• Fastecho and HPT?

    From Jeff Smith@1:282/1031 to All on Sun Jun 12 17:58:42 2016
    Hello There,

    Will Fastecho read a HPT created JAM message base? Or will I need to somehow convert it over so that FE can use it?

    I would prefer using an existing message base than starting from scratch.



    Jeff

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2
    * Origin: The OuijaBoard - Anoka, MN (1:282/1031)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to Jeff Smith on Sun Jun 12 18:11:24 2016
    On 06/12/16, Jeff Smith said the following...

    Will Fastecho read a HPT created JAM message base? Or will I need to somehow convert it over so that FE can use it?

    I would assume so. A JAM msgbase is just that, wheather it was created by HPT or FastEcho shouldn't matter.

    I would prefer using an existing message base than starting from scratch.

    That should be possible as long as both software are sticking to the program.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A18 (Linux)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Jeff Smith@1:282/1031 to Alan Ianson on Sun Jun 12 22:33:16 2016
    Hello Alan,
    On 06/12/16, Jeff Smith said the following...

    Will Fastecho read a HPT created JAM message base? Or will I need to
    somehow convert it over so that FE can use it?

    I asked because I ran into that problem before where one tosser couldn't read the JAM message base that another tosser had created.

    I would assume so. A JAM msgbase is just that, wheather it was created
    by HPT or FastEcho shouldn't matter.

    That's what I had thought too.

    I would prefer using an existing message base than starting from scratch.

    That should be possible as long as both software are sticking to the program.

    Well... We shall see. <g>


    Jeff

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2
    * Origin: The OuijaBoard - Anoka, MN (1:282/1031)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Jeff Smith on Mon Jun 13 11:05:54 2016

    12 Jun 16 17:58, you wrote to All:

    Will Fastecho read a HPT created JAM message base? Or will I need to somehow convert it over so that FE can use it?

    I would prefer using an existing message base than starting from scratch.

    JAM is JAM is JAM... everything that support JAM should work just fine... the first gotcha i can think of, though, is the "last read" pointer used to tell the tosser what the last message scanned out was... this is one of the reasons why JAM creates the ECHOMAIL.JAM and NETMAIL.JAM files with the area names and the message numbers of the locally posted messages that need to be exported... "last read" pointers for the tossers are not needed ;)

    )\/(ark

    Always Mount a Scratch Monkey

    ... "Normal" is just a setting on the washing machine.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Jeff Smith on Mon Jun 13 11:10:24 2016

    12 Jun 16 22:33, you wrote to Alan Ianson:

    Will Fastecho read a HPT created JAM message base? Or will I need to
    somehow convert it over so that FE can use it?

    I asked because I ran into that problem before where one tosser
    couldn't read the JAM message base that another tosser had created.

    one of the tossers was out of spec... can you say which ones and the versions??
    i guess the rough date would also be good since there was some changes made during early development and adoption...

    )\/(ark

    Always Mount a Scratch Monkey

    ... Still crazy after all these years.... ;*)
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From Jeff Smith@1:282/1031 to Mark Lewis on Mon Jun 13 16:36:16 2016
    Hello Mark,

    I asked because I ran into that problem before where one tosser
    couldn't read the JAM message base that another tosser had created.

    one of the tossers was out of spec... can you say which ones and the versions?

    The reading tosser was HPT 1.4. I don't remember the tosser that created the JAM files (Could have been Gecho) although the files were of some vintage. They were from an archive that I considered making available. I only have one Win32 machine that I still use. All the other PC's here are 64 bit Linux.

    i guess the rough date would also be good since there was some changes made during early development and adoption...

    7-10 years maybe.

    ... Still crazy after all these years.... ;*)

    Does it show THAT much? <g>


    Jeff

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2
    * Origin: The OuijaBoard - Anoka, MN (1:282/1031)