It is like fishing. Cast a line in the water and eventually you get a bite. MB>For these dictionaries are used to crack passwords. The only guessing is in MB>username. Believe it or not these work quite well when the work is distribu MB>among hundreds of compromised zombie hosts. If you can change your pop ser MB>port it is recommended to close that hole entirely.
It is like fishing. Cast a line in the water and eventually you get
a bite. For these dictionaries are used to crack passwords. The only
guessing is in username. Believe it or not these work quite well
when the work is distribu among hundreds of compromised zombie hosts.
If you can change your pop ser port it is recommended to close that
hole entirely.
With VADV32, I've blocked all email IP's, except the incoming ones
from my email server. If they repeatedly try to crash the deal here,
it ends up in the cached IP file (which then refuses the connection entirely), or I'll put it in the blocked IP address...same result.
the thing i never liked about doing that is that it leaves the server to dea ML>with the rejections instead of serving answers to requests... one can be DDo ML>by simply having rafts and rats of blocked IPs hitting all at once for a ML>sustained period... i prefer a dedicated protection system for that purpose. ML>then there's the thing about dynamic IPs being in the block lists... most of ML>those are from compromised machines that get cleaned up and/or get a new IP. ML>when that happens, the old blocked IP is taking up room and shouldn't be in ML>list any more since it is no longer dangerous...
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,027 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 60:34:07 |
Calls: | 504,169 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 161,992 |
D/L today: |
42,258 files (5,710M bytes) |
Messages: | 446,056 |