Just a restatement of what I had asked in IRC:
10:55 < khelair> msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a preferred method of accessing
what the last_msg or last_read pointer might be for the mail
sub, is it?
11:07 < khelair> would I be correct in assuming that the Mail sub, in the
standard shell, utilizes the applicable message header
attributes to glean where the unread ones are at?
though I misphrased it pretty poorly at the beginning. What I meant to say was 'If msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a potential method of accessing the last_msg or last_read pointers, then would I be correct in assuming that the mail sub, in the standard shell, utilizes applicable message header attributes to clean where the unread ones are at?
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,048 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 74:05:17 |
Calls: | 236,065 |
Files: | 60,366 |
D/L today: |
16 files (3,919K bytes) |
Messages: | 289,999 |