Of course, a UNIX command-shell wouldn't be authentic unless someone wr a 'vi' editor to use in place of SyncEdit. Which isn't such a crazy id after all, since 'vi' was designed to run over a serial connection, and since there must be at least a thousand open-source implementations if 'vi' out there. But I guess some ninny would demand a port of 'emacs' too....
pico might not be so bad a choice, either, and might be a little easier
for those who are curious, but have little to no *nix experience. I
know *I* still avoid vi if at all possible.
As to emacs, I only have
this to say. "Get thee behind me, foul demon!" I believe that emacs
lends creedence to the belief that Richard Stallman is, in fact, a stark raving loony.
Listen: 'vi' is, without a doubt, the second worst text-editor in the world.
Lets not forget about ye'ol powerfull edlin....
Lets not forget about ye'ol powerfull edlin....
Sysop: | digital man |
---|---|
Location: | Riverside County, California |
Users: | 1,028 |
Nodes: | 17 (0 / 17) |
Uptime: | 223:24:11 |
Calls: | 503,736 |
Files: | 157,674 |
D/L today: |
1,423 files (63,253K bytes) |
Messages: | 445,068 |