Sourceforge changed all CVS repositories to being 'read only' back in November of 2017. Has anyone done any work converting the project over
to something else? At least SVN, if not GIT... Had been doing an CVS->GIT (GIT is what I prefer these days...) import but need to set something up again. Would much prefer just using an 'official' repository. (I'm a member of the project but not an admin...)
06 Jan 18 13:06, you wrote to all:
Sourceforge changed all CVS repositories to being 'read only' backin
November of 2017. Has anyone done any work converting the projectover
to something else? At least SVN, if not GIT... Had been doing an CVS->GIT (GIT is what I prefer these days...) import but need to set something up again. Would much prefer just using an 'official' repository. (I'm a member of the project but not an admin...)
At this point it's probably best to move it to GitHub.
From what I understand, binaries for GoldED+ could be made available for download from a GitHub Pages site.
At this point it's probably best to move it to GitHub.
Any particular reason?
From what I understand, binaries for GoldED+ could be made
available for download from a GitHub Pages site.
Yes, there are a number of ways one can do that. (I have or am associated with a number of projects at GitHub...) But they do not,
to my knowledge, have a file mirroring network like Sourceforge does.
something up again. Would much prefer just using an 'official'
repository. (I'm a member of the project but not an admin...)
At this point it's probably best to move it to GitHub.
Any particular reason?
From what I understand, binaries for GoldED+ could be made available
for download from a GitHub Pages site.
Yes, there are a number of ways one can do that. (I have or am associated with a number of projects at GitHub...) But they do not, to
my knowledge, have a file mirroring network like Sourceforge does.
SF yesterday announced an autommatic GitHub import tool, so you can keep code on GitHub and binaries on SF. Woudln't this work for Golded repo?
Yes, there are a number of ways one can do that. (I have or am associated with a number of projects at GitHub...) But they do not,
to my knowledge, have a file mirroring network like Sourceforge does.
Greetings, traveler ...
12 Jan 18 11:55, you wrote to andrew clarke:
At this point it's probably best to move it to GitHub.
Any particular reason?
Other than 'everyone doing so'? Not sure ...
From what I understand, binaries for GoldED+ could be made
available for download from a GitHub Pages site.
Yes, there are a number of ways one can do that. (I have or am associated with a number of projects at GitHub...) But they do not, to my knowledge, have a file mirroring network like Sourceforge does.
SF yesterday announced an autommatic GitHub import tool, so you can keep code on GitHub and binaries on SF.
Woudln't this work for Golded repo?
Hello Rj,
Friday January 12 2018, Rj Clay wrote to andrew clarke:
Yes, there are a number of ways one can do that. (I have or am associated with a number of projects at GitHub...) But they do not, to my knowledge, have a file mirroring network like Sourceforge does.
You were the first to whom I sent an invitation to join the huskyproject on GitHub. But the invitation is still pending. Haven't you received it?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,146 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 09:33:35 |
Calls: | 229,974 |
Files: | 59,434 |
D/L today: |
11 files (67,609K bytes) |
Messages: | 293,882 |