• binkD style Nodelist compiler?

    From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to James Barrett on Sat Jan 2 08:18:28 2016

    01 Jan 16 21:38, you wrote to All:

    Back in the day I used Qnode to compile my nodelists. Now, however, I get my binkd style Nodelist from http://www.filegate.net/ipfn/i-binkd/BINKD.TXT

    yup, it's a plain text file... each line is simply a Node line like you would write in your binkd.cfg or a similar include file...

    I googled but can't seem to find a nodelist compiler that will product
    the BINKD.TXT file. I was hoping someone here could point me in the
    right direction.

    the only one i'm aware of is a perl script written by jerry schwartz from his "write by night" bbs... binkd_nodelister.pl... i think there are/were some php versions, too... the one i have is the perl file... version 1.3 from 2007 Apr 14... it is the same script that is used to generate the distributed binkd.txt file... the archive i have of it is bnlpl13.zip and it should be found in the same file distribution area as the except.txt and binkd.txt files... you can get it from my system if you like...

    http://www.wpusa.dynip.com/files2/FDIST/I-BINKD/BNLPL13.ZIP

    i show a date/time of the archive as 2007 Apr 24 03:56 and the actual script inside the archive has the date/time of 2007 Apr 15 00:18... both of those times are 24hour format... i give you those in case you want to have an accurate file date if you add it to your bbs because http transfers get the current date instead of the original date...

    )\/(ark

    "So let me ask you a question about this brave new world of yours. When you've killed all the bad guys, and when it's all perfect, and just and fair, and when
    you have finally got it exactly the way you want it, what are you going to do with the people like you? The trouble makers. How are you going to protect your
    glorious revolution from the next one?" - The twelfth Doctor

    ... We are slow drips without coffee.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From James Downs@1:218/401 to James Barrett on Sat Jan 2 16:40:06 2016
    Re: binkD style Nodelist compiler?
    By: James Barrett to All on Fri Jan 01 2016 21:38:00

    I googled but can't seem to find a nodelist compiler that will product the BINKD.TXT file. I was hoping someone here could point me in the right

    I've been using this: http://ambrosia60.dd-dns.de/53f8ee03/drv_q/div27/i-util/bnlphp12.zip

    It could use some work, but it does create the file properly.
    --- SBBSecho 2.30-Linux
    * Origin: The Lounge (1:218/401)
  • From Matt Bedynek@1:19/10 to James Barrett on Tue Jan 5 08:52:24 2016
    On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 03:38:00 -0500, James Barrett wrote:

    Back in the day I used Qnode to compile my nodelists. Now, however, I get
    my
    binkd style Nodelist from http://www.filegate.net/ipfn/i-binkd/BINKD.TXT

    I googled but can't seem to find a nodelist compiler that will product the BINKD.TXT file. I was hoping someone here could point me in the right direction.

    Did you configure your node to use binkp.net? No real need to use a 'nodelist'.

    Matt

    ---
    * Origin: The Byte Museum - news: news.bytemuseum.org (1:19/10)
  • From Luc Mccarragher@1:249/206 to Matt Bedynek on Tue Jan 5 10:29:23 2016
    Re: binkD style Nodelist compiler?
    By: Matt Bedynek to James Barrett on Tue Jan 05 2016 08:52:24


    Back in the day I used Qnode to compile my nodelists. Now, however,
    I get
    my
    binkd style Nodelist from
    http://www.filegate.net/ipfn/i-binkd/BINKD.TXT
    I googled but can't seem to find a nodelist compiler that will
    product the BINKD.TXT file. I was hoping someone here could point me
    in the right direction.

    Did you configure your node to use binkp.net? No real need to use a 'nodelist'.

    I do not use Nodelist or binkp.net
    i prog all in the binkd.cfg , with Node ... and it work

    ... The cure for admiring the house of lords is to go and look at it.
    --- SBBSecho 2.32-Win32
    * Origin: SpaceSST BBS (1:249/206)
  • From Michael Dukelsky@2:5020/1042 to Matt Bedynek on Tue Jan 5 21:16:12 2016
    Hello Matt,

    Your mail is waiting for you for 122 days. :)

    Michael

    ... node (at) f1042 (dot) ru
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20151128
    * Origin: Moscow, Russia (2:5020/1042)
  • From mark lewis@1:3634/12.73 to Michael Dukelsky on Tue Jan 5 21:29:50 2016

    05 Jan 16 21:16, you wrote to Matt Bedynek:

    Your mail is waiting for you for 122 days. :)

    ouch!! but then i just cut someone loose after they stopped picking up their mail since 2015-09-11 with no word or responses to repeated netmails or emails... sadly, when i deleted all their waiting mail, i also removed them from my nodelist segment :(

    )\/(ark

    ... Divorce is not an effective deterrent to marriage.
    ---
    * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1.1 to Michael Dukelsky on Wed Jan 6 11:26:16 2016

    05 Jan 16 21:16, you wrote to Matt Bedynek:

    Hello Matt,

    Your mail is waiting for you for 122 days. :)

    Why don't you deliver his mail, his binkd has been up all that time. ;)

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: ====================================== (2:221/1.1)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1.1 to Luc Mccarragher on Wed Jan 6 11:27:50 2016
    Hi Luc.

    05 Jan 16 10:29, you wrote to Matt Bedynek:

    Did you configure your node to use binkp.net? No real need to use
    a 'nodelist'.

    I do not use Nodelist or binkp.net
    i prog all in the binkd.cfg , with Node ... and it work

    You never want to send crashmail to anyone not in your binkd.cfg?

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: ====================================== (2:221/1.1)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/6 to Luc Mccarragher on Wed Jan 6 11:39:50 2016

    06 Jan 16 11:27, I wrote to you:

    05 Jan 16 10:29, you wrote to Matt Bedynek:

    Did you configure your node to use binkp.net? No real need to
    use a 'nodelist'.

    I do not use Nodelist or binkp.net
    i prog all in the binkd.cfg , with Node ... and it work

    You never want to send crashmail to anyone not in your binkd.cfg?

    I tried to call you, but you have no AKA's ??

    + 06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] call to 1:249/206@fidonet
    06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] trying f206.n249.z1.binkp.net [70.54.157.198]...
    06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] connected
    + 06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] outgoing session with f206.n249.z1.binkp.net:24554 [70.54.157.198]
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] OPT CRAM-MD5-b4e416193008a11281994f7643a558ee
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] Remote requests MD mode
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] SYS SpaceSST BBS
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] ZYZ Luc McCarragher
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] LOC Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] NDL TCP,BINKP
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] TIME Wed, 6 Jan 2016 04:34:00 -0500
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] VER binkd/1.1a-73/Win32 binkp/1.1
    ? 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] all akas was removed as shared
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] done (to 1:249/206@fidonet, failed, S/R: 0/0
    06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] session closed, quitting...

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: 2001:470:1f15:cb0:f1d0:2:221:6 (2:221/6)
  • From Michael Dukelsky@2:5020/1042 to Tommi Koivula on Wed Jan 6 14:44:56 2016
    Hello Tommi,

    Wednesday January 06 2016, Tommi Koivula wrote to Michael Dukelsky:

    Your mail is waiting for you for 122 days. :)
    Why don't you deliver his mail, his binkd has been up all that time.
    ;)

    Usually I deliver mail to a link myself only if he has asked me to do it. Some guys in the past told me they did not want me to deliver mail, they wanted to fetch it themselves. So now I do deliver mail by myself only for those who explicitly expressed such a wish.

    Michael

    ... node (at) f1042 (dot) ru
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20151128
    * Origin: Moscow, Russia (2:5020/1042)
  • From Matt Bedynek@1:19/10 to Michael Dukelsky on Wed Jan 6 15:07:38 2016
    On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 03:16:12 +0300, Michael Dukelsky wrote:

    Your mail is waiting for you for 122 days. :)

    Been reachable via binkp for all of them. :)

    Thought perhaps the default behavior would be to use that. I will add
    a poll.

    ---
    * Origin: The Byte Museum - news: news.bytemuseum.org (1:19/10)
  • From Matt Bedynek@1:19/10 to Michael Dukelsky on Wed Jan 6 15:18:10 2016
    On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:44:56 +0300, Michael Dukelsky wrote:

    Usually I deliver mail to a link myself only if he has asked me to do
    it. Some guys in the past told me they did not want me to deliver mail, they wanted to fetch it themselves. So now I do deliver mail by myself only for those who explicitly expressed such a wish.

    It is no problem Mike. I have been pretty busy last few months and
    should have more time soon. I didn't even notice! Thanks for
    pointing it out!

    ---
    * Origin: The Byte Museum - news: news.bytemuseum.org (1:19/10)
  • From Luc Mccarragher@1:249/206 to Tommi Koivula on Wed Jan 6 19:48:45 2016
    Re: binkD style Nodelist compiler?
    By: Tommi Koivula to Luc Mccarragher on Wed Jan 06 2016 11:39:50

    Did you configure your node to use binkp.net? No real need to
    use a 'nodelist'.

    I do not use Nodelist or binkp.net
    i prog all in the binkd.cfg , with Node ... and it work

    You never want to send crashmail to anyone not in your binkd.cfg?

    I tried to call you, but you have no AKA's ??

    + 06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] call to 1:249/206@fidonet
    06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] trying f206.n249.z1.binkp.net [70.54.157.198]...
    06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] connected
    + 06 Jan 11:34:04 [2448] outgoing session with f206.n249.z1.binkp.net:24554 [70.54.157.198]
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] OPT CRAM-MD5-b4e416193008a11281994f7643a558ee
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] Remote requests MD mode
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] SYS SpaceSST BBS
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] ZYZ Luc McCarragher
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] LOC Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] NDL TCP,BINKP
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] TIME Wed, 6 Jan 2016 04:34:00 -0500
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] VER binkd/1.1a-73/Win32 binkp/1.1
    ? 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] all akas was removed as shared
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] done (to 1:249/206@fidonet, failed, S/R: 0/0
    06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] session closed, quitting...

    That probaly why using Binkd.txt , it take my lot of time to CFG binkd
    to reprog the CFG to accept unpassword could take time again because i do not known
    Thanks to say it to me , i do not known about it

    ... Nationalise crime, and make sure it doesn't pay.
    --- SBBSecho 2.32-Win32
    * Origin: SpaceSST BBS (1:249/206)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to Luc Mccarragher on Thu Jan 7 11:34:08 2016
    On 7.1.2016 2:48, Luc Mccarragher - Tommi Koivula wrote:

    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] OPT CRAM-MD5-b4e416193008a11281994f7643a558ee
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] Remote requests MD mode
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] SYS SpaceSST BBS
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] ZYZ Luc McCarragher
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] LOC Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] NDL TCP,BINKP
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] TIME Wed, 6 Jan 2016 04:34:00 -0500
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] VER binkd/1.1a-73/Win32 binkp/1.1
    ? 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] all akas was removed as shared
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] done (to 1:249/206@fidonet, failed, S/R: 0/0
    06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] session closed, quitting...

    That probaly why using Binkd.txt

    I believe that is not the reason now. In binkd config you need to have one "address" statement and no "hide-aka"'s to hide it.

    'Tommi

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46
    * Origin: *** nntp://rbb.bbs.fi *** Lake Ylo *** Finland *** (2:221/360)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/6 to Luc Mccarragher on Thu Jan 7 13:55:38 2016
    On 7.1.2016 13:13, Luc Mccarragher - Tommi Koivula wrote:

    That probaly why using Binkd.txt

    I believe that is not the reason now. In binkd config you need to
    have one "address" statement and no "hide-aka"'s to hide it.

    Try it Again !

    1 [5768] BEGIN, binkd/1.1a-75/CYGWIN_NT-6.1 -p -P 1:249/206
    1 [5768] creating a poll for 1:249/206@fidonet (`d' flavour)
    1 [5768] clientmgr started
    1 [6420] call to 1:249/206@fidonet
    1 [6420] trying f206.n249.z1.binkp.net [70.54.157.198]...
    1 [6420] connected
    1 [6420] outgoing session with f206.n249.z1.binkp.net:24554
    1 [6420] OPT CRAM-MD5-8025b16cb8e7303e612816e9a86574ee
    1 [6420] Remote requests MD mode
    1 [6420] SYS SpaceSST BBS
    1 [6420] ZYZ Luc McCarragher
    1 [6420] LOC Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    1 [6420] NDL TCP,BINKP
    1 [6420] TIME Thu, 7 Jan 2016 06:51:47 -0500
    1 [6420] VER binkd/1.1a-73/Win32 binkp/1.1
    1 [6420] addr: 1:249/206@fidonet
    1 [6420] addr: 255:255/0@usenet (n/a or busy)
    1 [6420] addr: 618:500/30@micronet (n/a or busy)
    1 [6420] TRF 0 0
    1 [6420] Remote has 0b of mail and 0b of files for us
    1 [6420] OPT EXTCMD GZ BZ2
    1 [6420] Remote supports EXTCMD mode
    1 [6420] Remote supports GZ mode
    1 [6420] Remote supports BZ2 mode
    1 [6420] done (to 1:249/206@fidonet, OK, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
    1 [6420] session closed, quitting...
    1 [5768] rc(6420)=0
    1 [5768] the queue is empty, quitting...

    Ok! :D

    ---
    * Origin: *** nntp://fidonews.mine.nu *** Finland *** (2:221/6.0)
  • From Luc Mccarragher@1:249/206 to Tommi Koivula on Wed Jan 6 19:52:49 2016
    Re: binkD style Nodelist compiler?
    By: Tommi Koivula to Luc Mccarragher on Wed Jan 06 2016 11:27:50

    I do not use Nodelist or binkp.net
    i prog all in the binkd.cfg , with Node ... and it work

    You never want to send crashmail to anyone not in your binkd.cfg?

    I use all option in bink cfg , but i was thinking if i receive and Send
    to other than my uplink how to Do it !!

    ... Maxwell House Good to the last drop
    --- SBBSecho 2.32-Win32
    * Origin: SpaceSST BBS (1:249/206)
  • From Luc Mccarragher@1:249/206 to Tommi Koivula on Thu Jan 7 06:13:53 2016
    Re: binkD style Nodelist compiler?
    By: Tommi Koivula to Luc Mccarragher on Thu Jan 07 2016 11:34:08


    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] OPT
    CRAM-MD5-b4e416193008a11281994f7643a558ee + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448]
    Remote requests MD mode - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] SYS SpaceSST BBS
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] ZYZ Luc McCarragher
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] LOC Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] NDL TCP,BINKP
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] TIME Wed, 6 Jan 2016 04:34:00 -0500
    - 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] VER binkd/1.1a-73/Win32 binkp/1.1
    ? 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] all akas was removed as shared
    + 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] done (to 1:249/206@fidonet, failed, S/R:
    0/0 06 Jan 11:34:05 [2448] session closed, quitting...

    That probaly why using Binkd.txt

    I believe that is not the reason now. In binkd config you need to have one "address" statement and no "hide-aka"'s to hide it.


    Try it Again !

    ... Timex Takes a licking and keeps on ticking
    --- SBBSecho 2.32-Win32
    * Origin: SpaceSST BBS (1:249/206)