1. Forum
  2. fsxNet
  3. FSX BBS

  • Word wrap

    From Utopian Galt@21:4/108 to All on Mon Aug 12 18:23:24 2024
    It seems when I post a reply on my winserver bbs the word wrap just becomes a hot mess when replying to a synchronet
    based bbs.


    --- WWIV 5.8.1.3688[Windows]
    * Origin: inland utopia * california * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (21:4/108)
  • From Accession@21:1/200 to Utopian Galt on Tue Aug 13 17:16:40 2024
    On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:23:24 -0700, you wrote:

    It seems when I post a reply on my winserver bbs the word wrap just becomes a hot mess when replying to a synchronet
    based bbs.

    I imagine Winserver doesn't support format flowed text? Synchronet doesn't hard wrap text at 80 columns, which might be what Winserver is looking for.

    Try quoting a message that was created with Golded. You may see similar results as to what you're seeing when quoting messages that originate on a Synchronet BBS.

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (21:1/200)
  • From Alonzo@21:1/130 to Utopian Galt on Wed Aug 14 01:02:51 2024
    It seems when I post a reply on my winserver bbs the word wrap just becomes a hot mess when replying to a synchronet
    based bbs.

    Yeah, I know the feeling. I have a Mystic BBS and the word
    wrap doesn't really work. I get around it by just making
    sure each line of text is kept short.

    ... "No comment" is a comment.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: From the depths of Bunker 3 (21:1/130)
  • From Utopian Galt@21:4/108 to Accession on Wed Aug 14 21:40:09 2024
    BY: Accession (21:1/200)

    |11A|09> |10I imagine Winserver doesn't support format flowed text? Synchronet|07
    |11A|09> |10doesn't hard wrap text at 80 columns, which might be what Winserver is|07
    |11A|09> |10looking for.|07
    |11A|09> |07
    |11A|09> |10Try quoting a message that was created with Golded. You may see similar|07
    |11A|09> |10results as to what you're seeing when quoting messages that originate on|07
    |11A|09> |10a Synchronet BBS.|07
    That is why I was trying to maybe switch to Talisman in the future.


    --- WWIV 5.8.1.3688[Windows]
    * Origin: inland utopia * california * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (21:4/108)
  • From Accession@21:1/200 to Utopian Galt on Thu Aug 15 06:17:20 2024
    On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:40:08 -0700, you wrote:

    BY: Accession (21:1/200)

    !11A!09>> !10I imagine Winserver doesn't support format flowed text?
    Synchronet!07
    !11A!09>> !10doesn't hard wrap text at 80 columns, which might be what
    Winserver is!07
    !11A!09>> !10looking for.!07
    !11A!09>> !07
    !11A!09>> !10Try quoting a message that was created with Golded. You may
    see similar!07
    !11A!09>> !10results as to what you're seeing when quoting messages that
    originate on!07
    !11A!09>> !10a Synchronet BBS.!07

    That is why I was trying to maybe switch to Talisman in the future.

    Obviously, use whatever makes you happy, and keeps you interested in the hobby. I think some softwares leave it to the person reading the messages' software in regards to how the messages are displayed, and some softwares don't, while hard wrapping at 78-80 columns.

    For the record, the above is what your message looks like when you quote and add color codes into it. (I changed the pipes to exclamation marks so you would see the actual text that's being added, instead of the colors).

    As it's for a display thing on the BBS itself, WWIV should probably strip the color codes from the messages before exporting them outside of the local machine.

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (21:1/200)
  • From Digital Man to Utopian Galt on Fri Aug 16 17:32:17 2024
    Re: Word wrap
    By: Utopian Galt to All on Mon Aug 12 2024 06:23 pm

    It seems when I post a reply on my winserver bbs the word wrap just becomes a hot mess when replying to a synchronet
    based bbs.

    Synchronet's QWK packet support includes optional word-wrapping, if a user (or QWKnet node) needs it:
    [W] Word-wrap Message Text : Yes

    So, if getting your feed via QWK is an option, that could be a solution.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Breaking Bad quote #28:
    Gomey, got beat your pinata. - Hank Schrader
    Norco, CA WX: 88.7°F, 42.0% humidity, 8 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs