Okay, I have the board up and running on FSXnet now! tcpser (pretending to be modems) and binkd running on a raspberry pi 4, tag 2.7 and
fastecho 1.46 running on an actual (not emulated) 386. i've still got
some batch file / shell script tweaking to do, but for the most part, everything is working!
@TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 UNREG
Okay, I have the board up and running on FSXnet now! tcpser (pretending to be modems) and binkd running on a raspberry pi 4, tag 2.7 and
fastecho 1.46 running on an actual (not emulated) 386. i've still got
some batch file / shell script tweaking to do, but for the most part, everything is working!
I'm using binkd and mgetty here, with a modem connected through a USB-to-serial adapter, to get dial-up connectivity as a fallback.Yeah,I actually have a 16-bit 'high speed' ISA card with two 16550s that I'm using for nodes 1 & 2 through tcpser, but also a node 3 with a 56k modem hooked up to a VOIP line. That's 'experimental' at this point, though. I've tested it a bit calling out and it seems to work well enough. I wouldn't trust my relationship with Violet on it, but it's fine for light messaging. :)
Although the phone line is a VoIP one, so it won't work without
Internet access, but it's nice anyway. :)
Just in case you were looking for something like this...
Thanks! I sent the original author an email requesting a key, since his website says they're provided on request, but if that ends up being a deadend, I'll go the slightly more nefarious route.
Yeah, I requested one back in May of 2020, still waiting on the
response from that, hence the more... nefarious route. If I ever do
get a response I'll switch over to that one.
Are you running fastecho? If so, can I bother you if I have any
questions about setting it up?
* Origin: WalledCTTY (0:0/0)^^^^^
Thom Miller wrote to All <=-
Okay, I have the board up and running on FSXnet now! tcpser
(pretending to be modems) and binkd running on a raspberry pi 4, tag
2.7 and fastecho 1.46 running on an actual (not emulated) 386. i've
still got some batch file / shell script tweaking to do, but for the
most part, everything is working!
Fire away, I will answer if I can.
This message came through from 0:0/0, your previous messages looked
like they came from the correct address.
Wow. I still have my 386-40 around. I need to get it out one day and give it a shot! Read in another post you are running Desqview. I miss those days. I loved the 386 and loved it even more when DV was running on it.
Blue White wrote to Thom Miller <=-
Thom Miller wrote to All <=-
Wow. I still have my 386-40 around. I need to get it out one day and give it a shot! Read in another post you are running Desqview. I miss those days. I loved the 386 and loved it even more when DV was running
on it.
Thom Miller wrote to Blue White <=-
Yeah, this is a 386-33. I looked into getting one of the (faster,
better) AMD 40 MHz chips for it, but eBay wants more money than I'm willing to spend.
I didn't think they were compatible - the 386 was a PGA chip and the
AMD was a surface-mount chip.
Nope. They made pin-compatible PGA chips in addition to the surface-mount chips. I think they might be 'better known' for the surface mount chips, because I think the market was kind of flooded with sort of 'all-in-one' boards towards the end of the 386-era.
Thom Miller wrote to Blue White <=-
Yeah, this is a 386-33. I looked into getting one of the (faster,
better) AMD 40 MHz chips for it, but eBay wants more money than I'm willing to spend. I've mostly worked out the issues with DesqView and
it's running pretty well. I can leave all three nodes up and mess
around with stuff on the file system, use TheDraw, etc. while it's
going. That includes some of the network 'processes' running in their
own windows, too.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to Thom Miller <=-
Nope. They made pin-compatible PGA chips in addition to the surface-mount chips. I think they might be 'better known' for the surface mount chips, because I think the market was kind of flooded with sort of 'all-in-one' boards towards the end of the 386-era.
I didn't know that! My motherboard was a cheap one with one of the surface-mount CPUs and no co-processor socket. I was doing a lot of
coding back then, if I could have put a coprocessor on it it would have lasted a lot longer. --- SBBSecho 3.20-Win32
What kind of networking are you running with DV? I tried some back in
day but most of them would not work and play well with QEMM and DV.
What kind of networking are you running with DV? I tried some back in the day but most of them would not work and play well with QEMM and DV.
I'm using the netcat utility almost exclusively, but it also comes with a telnet client, a ftp client, an irc client, a ftp server, and a http server in addition to netcat.
I'm tempted to get an old DOS box and see if I can go 30 days with it
as my daily driver. Shell into my webhost for mail, and go old-school.
I find DOS to still be a highly usable operating system. Even when given modest multitasking capabilities under DV, it's still a lot easier for
me to stay focused on a fullscreen application than to be looking at something surrounded by a dozen other distractions.
focused on one window. MacOS though is perfectly fine addressing this
issue in a modern way. One of the reasons why I only have one Windows
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,042 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 141:47:54 |
Calls: | 500,263 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 95,201 |
D/L today: |
73 files (64,340K bytes) |
Messages: | 464,545 |