I think Tyson will win, or Jake, one of the two.
I can't decide but it'll be on Netflix and my kids are making me watch it.
I think Tyson will win, or Jake, one of the two.
I can't decide but it'll be on Netflix and my kids are making me watch
Netflix engineers clearly not ready for the load on their system, felt like i was watching on AOL.
I didn't watch the fight, but that bugs me about streaming services. If it was televized on broadcast/cable TV, there wouldn't be any streaming issues. I know a few people who were also watching the fight last night and they were having buffering issues too.
I didn't watch, but I'd be amazed if Tyson didn't win.
As much as people will automatically blame Netflix for the buffering,
it's really hard for an ISP to model a network for these kinds of
peaks, which are often more than one order of magnitude above
"normal" peak traffic levels.
Then seeing Tyson geting repeatedly punched in the face by a guy half his age, with Paul spritzing himself with with his own brand of body spray like a fish out of water trying to stay moist.
Ugh. Nothing against WWE, but when did boxing become WWE?
Netflix engineers clearly not ready for the load on their system, felt like i was watching on AOL.
I can't get that hour of my life back can I
I didn't watch the fight, but that bugs me about streaming services. If it was televized on broadcast/cable TV, there wouldn't be any streaming issues. I know a few people who were also watching the fight last night and they were having buffering issues too.
Replying to myself... After hearing about the cluster-f the whole thing turned out to be, I guess I'm less 'amazed' he didn't win but I'll admit my guess on who won was wrong.
A few years ago, I remember idubbz (or however you spell his handle) did
a YouTube boxing special called 'Creator Clash' or something that was a huge hit and streamed on YouTube.. not sure why Netflix dropped the ball so bad on this special.
So true. What's funny though? We watched it on a pirated ppv feed on iptv, quality was perfect and it only buffered twice for 3 seconds. Watched the entire almost 4 hours.
I recall yelling the same thing at the TV after about the 15th time the buffering kicked in. It's a top reason to bring BD's back to the retail stores. The audio sucked too, frequently going out during key moments of
Replying to myself... After hearing about the cluster-f the whole thing turned out to be, I guess I'm less 'amazed' he didn't win but I'll admit my guess on who won was wrong.
buffering kicked in. It's a top reason to bring BD's back to the retail stores. The audio sucked too, frequently going out during key moments
Mind you, I don't want to have all these physical things (and generally don't keep them for long), but media is _so_ much nicer when it comes with a side of being able to control it myself.
Netflix engineers clearly not ready for the load on their system, fel like i was watching on AOL.
I didn't watch the fight, but that bugs me about streaming services. If it was televized on broadcast/cable TV, there wouldn't be any streaming issues. I know a few people who were also watching the fight last night and they were having buffering issues too.
Nightfox
I'd be okay if they sold them as DRM-free downloadable media (and I
could back them up on an external hard drive), but unfortunately they don't. Thus, I'm one of the people who likes to buy the discs and rip them (and since they make 4K discs somewhat tricky to rip, I've done
some research and bought an optical drive for my PC capable of ripping
4K discs).
If companies want to treat me like a pirate, I want to pay for things
like a pirate.
BD, as in blu-ray discs? I still like to buy them, and these days I
often buy them from Amazon or other online retailers.
I've been using DVDs to make my Jellyfin collection, and it's a nice experience.
BluRay would probably require me to get a much more impressive media server. But I watch things on either a small-ish computer monitor, or a pocket projector with terrible resolution, so it'd mostly be wasted
space.
Mind you, I don't want to have all these physical things (and generally don't keep them for long), but media is _so_ much nicer when it comes
with a side of being able to control it myself.
[...] I remember cancelling my Apple Music subscription
and losing saved music. I felt a bit cheated after
several months of membership fees; despite knowing I
signed up for that.
I've had getting Jellyfin up and going for some time now, I bought the gear for it even. I just haven't had the time. The interface looks
like a nice replacement for Netflix if I can get my entire collection on the server.
You don't miss the joy and pleasure of removing the plastic from the cassette, CD, DVD, etc.. and getting that "new media" smell? I suppose it's a bit nostalgic, maybe a bit hoarding, or to your point, just
Amazon, I haven't in some time, it was (in the distant past) more complicated for me to find the new releases (if I didn't know what they were ..) than an end cap at a store however I'm sure that has changed.
I've had getting Jellyfin up and going for some time now, IYeah, once you have enough stuff in it, it really does feel like using
a decent streaming service.
Well, sure, that's pleasant, but then there's the unpleasantness of
having a pile of stuff that has questionable amounts of usage.
BluRay would probably require me to get a much more impressive media
server. But I watch things on either a small-ish computer monitor, or a
pocket projector with terrible resolution, so it'd mostly be wasted
space.
That will be my fear (or love .. haven't figured that one out yet) is more hard drives. I have 36tb, whats another XX?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,042 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 01:40:41 |
Calls: | 500,919 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 109,372 |
D/L today: |
16,874 files (2,547M bytes) |
Messages: | 305,076 |
Posted today: | 7 |