I just wonder if the main stream internet is making people dumb these days. I see the primary search engines as shopping tools more than research tools. I wonder if the long term use and hooks the main stream internet is offering by the mega corps is nothing more than their tool
for international enslavement via mass consumer psycology.
I reason with data collection data marketing, data selling, agragation, mining, and analytics for the primary purpose of productivity gains in
all avenues leading to consumer based society instead of information based.
I just wonder if the main stream internet is making people dumb thesedays.
I see the primary search engines as shopping tools more than research tools.
I wonder if the long term use and hooks the main stream internet is offering by the mega corps is nothing more than their tool for international enslavement via mass consumer psycology.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this and how to put an end to
it?
I reason with data collection data marketing, data selling,
agragation, mining, and analytics for the primary purpose of
productivity gains in all avenues leading to consumer based society instead of information based.
Let me know what you think.
I just wonder if the main stream internet is making people dumb these days.
I wonder if the long term use and hooks the main
stream internet is offering by the mega corps is nothing more than
their tool for international enslavement via mass consumer psycology.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this and how to put an end to
it?
Let me know what you think.
The general public is certainly dumbed down by the internet,
especially since it's at one's fingertips.
In my view, technology is supposed to "help" humans do their jobs
faster and easier, NOT do their jobs for them. A computer is a tool,
like a hammer or screwdriver.
Productivity is certainly affected to the negative...as most would
rather be on social media than working.
Richard Menedetter wrote to Orbitman <=-Richard, I do see your points for sure. I see things a little different because I am looking at this a little differently lately. Seeing content and hearing young people discuss what they see, when I view the internet as a tool for information the likes I've never had access to as a child. I see some of these young poeople wasting this access away due to content being provided to them that is far more stimulating than content they should be seeking. Cost to product content like those really interesting documentaries is so much more expensive than costs of many main stream media, and the return on investment is the primary driver. Some educational content just doesn't provide the same level of monetary return as sexually, and fashion, in-vogue products.
Hi Orbitman!Its a bit of both. The mega corps are perverting it to make available mostly content that is dumbing down its users, to insure they continue to gain profits. Its like feeding your kids coolaid. You are feeding them water, and other components, they can if they want remove the other components from the water to purify it, if you showed them how, provided the tools, told them were to get them, or showed them many other things, but since you profit a bit from this coolaid action you don't have a desire to highlight how to provide just the water. If they want it you charge them the cost in profits you would have otherwise obtained if you sold them coolaid. Now you create a emerging markets and profit from water purification packets, starting with just info, not real tools, ...etc continuing to make a market for your next demographic you are actually in control of.
09 Aug 2017 19:02, from Orbitman -> Bbsing Bbs:
The general public is certainly dumbed down by the internet,
especially since it's at one's fingertips.
Is it dumbed down by the Internet or by the general public?
I think you are looking at it from the wrong side.Some people have no idea there is other things out there. Documentaries are usually paid for by the viewer whereas Fox News is free for everyone and widely distributed.
Same with TV, if you constantly watch Big Brother or Fox News, it is
your fault.
You could watch a documentary about Particle Physics instead.
If there is no market for Big Brother, they would not show it.
But that is NOT the fault of the TV, but of the general public.TV is not to blame, but if you remove it some symptoms resulting from its use also go away. Those who are allowed to broadcast on specific channels certainly don't force you to watch, but you can't broadcast on their channels without corps and govs coming at you, nor can you reshape their broadcast to be healthier.
Nobody forces the general public to look at Facebook.Think back to the time of Descartes, and how scientists had been subverted by mainstream media, so they would not publish or express scientific advancements for fear of death by the mainstream organizations of their time. This is similar to the kind of thing happening now, but it a way more sophisticated way.
They could as well download an EBook from Descartes, or some scientific paper and read that.
It is NOT the Internets fault that people do not do that very often.Some can, and do, but others just don't know how to.
They COULD do it, if they wanted to.
So the question we need to ask ourselves is why are they not motivatedRM this is a great question and why in part I got this discussion started.
to do so?
In my view, technology is supposed to "help" humans do their jobsMany tools are used in a way they shouldn't be used. There are many rules now preventing all of us from circumventing the current design of these tools we are using.
faster and easier, NOT do their jobs for them. A computer is a tool,
like a hammer or screwdriver.
Exactly, and that tool was never better and more versatile than ever!
You just need to make use of it!
Productivity is certainly affected to the negative...as most would
rather be on social media than working.
Is that the fault of "the Internet" or the fault of the people?
CU, Ricsi
--- GoldED+/LNX
* Origin: Anarchists of the world - UNITE!! (2:310/31)
Richard Menedetter wrote to Nick Andre <=-I think the quality has dropped considerably even over the past few years. I've looked at some news .. what they claim is news, and its a single short paragraph with large font surrounded by tones of add space. Libraries have books with lots of pages.
Hi Nick!
Sorry for the late reply ...
14 Aug 2017 04:38, from Nick Andre -> Richard Menedetter:
While that may be true, the information available is in most cases no different than one can (and have) obtained from libraries.
You have much easier access to geographically diverse information.This is true.
Etc.I wish this was the case. That was my hope and dream and still is, the information age! We could have it, but corps ... they've stolen the dream! data became a traded commodity vs its real use information, not money. It could be a lot cheaper, but ... its just being monetized.. like that is what drives people, .. usually no, but due the collective consciousness of corps about the all gains and growth vs all good and sustained, everyone has to play their game or fall behind financially and literacy (must keep working). The information age should have set many free, and make us more freer people!
Remember the early to mid 90's... The world did not suddenly morph
into some magical utopia when the Internet became popular, nor would
the "information superhighway" bring us together or improve our social standings with eachother by removing those geographical limits.
It depends on how technology is used.This is what allows the dumbing down, while it could also allow global education and understanding, but .. what is going on? Separation, ignorance, misunderstanding, misinformation at a rapid pace on a global scale.
But the fact remains that it is now much quicker and easier to
communicate with people from other continents, etc.
In fact, I think the opposite happened. People by and large just stareAgree! I've asked people why, why take a picture of your food, how many times have you looked at those pictures going back ... say 7 years. They don't really have good answers, not answers for reasons that would be logical, but more so about feelings or emotional based reasons.
off into their smartphones, or are addicted to Facebook, or seem
compelled to share pictures of what theyre about to have for supper. Cybercrime is more advanced and prevailent than ever nowadays.
There we are again, that it depends on how technology is used.Its nutty how fake news is spreading. At one point people were able to shed light on major media corps with simple small cameras and posting them on the internet, even some of the older smart phones, but now.. now you can be put in place of another and it can be almost undetectable. This was all before major censorship over the past 1.5 years.
And it also requires more education on the user side.
Eg. checking the crowd sizes for inauguration and to fact check "fake news"
I realise its not all doom and gloom and there are a few good websitesNot all doom and gloom is true. Think about how we (us on this board use the nets vs, basic smart phoners).
out there, but IMO western society's social skillset and intelligence level did not improve whatsoever by the Internet.
That is why education is important.Yes they do, but the tools are being produced and changes so fast, they have to be simplified and dummied down for users to understand them, and this is creating quality problems as well.
People need to LEARN to use the tools that are already widely
available.
I agree with both of you. Turn on encryption and start communicating with each other without allowing the giants to take and your comms and use them to turn us all into the product.The Internet is just a tool for communication.I really wish I could share the same sentiments, truth is, the
You need to select with WHOM you communicate.
Internet is by and large powered by companies who by and large earn profits by tracking and manipulating individual's on-line activity. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc.
educationI'll have to look this up.
Learn to use Privacy Badger, Adaware and other useful tools.
EFF is usually a good read on those topics.
One interesting part is browser fingerprinting. https://panopticlick.eff.org/
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,020 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 12:28:28 |
Calls: | 503,343 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 107,261 |
D/L today: |
29,358 files (2,071M bytes) |
Messages: | 441,662 |