165
Hello alterego,
Infact.. the original nodelist *was* a bbs list.
Bzzzt! Wrong.
The nodelist has always contained info for mailer sessions. Most
entries
So the only point that breaks down for me, is why was the "MO" flag created, if the nodelist was never intended for human consumption as
well?
I could come up with a couple of reasons for you but off the top of my head I don't know.
Your the FTSC guy.. not me, aren't we supposed to be asking you such questions!
Sure, as technology as evolved, mailers no longer use POTS to
communicate, but IP - so port definitions were created to faciliate
that. I think its reasonable for the human element to evolve to
include the port info as well.
I'm going to ramble on a bit now. Feel free to move on at this point if you'd rather skip Al's musings.
Let me start by saying I think it's a good idea to include BBS connect info in the nodelist. If there was a way to include it in the nodelist I would be first
to update my own BBS info (if I had any) and those in my net. But I think that is problematical, let me explain why.
The nodelist has been a problem since day one. A good number of people have worked like dogs to bring it to where it is today. BBS connection info was never a consideration and that is largely why it is not included today.
In the heyday of BBSing the size of the nodelist was an issue. It took a long time to apply a diff and recompile the nodelist. The time it took to scrape the
nodelist for the desired info was also an issue.
The above is not an issue today but those issues have a lot to do with where we
are today.
The nodelist has evolved, the most recent evolution was the inclusion of protocol:port numbers. There have been other evolutions too but that will suffice for this example.
I think the nodelist does a pretty good job of doing what it was intended to do.
I think there is a good argument for adding BBS connect info to the nodelist but nodelist tools would need updating. I would not add my own BBS connect info
today for fear of breaking my friends nodelist compiler.
I just scrapped this out of the current (Fidonet) nodelist..
=== Cut ===
o The FidoNet NodeList is compiled so that computer systems within FidoNet
may communicate with each other. Use and intra-FidoNet distribution
rights are granted to all FidoNet system operators for the purposes of
communication within FidoNet or applying for a FidoNet node number. SEEN-BY: 1/100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 SEEN-BY: 1/117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 133 134 SEEN-BY: 1/135 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 SEEN-BY: 1/153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 171 SEEN-BY: 1/172 173 174 175 176 178 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 SEEN-BY: 1/191 192 193 194 195 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 SEEN-BY: 1/209 211 212 214 215 217 218 219 220 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 SEEN-BY: 1/230 231 232 233 234 235 236 616 995 2/100 101 106 107 108 111 114 SEEN-BY: 2/115 116 118 128 130 132 137 138 140 141 145 147 150 151 159 160 161 SEEN-BY: 2/162 163 167 1202 3/100 4/100 106 5/100