But I hear the 2nd film has vastly improved flying scenes due
to more clever filming tech, and suspense.
You might like to give it a try and see what story Maverick has
to tell.
What I have seen is complaints in the veteran groups that there are a lot of small details that they've gotten wrong, especially as far as uniforms/decorations are concerned.
JD
What I have seen is complaints in the veteran groups that there are a lot
of small details that they've gotten wrong, especially as far as
uniforms/decorations are concerned. JD
Maybe too much accuracy was purposeful. Built-in plausible deniability. The film's legal council may have recommended that.
Maybe too much accuracy was purposeful. Built-in plausible deniability.No, they just screwed up.
The film's legal council may have recommended that.
JD
Hi John...
Maybe too much accuracy was purposeful. Built-in plausible deniability.
The film's legal council may have recommended that.
No, they just screwed up.
JD
But the story is the most important part not the decorations. One film/performance that strips the environment to the bare essentials (almost literally) is Dogville (Nicole Kidman). Nothing in it physically exact or perfect. But it works.
Hi John...
Maybe too much accuracy was purposeful. Built-in plausible deniability.
The film's legal council may have recommended that.
No, they just screwed up.
JD
But the story is the most important part not the decorations. One film/performance that strips the environment to the bare essentials (almost literally) is Dogville (Nicole Kidman). Nothing in it physically exact or perfect. But it works.
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,041 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 78:46:30 |
Calls: | 236,113 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 60,371 |
D/L today: |
41 files (55,835K bytes) |
Messages: | 289,727 |