• Drug Test Politicians

    From MATT MUNSON@1:123/140 to ALL on Sat Feb 14 14:57:20 2015
    Recently politicians have had an urge to drug test
    individuals on public assistance programs, but one
    congressman in Florida had to give up his seat in 2013
    due to his cocaine addiction after being a public
    advocate for drug testing food assistance recipients.

    I have a proposal that should be introduced in California
    for any public official for state, county and local
    offices who are elected. In exchange for receiving any
    pay raise the legislator would be drug tested twice a
    year randomly like professional athletes. These
    individuals are representing the general public and their
    actions affect vital public policy issues.

    In my county we had a former supervisor who was addicted
    to meth which caused him to miss many days of work. We
    also have a current supervisor who allegedly has drug use
    issues as well which makes it inconsistent with law and
    order issues that deal with his tribe.

    In the state of Kansas they actually do drug test the
    state government executives, but perhaps we should
    introduce this as a state law or a ballot proposition.
    This reform will not happen in San Bernardino County,
    since one of the wealthiest members of the board will
    block these reforms. However, we have to take this on the
    state level. I encourage my local elected officials to
    propose this as a reform
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Check Out Doc's QWK Mail Via Web BBS > DocsPlace.org (1:123/140)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to MATT MUNSON on Thu Mar 5 01:54:54 2015
    Hello Matt,

    Recently politicians have had an urge to drug test
    individuals on public assistance programs, but one
    congressman in Florida had to give up his seat in 2013
    due to his cocaine addiction after being a public
    advocate for drug testing food assistance recipients.

    Oh, come now. The first rule of politics
    is to get elected. The second rule of politics
    is to get re-elected. No politician worth his
    or her salt would dare violate either of those
    two cardinal rules.

    The politician who gave up his seat in 2013 was
    obviously a sissy, having learned his lesson from
    George W. Bush, who refused to give up his office
    after being outed by a pretzel for drinking on
    the job. And Bill Clinton, we all know how he
    got that black eye and a broken nose - it wasn't
    from Ms. Lewinski.

    I have a proposal that should be introduced in California
    for any public official for state, county and local
    offices who are elected. In exchange for receiving any
    pay raise the legislator would be drug tested twice a
    year randomly like professional athletes. These
    individuals are representing the general public and their
    actions affect vital public policy issues.

    I have a better idea. Amend the state constitution
    to reflect Amendment 27 of the US Constitution - so that
    no pay raise increase can occur until after the next
    election. That way, politicians can honestly claim
    they are not voting for pay raises for themselves.

    In my county we had a former supervisor who was addicted
    to meth which caused him to miss many days of work. We
    also have a current supervisor who allegedly has drug use
    issues as well which makes it inconsistent with law and
    order issues that deal with his tribe.

    Many people are addicted to prescription drugs. Far more
    so than people who are addicted to illegal drugs. Should
    we ban drugs, or ban people/politicians from taking drugs?
    If we did that, many people would die - needlessly. And
    nobody would want to serve the public in government service.

    In the state of Kansas they actually do drug test the
    state government executives, but perhaps we should
    introduce this as a state law or a ballot proposition.

    Former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan David Duke
    wanted to test all welfare recipients for drugs, as
    well as have all women on welfare neutered so they
    could no longer reproduce like rabbits. I guess it
    was okay with Duke for the guys to keep pimpin', as
    he never mentioned anything about that. At the time
    Duke made those proposals, he was a Louisiana state
    representative and candidate for governor - engaged
    in a runoff with Edwin Edwards.

    Louisiana residents had bumper stickers on their
    cars that read "Vote for the crook, it's important"

    Both Edwards and Duke wound up going to prison.

    This reform will not happen in San Bernardino County,
    since one of the wealthiest members of the board will
    block these reforms. However, we have to take this on the
    state level. I encourage my local elected officials to
    propose this as a reform

    Politics is an honorable profession. As such, we should
    not disparage those who give of themselves to serve the
    public in ways most people would never contemplate doing.

    Most politicians are good, honest, law-abiding citizens
    who honestly try to help those whom they have been elected
    or appointed to serve. Only a handful have misused or
    abused their positions in order to enrich themselves, or
    act in ways unbecoming of what people expect of them.

    We should not make the assumption that all politicians
    are bad or evil people. After all, government is "we the
    people" - meaning government is us.

    --Lee

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)