Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and
Synchronet (See Below if it does it again).
Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and
Synchronet (See Below if it does it again).
Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and Synchronet (See Below if it does it again).
Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and Synchronet (See
Below if it does it again).
Allen
Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and Synchronet
Below if it does it again).
Anyone know how to stop the double origin lines with Golded and
Synchronet (See Below if it does it again).
=== GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
# Origin: LiveWire - Synchronet Experiment (1:2320/101)
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
@MSGID: 1:2320/101 589fc62d
@REPLY: 1:393/68 589f4533
@PID: GED+W32 1.1.5-b20161221
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.28 Feb 7 2017 MSC 1800
@CHRS: CP437 2
@TZUTC: -0500
Hello Ben!
Replying to a msg dated 11 Feb 17 11:07, from you to me.
Thanks Ben... I went ahead and disabled both to see what happens.
Hopefully SBBSECHO will insert the proper MSGID and REPLYTO
Allen
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32218/700
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
SEEN-BY: 16/101 18/200 34/999 90/1 116/18 123/140 500 128/187 140/1
SEEN-BY: 222/2 230/150 240/1120 249/303 250/1 261/38 100 266/404 267/155 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 282/1031 1056 292/907 908 320/119 219 340/400 393/68 SEEN-BY: 396/45 712/848 801/161 189 2320/100 3634/12 15 22 24 27 50
@PATH: 2320/101 100 203/0 230/150 261/38 3634/12
=== GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
# Origin: LiveWire - Synchronet Experiment (1:2320/101)
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
The line beginning with " * Origin:" is the origin line. The one beginning with " # Origin:" is no origin line. Same for the tagline "--- ".
As golded works correct with origin lines by default you better fix
that SBBS software. Modification of origin lines was XAB once and is
still annoying.
I had the same problem when I installed Golded+ on another Linux
machine here. I simply told one to stop using an origin line. There usually a config entry keyword that will en/disable the use of the
origin line.
I think I figured it out in Synchronet. I would rather leave the
Golded origins in first so if there's problems I can figure out if
it's golded or sync.
I had the same problem when I installed Golded+ on another Linux
machine here. I simply told one to stop using an origin line. There
usually a config entry keyword that will en/disable the use of the
origin line.
I think I figured it out in Synchronet. I would rather leave the Golded origins in first so if there's problems I can figure out if it's golded or sync.
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
# Origin: LiveWire - Synchronet Experiment (1:2320/101)
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
@MSGID: 1:2320/101 58a0b761
@REPLY: 1:282/1031.0 5506e42a
@TID: SBBSecho 3.00-Win32 r3.28 Feb 7 2017 MSC 1800
@CHRS: CP437 2
@TZUTC: -0500
Hello Jeff!
12 Feb 17 00:24, you wrote to me:
I had the same problem when I installed Golded+ on another Linux
machine here. I simply told one to stop using an origin line. There
usually a config entry keyword that will en/disable the use of the
origin line.
I think I figured it out in Synchronet. I would rather leave the Golded origins in first so if there's problems I can figure out if it's golded or sync.
Allen
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
# Origin: LiveWire - Synchronet Experiment (1:2320/101)
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
SEEN-BY: 109/500 116/116 120/544 123/5 52 111 400 500 789 1970
124/5013
5014
SEEN-BY: 135/300 140/1 154/10 203/0 226/600 229/426 261/38 280/464 320/119 SEEN-BY: 322/759 342/11 2320/100 101 3634/12 15 22 24 27 50
@PATH: 2320/101 100 123/500 3634/12
As golded works correct with origin lines by default you better
fix that SBBS software. Modification of origin lines was XAB once
and is still annoying.
sbbsecho works properly
sbbsecho's negating is properly done and is not a violation of any FTN specs...
As golded works correct with origin lines by default you better fix
that SBBS software. Modification of origin lines was XAB once and is
still annoying.
sbbsecho works properly
Then why the original poster is asking how to fix it?
Why there are answers how to fix it?
Replacement of existing origin lines is NOT properly. There is one
real origin line only: The first one of the original writer.
sbbsecho's negating is properly done and is not a violation of any
FTN specs...
It is common practice that mailcontent including the original origin
line is transported unmodified within Fidonet as long as i can
remember.
sbbsecho works properly
Then why the original poster is asking how to fix it?
he wasn't asking how to fix golded or sbbsecho... he was asking how to
fix the double tear and origin lines...
sbbsecho works properly
Then why the original poster is asking how to fix it?
he wasn't asking how to fix golded or sbbsecho... he was asking how
to fix the double tear and origin lines...
...with golded and synchronet. I recived his mail too, that's why you can't trump me with "alternate facts".
sbbsecho works properly
Then why the original poster is asking how to fix it?
he wasn't asking how to fix golded or sbbsecho... he was asking
how to fix the double tear and origin lines...
...with golded and synchronet. I recived his mail too, that's why
you can't trump me with "alternate facts".
don't insult me like that ever again... it is/was a configuration
problem, not a software code problem as your statement indicated...
your brush was too broad and the wrong color... i pointed that out and
now you are the one dumping crap like that? piss off...
Replacement of existing origin lines is NOT properly. There is one
real origin line only: The first one of the original writer.
incorrect... the last origin line is the valid one... are you not aware
of how proper FTN<->FTN gating is done? they use the same as is documented...
sbbsecho's negating is properly done and is not a violation of any
FTN specs...
It is common practice that mailcontent including the original origin
line is transported unmodified within Fidonet as long as i can
remember.
it is transported unmodified...
it originates on that system and is packed with two tear and origin lines... nothing has changed that along the path...
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
# Origin: LiveWire - Synchronet Experiment (1:2320/101)
* Origin: LiveWire BBS - Synchronet Test Node (1:2320/101)
welll... uummmm... i was pretty sure that sbbsecho had a way to not
place the origin line if there was one already in place on locally
written posts... you should ask DM about this in the synchronet echo... they've recently done work on sbbsecho that someone else wrote years
ago... this should be a simple check to add...
local message?
does it already have an origin line?
no: add one
yes: skip adding one
Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer
doin' it wrong...
It is common practice that mailcontent including the original origin
line is transported unmodified within Fidonet as long as i can
remember.
it is transported unmodified...
No it is transported and changed, at the local machine between the software packages.
Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer
doin' it wrong...
Writing this in every msg from you for many months can be considered as spam!
It is common practice that mailcontent including the original
origin line is transported unmodified within Fidonet as long as
i can remember.
it is transported unmodified...
No it is transported and changed, at the local machine between
the software packages.
no... it is not ""transported""... it sits in a message base with the golded origin line on it and the tosser scans it out and adds another
one instead of using intelligence and detecting there is one already
in place...
perhaps you should actually install the software in question and see
how it really operates instead of making wild assumptions like so many others...
It is common practice that mailcontent including the original originplace...
line is transported unmodified within Fidonet as long as i can
remember.
it is transported unmodified...
No it is transported and changed, at the local machine between the
software packages.
no... it is not ""transported""... it sits in a message base with the golded origin line on it and the tosser scans it out and adds another one instead of using intelligence and detecting there is one already in
perhaps you should actually install the software in question and see how
it really operates instead of making wild assumptions like so many others...
perhaps you should actually install the software in question and see
how it really operates instead of making wild assumptions like so
many others...
No need for me, because i rely on your statement above. You
contradicted your own statement "not transported" in the same
sentance.
The process of the outgoing mail from the saved unsend message to
other systems is mail transportation.
It includes tosser, mailer and maybe trackers that are used in the transportation process.
No need for me, because i rely on your statement above. You
contradicted your own statement "not transported" in the same
sentance.
no i did not...
The process of the outgoing mail from the saved unsend message to
other systems is mail transportation.
no it is not... it is packaging... shipping comes later...
"A parcel is a package bearing the name and address of the recipient
in order to be routed through the services of a postal service"
"Packaging is the technology of enclosing or protecting products for distribution"
"A network packet is a formatted unit of data carried by a
packet-switched network"
It includes tosser, mailer and maybe trackers that are used in
the transportation process.
nope... the tosser is the packager... netmail trackers are quality control... mailers are shipping... shipping is transportation...
No need for me, because i rely on your statement above. You
contradicted your own statement "not transported" in the same
sentance.
no i did not...
The process of the outgoing mail from the saved unsend message to
other systems is mail transportation.
no it is not... it is packaging... shipping comes later...
It includes tosser, mailer and maybe trackers that are used in the transportation process.
nope... the tosser is the packager... netmail trackers are quality control... mailers are shipping... shipping is transportation...
The process of the outgoing mail from the saved unsend message to
other systems is mail transportation.
no it is not... it is packaging... shipping comes later...
Maybe our understanding is lost in translation.
Calm down, review your arguments and you will understand why your
point of view deserves such a comment.
If he says I have SBBSECHO not configured right and it's effecting
Golded I almost assuredly can take it to the bank that I have an issue with SBBSECHO.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,146 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 110:07:03 |
Calls: | 230,073 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 59,456 |
D/L today: |
5 files (38,429K bytes) |
Messages: | 293,870 |
Posted today: | 9 |