I am thinking MUSIC and VIDEO could be merged to MEDIA or ENTERTAINMENT. Maybe we can prune the echo list to the best 20 out of the 27 we have right now.
But these are different topics. An ENTERTAINMENT echo could also include GAMES with or without MUSIC. SPORTS might be ENTERTAINMENT too and the discussed topics in FSX_SPORTS is mostly about sports on TV which is
VIDEO and ENTERTAINMENT. But this has nothing to with MUSIC ...
Maybe we should merge several echos to FOODGARDENINGDIYHAMRETRO?
Honestly, what is it with the obsession to merge / tidy up echo areas?
Is this some kind of Fidonet trauma or OCD? ;)
I am thinking MUSIC and VIDEO could be merged to MEDIA or ENTERTAINMENT. Maybe we can prune the echo list to the best 20 out of the 27 we have right now.
Maybe we should merge several echos to FOODGARDENINGDIYHAMRETRO?
But these are different topics. An ENTERTAINMENT echo could also include GAMES with or without MUSIC. SPORTS might be
ENTERTAINMENT too and the discussed topics in FSX_SPORTS is mostly about sports on TV which is VIDEO and ENTERTAINMENT. But
this has nothing to with MUSIC ...
we're not on dialup any more where bits means minutes. the transfer
speed at which we send them nowadays doesn't compare to before so to be fair, it's not really a big issue, especially seeing as how little use they get right now... if they were like the heyday of usenet then yea i could see it, but righ tnow i just don't see the reason for the effort.
regards
Charles Blackburn
SYSOP - The F.B.O BBS 21:1/221
Aviation related fun @ bbs.thefbo.us IPV4 and IPV6
DOVE-Net FSX-Net USENET
Coming soon: FIDO-Net
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: The FBO BBS - bbs.thefbo.us (21:1/221)
In reading this thread, I keep coming back to what is the reason for consolidating the forums? Is it due to "clutter" or space or ?? There's not the abundance of forums like FidoNet that appear to be dead. Paul, your the ZC and can due what you want. But if we knew your thought process, we could could "jump on the band wagon" or not. Me, I'll
I am thinking MUSIC and VIDEO could be merged to MEDIA or ENTERTAINMENT. Maybe we can prune the echo list to the best 20 out of the 27 we have right now.
... They say there's always one weirdo on the bus, but I couldn't find them!
On 09-18-22 09:13, Oli wrote to MATT MUNSON <=-
But these are different topics. An ENTERTAINMENT echo could also
include GAMES with or without MUSIC. SPORTS might be ENTERTAINMENT too
and the discussed topics in FSX_SPORTS is mostly about sports on TV
which is VIDEO and ENTERTAINMENT. But this has nothing to with MUSIC
...
On 09-18-22 14:27, ogg wrote to Charles Blackburn <=-
In reading this thread, I keep coming back to what is the reason for consolidating the forums? Is it due to "clutter" or space or ??
There's not the abundance of forums like FidoNet that appear to be
dead. Paul, your the ZC and can due what you want. But if we knew your thought process, we could could "jump on the band wagon" or not. Me,
I'll follow your lead as to what ever you decide. A few slow forums
don't bother me, yet!
I am thinking MUSIC and VIDEO could be merged to MEDIA or
ENTERTAINMENT. Maybe we can prune the echo list to the best 20 out of
the 27 we have right now.
... They say there's always one weirdo on the bus, but I couldn't
find them!
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/15 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Inland Utopia Mail Center (21:4/108)
One thing I would like to see is a sysops area, specially for things
like hosekeeping, new and removed groups and the like. I don't have
time to check often and when I do, there's like 500 new posts. It's
hard to go through and determine which is important sysops stuff and
what's just chaff.
Isn't that what fsx_net is supposed to be?
One thing I would like to see is a sysops area, specially for things
like hosekeeping, new and removed groups and the like. I don't have
time to check often and when I do, there's like 500 new posts. It's
hard to go through and determine which is important sysops stuff and what's just chaff.
One thing I would like to see is a sysops area, specially for things like hosekeeping, new and removed groups and the like. I don't have time to check often and when I do, there's like 500 new posts. It's hard to go through and determine which is important sysops stuff and what's just chaff.
Isn't that what fsx_net is supposed to be?
Isn't that what fsx_net is supposed to be?
I would say no considering the amount of junk that's in there like stats. --- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
Isn't that what fsx_net is supposed to be?
I would say no considering the amount of junk that's in there like stats.
Please explain... do you mean stats I posted recently when discussing should echos be retained or not?
There is no sysop only area in fsxNet. I think that users and their input is just as important as sysops and that is why the area is open to all.
There is no sysop only area in fsxNet. I think that users and their input is >> just as important as sysops and that is why the area is open to all.
Users don't maintain the BBS and or have to add/remove areas.
Maybe I should delete sysops functions to my users :)
If the _NET group is supposed to be what other nets would call a
SYSOP only group, fair enough then I'll pay more attention to it.
Nigel Reed wrote to apam <=-
Re: Re: Merger of forums
By: apam to Nigel Reed on Fri Sep 30 2022 09:27:17
Isn't that what fsx_net is supposed to be?
I would say no considering the amount of junk that's in there like
stats.
Re: Re: Merger of forums
By: Avon to Nigel Reed on Fri Sep 30 2022 20:47:25
Please explain... do you mean stats I posted recently when discussing s echos be retained or not?
TBH, I thought they were something posted on a regular basis or
something. Merging or not of groups really doesn't interest me any. I
just add them when they're added and remove them when they're not.
The thing is, it needs to be clearly visible when I need to make a
change on my system. I cannot check in daily, sometimes not weekly
either, so it's easy to miss something. If the _NET group is supposed to be what other nets would call a SYSOP only group, fair enough then I'll pay more attention to it. --- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
The thing is, it needs to be clearly visible when I need to make a
change on my system. I cannot check in daily, sometimes not weekly
It is, but it is not a "announcement-only" echo that some "big boss of the network" fills with commands to the servants (sysops).
It is also for discussing changes like the possible changes in the
echo structure and other things that are relevant for most sysops.
At least, that's my understanding of it.
I think those posts are in a different echo now, like FSX_STATS or some-such.
I should be using the fsxnet.nz website more often also to post such things
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,042 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 02:13:16 |
Calls: | 500,920 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 109,372 |
D/L today: |
17,931 files (2,697M bytes) |
Messages: | 305,081 |
Posted today: | 7 |