_ actual evidence that the Behemoth was based on eye- >witness accounts of a real, live dinosaur? If so, post it. If not,
stop going on about it.
Then expalin Leviathan in Job 41
--
The Doctor wrote:
In article <KU8zs.7009$qb3.1083@newsfe25.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to a >>>>>>> desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> $solar penguin wrote:Depends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
The Doctor wrote:
In article
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell
is "sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless
the "case" you are resting is your case of mental instability
PV you are inane and insane.
And you are an illiterate attention seeker whose only social life is posting >gibberish nonsense in a desparate attempt to be the #1 poster in a dying >medium called Usenet
What's your point?
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" is supposed >to mean
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
The Doctor wrote:them
In article <bee0991f-27a8-4017-9701-0c44cad3e47a@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <v61pc8h7ke7ifd75lgeubfshao8bnm4kaj@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:46:43 GMT, while chained to a desk in >> >> >the scriptorium Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote:
$"Stephen Wilson" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Brian" <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote in message
news:2119041223377190717.496560bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com... >> >> >> $>>
How would you describe a Dinosaur to other people. Names such as T-Rex etc
were not known in that time period.
It's interesting that there is no other record of Dinosaurs existing yet
there bones have been found.
Why's that interesting? What kind of records do you expect to be of
wereapart from their bones?$
$I have not done much research on dinosaurs so I am assuming that they
$around when men were on the earth. If that is the case then their should beYou might want to do some reading up on dinosaurs then.
$some drawing in a cave to have some sort of record that they existed. >> >> >
--
REcall Behemoth in Job 40
--
The Behemoth was a made-up, fictional monster, just like the rest of
Job was a made-up, fictional story.
Now, the Behemoth might have been inspired by a dinosaur skeleton
fossil. Lots of fictional monsters were. For example, the Cyclops
was inspired by a Triceratops fossil. (They mistook the empty horn
socket for an eye socket.) And Griffins were based on Protoceratops
skeletons.
Do you have _any_ actual evidence that the Behemoth was based on eye-
witness accounts of a real, live dinosaur? If so, post it. If not,
stop going on about it.
Then expalin Leviathan in Job 41
--
It's another imaginary, fictional monster from that imaginary,
fictional story.
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <KU8zs.7009$qb3.1083@newsfe25.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to >>>>>>>> a desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>Depends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell
is "sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless
the "case" you are resting is your case of mental instability
PV you are inane and insane.
And you are an illiterate attention seeker whose only social life is
posting gibberish nonsense in a desparate attempt to be the #1
poster in a dying medium called Usenet
What's your point?
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" is
supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <KU8zs.7009$qb3.1083@newsfe25.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sq8zs.20564$sm1.17600@newsfe22.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <sh3qc853vbeamj4616res755uttodkcuf7@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:29 -0700, while chained to >>>>>>>>> a desk in the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net>Depends on what sceintific gobelldygook you 2 can produce.
wrote:
$solar penguin wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
That's the best explanation for his behaviour I've seen.
What?
I rest my case mi'lord.
Sorry I am still trying to decipher your post above. What the hell
is "sceintific gobelldygook" supposed to mean?
Other then yet another exhibition of your near illiteracy, unless
the "case" you are resting is your case of mental instability
PV you are inane and insane.
And you are an illiterate attention seeker whose only social life is
posting gibberish nonsense in a desparate attempt to be the #1
poster in a dying medium called Usenet
What's your point?
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" is
supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
The Doctor wrote:
In article <2dbaa746-1eb0-4cf2-bb16-b18e42cf3e46@b11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <e59ee7bf-f787-4304-99df-c5b4da278b83@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <bd7a2eb9-e6b1-43ce-89c4-d1bfee3765ac@b16g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <eed4fad4-c432-4d51-b130-699f4a5d1c5a@m13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Or they were flooded out.
Brian wrote:
It's interesting that there is no other record of Dinosaurs existing yet
there bones have been found.
That's because they died millions of years before people evolved. >> >> >> >>
--
If you assume the flood myth is true, why didn't Utnapishtim (or Noah >> >> >> >or whatever you want to call him) save any dinosaurs on board his Ark?
I notice you didn't answer this.
And what does any of this have to do with whether dinosaurs were
created or evolved? Remember, the flood wouldn't have happened until >> >> >> >after then.
What about demons and women mating?
--
Is that why you can't get a date? Women prefer demons to you, do
they? Can't say I blame them.
But what does that have to do with the evolution of dinosaurs?
Many homo artificialis has something to with it
--
No, people who want to be cyborgs have nothing to do with it.
Homo artificialis is the cross products of demon spawn and human women
that tried to exterminate homo sapiens.
--
No it's not. It's people who want to become cyborgs. I've told you
this before.
Can you name _anyone_ apart from you that uses it to mean demons that
are half-human on their mother's side?
Can you point to any fossil evidence that these half-human demons
existed?
And what does any of this have to do with proving whether or not
dinosaurs evolved?
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" is
supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" is
supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are you a direct >descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook"
is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are you
a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific gobelldygook" >>>>>>> is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are you
a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are you
a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are you
a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize to all >functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are
you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize
to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are
you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize
to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to deserve >this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
ôYouth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.ö
- Aristophanes
The Doctor wrote:desk
In article <289sc8h1emhicfj9sor756d6fes8uji3v3@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:45:58 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
$The Doctor wrote:
In article <c61288b8-8aa7-4225-8903-0e2bacb26d96@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1896285434377311926.708428bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com>,
Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <dvv2c81osll4h32eqbpt352kij934vu006@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:54:05 -0000, while chained to a
apes in thein the scriptorium "Stephen Wilson"
<stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
$"Brian" <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote in message
$news:1193592277376480872.596831bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com...
They say that Man evolved from Apes but I don't see any half and and
half
man in the world.
There were some, but it was millions of years ago. If you want to see
some
now, just watch WWE* "wrestling". ;-)
* Or whatever they've yet again changed it to.
But if all the apes changed into men then there would be no
lastworld.$
$You still haven't really grasped the concept.
$
$Apes didn't change into men. Apes and men are more like cousins. We share a
$common ancestor.
For our closest cousins, the chimpanzees, evidence suggests the
group evolvecommon ancestor existed about 5 million to 7 million years
ago.Allowing about 20 years between generations, that is 250,000 to
350,000 generations ago.
Our common ancestor with bonobos is probably just as far back, and our
common ancestor with gorillas is further back still.
$Even then, evolution does not propose that all members of one
apes$into another. If a mutation provides a good outcome, that gene is propagated
$to the next generation. So a small group carries the mutation, but the rest
$of the group does not. Evolution is an on-going process of trial and error.
$Apes remain a part of it, as do we and all other life on earth.
Primate and human might be comparable but it is doubtful
that humans evolved from apes.
I agree that we don't come from apes. Someone thinks to himself as
$look similar to humans then maybe we evolved from apes. Apes are apes and
humans are humans just as fish and birds are different.
--
The most absurd argument for evolution: birds are now the remnant of
dinosaurs.
--
Why is that absurd? Give just one good reason why birds couldn't be >> >> $> >the descendants of dinosaurs. (Hint: your explanation should take
Archaeopteryx into account.)
crows descended from dinosaurs? Robins? Magpies?
--
$Yes, that's right.
$
$Have you got _any_ evidence that they didn't?
Of course he doesn't.
The closest he probably gets was a trip to the Royal Alberta Museum,
where they have a T. Rex and a Stegasaurus on display.
Of course, those are at the larger end of the dinosaur spectrum of
sizes, and it doesn't cross his mind there are some really small
dinosaurs as well.
Oh, and while he is trying to explain Archaeopteryx, he'll also have
to explain the quill knobs on a velociraptor skeleton found in
Mongolia.
--
How about a Pterodatyl turning into a bird?
A T.Rex into a bird? LOL!!
--
No, of course not a T. Rex into a bird. That would be silly. The T.
Rex didn't evolve until near the end of the dinosaurs' era, after the
first birds had _already_ evolved.
Maybe you really _do_ think time goes backwards...?
[Default] On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:54:02 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
$The Doctor wrote:
In article <289sc8h1emhicfj9sor756d6fes8uji3v3@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:45:58 -0800 (PST), while chained to a >> $> >desk in the scriptorium solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: >> $> >> $The Doctor wrote:
In article <c61288b8-8aa7-4225-8903-0e2bacb26d96@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
$crows descended from dinosaurs? Robins? Magpies?$
--
$Yes, that's right.
$
$Have you got _any_ evidence that they didn't?
Of course he doesn't.
The closest he probably gets was a trip to the Royal Alberta Museum,
where they have a T. Rex and a Stegasaurus on display.
Of course, those are at the larger end of the dinosaur spectrum of
sizes, and it doesn't cross his mind there are some really small
dinosaurs as well.
Oh, and while he is trying to explain Archaeopteryx, he'll also have
to explain the quill knobs on a velociraptor skeleton found in
Mongolia.
How about a Pterodatyl turning into a bird?
A T.Rex into a bird? LOL!!
$No, of course not a T. Rex into a bird. That would be silly. The T.
$Rex didn't evolve until near the end of the dinosaurs' era, after the
$first birds had _already_ evolved.
$
$Maybe you really _do_ think time goes backwards...?
Plus he jupmps onto a single example, quietly ignoring the fact
dinosaurs were a highly diverse group of animals--probably just as
diverse as modern mammals. (BTW, doctor, pterodactyls are not
dinosaurs, dinosaurs being limitied to saurischia and ornithischia,
whereas pterodactyls belong to the pterosaurs.)
And let's face it, modern mammals are a pretty diverse lot. Everything
from whales to hippopotami to mice to humans to wombats.
Pointing at T. Rex and saying there is no link between dinosaurs and
birds is like pointing at a polar bear and saying there is no way
mammals could evolve flight--ignoring the fact that an estimated one
fifth of mammal species are bats.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>>
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>> 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize
to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year 2013
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>>>
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>> 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize >>>>> to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for logic >in your posts.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year >> 2013
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific
gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad
spellers? Are you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and
apologize to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have
caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to
deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and
drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for
logic in your posts.
Robert Weldon wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad >>>>>>>>>> spellers? Are you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and
apologize to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have
caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to
deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and
drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for
logic in your posts.
I would be happy if he would just post in understandable english, hoping for >logic is reaching way too high in the case of the Doctor
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
The Doctor wrote:any half and and
In article <c3f4d6e9-2827-40eb-b450-c0c20205f5a4@r4g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <636160ae-b2a2-4510-952e-78e9e72f9f55@c16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <289sc8h1emhicfj9sor756d6fes8uji3v3@4ax.com>,
John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:45:58 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
desk in the scriptorium solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
$The Doctor wrote:
In article <c61288b8-8aa7-4225-8903-0e2bacb26d96@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <1896285434377311926.708428bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com>,
Brian <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <dvv2c81osll4h32eqbpt352kij934vu006@4ax.com>, >> >> >> >> $> >> >> John Fleming <nospam@sprynet.com> wrote:
[Default] On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:54:05 -0000, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "Stephen Wilson"
<stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
$"Brian" <bclark@es.co.nz> wrote in message
$news:1193592277376480872.596831bclark-es.co.nz@free.teranews.com...
They say that Man evolved from Apes but I don't see
be no apes in thehalf
man in the world.
There were some, but it was millions of years ago. If you want to see
some
now, just watch WWE* "wrestling". ;-)
* Or whatever they've yet again changed it to.
But if all the apes changed into men then there would
cousins. We share aworld.$
$You still haven't really grasped the concept.
$
$Apes didn't change into men. Apes and men are more like
of trial and error.$common ancestor.
For our closest cousins, the chimpanzees, evidence suggests the last
common ancestor existed about 5 million to 7 million years
ago.Allowing about 20 years between generations, that is 250,000 to
350,000 generations ago.
Our common ancestor with bonobos is probably just as far back, and our
common ancestor with gorillas is further back still.
$Even then, evolution does not propose that all members of one group evolve
$into another. If a mutation provides a good outcome, that gene is propagated
$to the next generation. So a small group carries the mutation, but the rest
$of the group does not. Evolution is an on-going process
are apes and$Apes remain a part of it, as do we and all other life on earth.
Primate and human might be comparable but it is doubtful >> >> >> >> $> >> >> that humans evolved from apes.
I agree that we don't come from apes. Someone thinks to himself as apes
look similar to humans then maybe we evolved from apes. Apes
$humans are humans just as fish and birds are different.
--
The most absurd argument for evolution: birds are now the remnant of
dinosaurs.
--
Why is that absurd? Give just one good reason why birds couldn't be
the descendants of dinosaurs. (Hint: your explanation should take
Archaeopteryx into account.)
crows descended from dinosaurs? Robins? Magpies?
--
$Yes, that's right.
$
$Have you got _any_ evidence that they didn't?
Of course he doesn't.
The closest he probably gets was a trip to the Royal Alberta Museum, >> >> >> >where they have a T. Rex and a Stegasaurus on display.
Of course, those are at the larger end of the dinosaur spectrum of
sizes, and it doesn't cross his mind there are some really small
dinosaurs as well.
Oh, and while he is trying to explain Archaeopteryx, he'll also have >> >> >> >to explain the quill knobs on a velociraptor skeleton found in
Mongolia.
--
How about a Pterodatyl turning into a bird?
A T.Rex into a bird? LOL!!
--
No, of course not a T. Rex into a bird. That would be silly. The T.
Rex didn't evolve until near the end of the dinosaurs' era, after the
first birds had _already_ evolved.
Maybe you really _do_ think time goes backwards...?
Forwards and the statement of dinosaurs evolving into birds
is high absurdity that Red Dwarf does a good job of it!
--
A goose job? Yes, geese evolved from dinosaurs, just like all birds.
I'm not sure what the rest of your sentence is supposed to mean.
Fixed my mistake sp.
--
I'm still not sure what that's supposed to mean. Are you saying that
just because something is mentioned in a sitcom, it can't really
exist? I guess Dad's Army means there was no World War 2 then!
In article <bVIzs.34155$2x2.33403@newsfe01.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>>>>
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>> 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize >>>>>> to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>>>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for >>logic
in your posts.
If you can understand logic RW.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New
Year
2013
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >news:kao378$4jn$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <bVIzs.34155$2x2.33403@newsfe01.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>>news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>>>>>
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual English. >>>>>>>>> 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and apologize >>>>>>> to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>>>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>>>>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for >>>logic
in your posts.
If you can understand logic RW.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist >>>> rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New >>>> Year
2013
I have shown quite clearly that I can understand logic. Understanding some >of your posts, however, requires an understanding of gibberish and fundy >lunacy that I do not have.
In article <3_lDs.21537$Id.20197@newsfe24.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>news:kao378$4jn$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <bVIzs.34155$2x2.33403@newsfe01.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>>>news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
Now for another question:P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks. >>>>>>>>>>>>
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts >>>>>>>>>>
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>> English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and
apologize
to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/ >>>>>>>>
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>>>>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>>>>>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for >>>>logic
in your posts.
If you can understand logic RW.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist >>>>> rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New >>>>> Year
2013
I have shown quite clearly that I can understand logic. Understanding >>some
of your posts, however, requires an understanding of gibberish and fundy >>lunacy that I do not have.
You and Grosvenor must share the smae room at Alberta Hospital Edmonton.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year 2013
In article <WROzs.9420$532.3366@newsfe03.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
Robert Weldon wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks.
Now for another question:
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad >>>>>>>>>>> spellers? Are you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate.
Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual
English. 2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and
apologize to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have >>>>>>> caused/
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>>> deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and
drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for
logic in your posts.
I would be happy if he would just post in understandable english, hoping >>for
logic is reaching way too high in the case of the Doctor
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
What a pair of jokers RW and PV are.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year 2013
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >news:kbl24p$4ub$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <3_lDs.21537$Id.20197@newsfe24.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>>news:kao378$4jn$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <bVIzs.34155$2x2.33403@newsfe01.iad>,
Robert Weldon <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >>>>>news:kanbs3$ca2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
In article <jXvzs.10443$fh5.8241@newsfe26.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <5Ptzs.36086$pV4.8804@newsfe21.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <FCtzs.15411$TH3.14697@newsfe12.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <aftzs.27093$eK6.25287@newsfe31.iad>,Boooooooommmmmmmmmm
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <Okmzs.10492$Ep5.4265@newsfe08.iad>,
PV <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <_s9zs.14103$gf1.8614@newsfe14.iad>,
<snip>
Now for another question:P.S. You still haven't explained what "sceintific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gobelldygook" is supposed to mean
PV is a miserable Miser.
You have once again dodged the question,
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Obvoiusly you have never heard Genesis of the Daleks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
And it still hasn't answered the original question
Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>>>> English.
Daleks, are they the lost tribe of extremely bad spellers? Are >>>>>>>>>>>>> you a direct descendant?
Or are you just another functional illiterate?
Looks like we can conclude PV is a CULTURAL illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>
Another irony meter bites the dust
You still haven't answered the questions (big surprise)
Dr Who is to culture as the Hells Angels are to Boy Scouts >>>>>>>>>>>
Three questions are outstanding here:
1) Please translate "sceintific gobelldygook" into actual >>>>>>>>>>> English.
2) What does "Obvoiusly" mean?
3) Are you just another functional illiterate?
Sorry V but your are proveing to be a throwback to 1975.
How's that again? "your are"? "proveing"?
Sheesh
I retract the functional part of functional illiterate and
apologize
to all functional illiterates for any insult I may have caused/ >>>>>>>>>
You seem to be tripping over yourself.
Why are you so cruel to irony meters? What have they done to you to >>>>>>>deserve
this outrageous abuse?
--
PV
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and >>>>>>>drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever."
- Aristophanes
Does that mean you are suffering from an aneurism PV?
--
If so, the aneurism was caused by trying to understand was passes for >>>>>logic
in your posts.
If you can understand logic RW.
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist >>>>>> rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New >>>>>> Year
2013
I have shown quite clearly that I can understand logic. Understanding >>>some
of your posts, however, requires an understanding of gibberish and fundy >>>lunacy that I do not have.
You and Grosvenor must share the smae room at Alberta Hospital Edmonton.
I point out the logic, spelling and grammar errors rampant in your posts, >and you question my sanity? Ironically funny, coming from you. And as I >have told you many times, the only dealing I have with Grossie are to call >him on his blatent anti-semitism, I have no idea why you keep connecting me >to him.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Merry Christmas 2012 and Happy New Year >> 2013
$"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message $news:kaogcj$h7o$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
What a pair of jokers RW and PV are.$
$How are pointing out your errors and asking you to back up your claims $joking?
[Default] On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:55:31 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium "Robert Weldon" <roborat13@hotmail.com> wrote:
$"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
$news:kaogcj$h7o$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
What a pair of jokers RW and PV are.$
$How are pointing out your errors and asking you to back up your claims
$joking?
It's an attempt by the doctor to defelct the fact he hasn't cleaned
out the cat's litter box in at least six weeks?
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,045 |
| Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
| Uptime: | 76:12:30 |
| Calls: | 501,703 |
| Calls today: | 30 |
| Files: | 104,420 |
| D/L today: |
18,441 files (5,224M bytes) |
| Messages: | 298,285 |
| Posted today: | 2 |